Quote:
Originally Posted by King_of_NYC
So as long as one can profit from someone else's clearly unethical activity (multi-accounting in this case), it stops being a problem??
Not arguing btw. Just curious where people stand on this
The reason multi-accounting is unethical is it unfairly takes money from people. If 100% of the people he plays against are ok with his multi-accounting (and it's ****ing nosebleeds not like it's a big enough player pool for it not to be known instantly) then there's no reason it's unethical. The reason MAing is illegal generally is the victims that it steals ev from. Maybe they give action to someone they wouldn't play otherwise or are playing a game readless when the opponent has reads on them. But when all the potential victims are ok with it there cease to be victims and there's no reason to enforce those rules.
Quote:
Originally Posted by czGLoRy
klink v durrrr hu4rollz
-
would pay to sweat
pretty sure klink could get enough people to buy pieces (I'd buy a piece) if durrrr wanted to play stakes that were too high for him. But Durrrr's not exactly known for finishing matches...