Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
FTP Discussion Thread (Everything but big new news goes here. Cliffs in OP) FTP Discussion Thread (Everything but big new news goes here. Cliffs in OP)
View Poll Results: Do you want the AGCC to regulate the new FTP?
Yes
1,156 56.58%
No
887 43.42%

08-31-2011 , 07:33 PM
Wow what a tardfest this thread is currently..

Can someone tell me what happened to Iffrah? Can't find his answers thread..
08-31-2011 , 07:34 PM
btw, I have a girlfriend and she doesn't care that I have no income anymore, are they with you just for money?
08-31-2011 , 07:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fulzgold
Wow what a tardfest this thread is currently..

Can someone tell me what happened to Iffrah? Can't find his answers thread..
Trying to find out, too. Dude is a joke but I still want to know what happened to him and his thread.
08-31-2011 , 07:38 PM
The Ifrah thread is gone? WTF?
08-31-2011 , 07:41 PM
@mods: should we really discuss "Ivey whereabouts" ITT where it would just create chaos or is it a banned subject for some reason? Imo it deserves attention. It does not make poker look good if the GOAT and fan favorite poker player seemingly disappears while a whole lot of money belonging to the fans has gone missing and nobody gives a damn. It makes the poker world look even more shady as when you look at the whole FTP situation alone.

NoahSD implied if I understood him correctly that FTP shareholders not agreeing to terms they should be ****ing happy with is one of the things standing in the way of an investor deal. Makes me feel like they are a little bit too comfortable with the whole situation than they should be.
08-31-2011 , 07:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Todd Terry
The Ifrah thread is gone? WTF?
My bad. I unstickied it because it seems that Ifrah's not going to be posting on 2p2 anymore (though he's still responding to e-mails and phone calls) and people didn't seem to be reading it much. I didn't realize that unstickying a locked thread makes it fall off the universe, so my bad there.

It still exists and is linked to in the OP. Plus, all of his questions and answers are already in this thread. I figure that's sufficient?
08-31-2011 , 07:43 PM
i think we all need to take a step back from the situation. Emotional decisions are always rash. We need to be doing whatever we can to help get our money back.

By posting all this negative ****, investors might be reading its just hurting our chances.
i understand it might be valid but i think we need to redirect our efforts
08-31-2011 , 07:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nitur1984
To guys who are devastated about all this:

You obv are talented people, you can do it again and rebuild a big bankroll easily. You have done it once and will do another time.

Does that situation really suck and is BS? Sure! But who cares, it's the past now! stop worrying about the past, it's so useless. You feel bad? Go outside, smoke a spliff, have sex or drink alcohol (the cheapest one now that we're broke - lol)

You're totally broke? Fine, send your graphs to some guys on 2+2 who will happily stake you, and you'll just rebuild quietly.

Of course that sucks to play stakes ten times lower than what you are used to but see it as a test. the strongest will survive it and make in their life 6-7 figures playing stupid cards, and the weakest will "give up" stupidly.

Your lives are not ruined! I don't even understand how you can say that, I mean you don't just got infected by AIDS, money is just BS, don't worry about it, it comes and goes.
be cool with yourself.
Life is good even if people like Lederer and Bitar exist, that only proves life is not perfect

BTW, for those who REALLY have problem to pay bills, or keep their house etc, you guys did not cashout? I think at least 50% of lifetime profit should be cashouted, that seems normal, no? What would have happened if you were hacked or simply stopped winning? I think there was something wrong in "your plan" : the "rule" who says you must have at least one year of life expense at the bank to gamble profesionnally just proved being right I guess.

(that comes from someone losing 5 figures and about 25% of my "overall" money, so don't say I can't understand)
Your right but seriously these guys stole money, and everyone should just ***** forget about it like it never happened? I can do that WHEN I see ferguson/lederer and bitar complete broke no money no nothing then I can move on but as long as they have money that is ours the players I do care.
08-31-2011 , 07:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbfg
NoahSD implied if I understood him correctly that FTP shareholders not agreeing to terms they should be ****ing happy with is one of the things standing in the way of an investor deal. Makes me feel like they are a little bit too comfortable with the whole situation than they should be.
I don't remember implying that...
08-31-2011 , 07:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoahSD
I don't remember implying that...
You can edit it out if you want in that case, I asked for what you meant with the post but you didn't reply. I'll look for the post I meant and quote it itt.
08-31-2011 , 07:47 PM
If discussion of Ivey's whereabout seems relevant and doesn't derail the thread, go ahead. I agree that a reasonable amount of speculation on him specifically is pertinent.

I locked the other thread because it was essentially should have been in the containment thread but was too big to merge and the answer given was "no one knows" and a lot of random gibberish.

I would imagine if Mr. Ifrah's thread has disappeared it's because another mod (most likely Noah) took it down due to either a direct request or some other factor.

Ninja edit: Yep, it got unstickied. I think as long as it's linked in this thread for people who want to find it that should be good, IMO.
08-31-2011 , 07:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoahSD
My bad. I unstickied it because it seems that Ifrah's not going to be posting on 2p2 anymore (though he's still responding to e-mails and phone calls) and people didn't seem to be reading it much.
Did he say that? If it was posted I may have missed it...
08-31-2011 , 07:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoahSD
I don't remember implying that...
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoahSD
Quote:
Originally Posted by iMsoLucky0
I don't understand what types of 'negotiations' are going on. It seems like the deal they offer ANY investor should just be:

"We have $x left, we need $y to pay everyone off, would you like to buy 100% of our company for $y and pay everyone back? k thx"

But the fact that they are 'negotiating' leads me to believe those slimy ****ers are either trying to A) profit immediately off the deal or B) keep some sort of interest/control in the company other than as a strict employee.

Am I wrong?

Negotiations isn't the best word to describe what's happening, but it's the word that everybody uses and I can't think of a better one. I think, though I obviously I can't be sure, that your quote is roughly what's going on now.
this is the post.
08-31-2011 , 07:52 PM
It's not posted, but I don't think he's going to be posting on 2p2 anymore. He's still responding to everyone's e-mails, and he's one of the few people in the history of 2p2 to actually check off the box that let's users send you e-mails through 2p2's software, so you can actually click on his SN and send him an e-mail that way.
08-31-2011 , 07:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbfg
this is the post.
I was saying the exact opposite of what you said I was implying. As far as I know, (and I really don't know) FTP's owners are offering to give away the company in exchange for enough money to anyone who can settle with the DOJ and repay players.
08-31-2011 , 07:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Todd Terry
The Ifrah thread is gone? WTF?
I can't really imagine Jeff continuing to reply publicly here after that "big news" press release today.

He'd get abused too badly.
08-31-2011 , 08:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoahSD
I was saying the exact opposite of what you said I was implying. As far as I know, (and I really don't know) FTP's owners are offering to give away the company in exchange for enough money to anyone who can settle with the DOJ and repay players.
I see now. When I first read it it felt like you thought his post was accurate but you're only refering to the words between the quotes.
08-31-2011 , 08:03 PM
Those of you who will be e-mailing jeff, you can write anything new here.
08-31-2011 , 08:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoahSD
I was saying the exact opposite of what you said I was implying. As far as I know, (and I really don't know) FTP's owners are offering to give away the company in exchange for enough money to anyone who can settle with the DOJ and repay players.
Most optimistic price for that would be somewhere in the $600-$700M range, you think? Based on our guesstimates for all player deposits and theoretical fine with the DOJ using the Moneybookers case as a baseline?
08-31-2011 , 08:11 PM
We may not all like it, but Jeff I needs to get back to looking out for the intrests of those that hired him! It would be in his clients intrest if FTP would pay off somehow, but I doubt he can make that happen. He needs to deal with what's coming ( if there is no payout) from the CA suits. That's what the "usual suspects" hired him for , not to save FTP or help the players get their money recovered.
08-31-2011 , 08:11 PM
Well, the AGCC wants $300M in a bank account before they turn the lights back on. (I forget if that's public or not. Too many numbers....) DOJ settlements usually tend not to be paid so soon, so it's reasonable to think that maybe the DOJ would not require a settlement upfront and that perhaps a DOJ settlement could come from the profits of a well-run FTP. There's also always the naive hope that some of the owners at FTP recognize their responsibility to players and have enough integrity to actually put up some of their own money.

So, I would say that a sort of super crazy optimistic though not entirely unreasonable estimate is $200M. A reasonable though maybe slightly optimistic estimate is $300M. And, a pessimistic estimate is probably like $500M.
08-31-2011 , 08:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoahSD
Well, the AGCC wants $300M in a bank account before they turn the lights back on. (I forget if that's public or not. Too many numbers....)
It is now!
08-31-2011 , 08:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoahSD
Well, the AGCC wants $300M in a bank account before they turn the lights back on. (I forget if that's public or not. Too many numbers....) DOJ settlements usually tend not to be paid so soon, so it's reasonable to think that maybe the DOJ would not require a settlement upfront and that perhaps a DOJ settlement could come from the profits of a well-run FTP. There's also always the naive hope that some of the owners at FTP recognize their responsibility to players and have enough integrity to actually put up some of their own money.

So, I would say that a sort of super crazy optimistic though not entirely unreasonable estimate is $200M. A reasonable though maybe slightly optimistic estimate is $300M. And, a pessimistic estimate is probably like $500M.
True, I didn't take into account that the DOJ would be unlikely to ask for their amount up front.

I think the $400-500M is probably a reasonable assumption at this time based on player liabilities.
08-31-2011 , 08:14 PM
There obviously is a differce though between what you need to buy FTP and what you need to run FTP, but for the investor it's the same number.
08-31-2011 , 08:16 PM
If FTP goes bankrupt, what % that the DOJ goes after lederer/ferguson/ivey or others?

      
m