I'm voting for McCain. If you don't like it Mr. Obama avatar you can kiss my big ass. I'm voting for the real bitch. Not no cheap imitation.

Wrong quote mickey. His avatar flames me too.

In an attempt to get this thread back on track, here's my take on the three working out of the same bankroll:

It's not that they had to collude. The fact that all three of them were good poker players and that they played cards with each other every night and spent the rest of the days and nights talking about it, they didn't have to collude. They knew what the other was doing just like you know what you spouse is doing or thinking, or what your coworker is doing of thinking. After awhile you just know.They had to be a real force at the poker table.

What ever happened to sailor Roberts?

I see Slim is running shady over raked poker tourneys in the Texas panhandle. Is that all he's doing?

And we all know what Doyle is doing.

That whole argument was about glory hunters, being Amercian or not wasn't even part of the equation; although the Americans got extremely defensive, when in the context of the thread they were least culpable, or to be more precise in fact, not even the subject of discussion.

I believe your 'hilarious' retort (singular) was that I'd supported Miami Dolphins for 25+ years - LOL, good one.

Oski is the single most dishonest poster on this forum. He lies. He knows he is lying. He makes ignorant arguments. He says Lott has found instances of plagiarism in my stories. However, neither one of them can ever cite an example. I started a great thread where I asked folks if their family gambled, and how they got started. It got about 100 responses, few haters, and folks shared their memories. However, no one else was called a liar for their memories. To the best of my ability, I am telling the truth in my stories. If I am not, I ask Jesus Christ, my savior, to strike me dead this very morning.

Johnny Hughes

Jesus' road name is Jerusalem Slim.

Johnny ......you still with us ?

I lol'd hard. Especially at the edit.

I thought you said I was the single most dishonest person here? Now my feelings are hurt. Oski, you are top dog now. Dadgummit, I hate being second. Anyway, We got this storm coming in here (Hurricane Ike), and I live right on Galveston Bay. Won't be able to post for a few days probably, as we will probably lose power later tonight. Will post some damage, flood, and wind pics of the area in the (Other-Topic) area when I can. Any of you other guys/gals in this area take care, stay safe, and keep high and dry.

JH, I sure hope for your sake Jesus don't call your bluff. You take care too, and get out there to the truckstop and have you a bowl of oatmeal with DubbleBubble. I know you like your oatmeal. You'll feel better having wayyyy the best of it. Be thankful you are far from the coast.

IRONY + HYPOCRACY SQUARED

This is a place where people **** their pants about Poker Bots... and how that's OMG "cheating". But they can't get enough Johnny Hughes Apologetics... about psychopathic killers, Mafia soldiers, and garden variety grifters and con men... just because they are somehow connected to poker.

And Johnny Hughes... Jesus is not "your Lord and Savior". You do not know Jesus... and Jesus does not know you. Instead... you devote your life to GLORIFYING all manner of Evil... and BRAG about knowing every last stinking criminal that ever posted a blind.

Like the guy said...
Christ WILL call your bluff someday...
Because you are drawing dead.

Interesting. I don't see how you can call someone a liar for asking questions. I don't see how asking questions = arguments. I don't see how stating a belief = lying.

You claim to have been a college professor for nearly 20 years. I am quite certain you were not. In any event, someone with a PHD should be able to read and understand basic English, and undertand the difference between asking questions and making statements of fact.

By the way, Lott has found inconsistencies in your stories that lead me to believe him. You consistently overlook that as if it never happened. As for plagerism, if you weren't all those places you said you were playing poker with all those people you said you were, the basis of your character is a lie. That is what Lott's argument is; I you attack Lott for being wrong; I happen to believe Lott is correct in that respect.

As I said before, Johnny, if the question is inappropriate, just tell me why and I will drop it. How is a question a "lie." If you want to keep calling me the biggest liar, etc. on this board, go ahead. Its not true and it even might make me start trying to answer some questions myself. I never wanted to before, I don't want to now. I asked some questions, you haven't answered them.

No biggie.

Dude, quit while you are behind; way behind. Its obvious you still feel the burn of looking like a total fool and for being exposed as a liar. Therefore, I understand why you are going out of your way to involve yourself with me in this thread. I understand you feel stupid for being exposed as a liar; that you want to rewrite history to make yourself feel better; and that you want to somehow rehash your precious argument so that you can somehow "win." I'm sorry the burn is still with you; next time, try not to lie so much, especially when those lies are material to the point you attempt to support.

Even in the very thread you want to somehow revisit, a mod (on his own volitiion) posted words to the effect that you got buried and made yourself look bad. IF that wasn't enough, a group of other posters observed and verified the carnage.

You were called to task for many, many, many lies that you made without realizing you had posted many contrary views on your other board under the same name. By the way, you continually insulted Americans by name. You directly spoke to them as a group and insisted on insulting them. This was all pointed out to you, and you refused to withdraw your statements or apologize.

I am not going to speak to this further. I never understood why you would go to such great lenghts and expose your lack of intellectual integrity just to "win" an argument about soccer ... Especially when the other guy was mostly concerned with your flippant attitute towards insulting groups of people. Americans are people too, lol.

Your google must be different than mine. Certainly not on the first page.

Anyway, I didn't "ask" that J.H. prove anything to me, at first. All I did was state that I agree with Lott. J.H. told me to look him up on some magazine website. The website information posed some interesting questions, which, when I attempted to verify them, didn't pan out.

Up to that point, I was only there and looking per J.H.'s invitation. I came back here and posted that some stuff didn't add up in regards to his claim of being the Director of a specific Department at Texas Tech.

After many hours, J.H. addressed those questions and gave a very evasive answer. I didn't find the offered information helpful and not only was I not swayed towards believing him, I was swayed further towards wondering if the part about him being a college professor was "appropriated" as well.

In any event, J.H. stated in no uncertain terms, that he is content to send me on a wild goose chase because this is fun for him. Well, okay. I asked some questions; he gives answers that don't add up; and he explains that he want to give me the run around just for asking the questions in the first place.

I got it then, I get it now. I have stated that if I want to "investigate him" I would; that is not really my aim, but J.H. seems to insist on goading me into it. I just might follow up on some stuff that I have.

I don't know why I have to keep repeating this.
1. I don't really care one way or another about J.H.'s identity for the sake of the question itself. We clear on that?
2. I only invovled myself because I spoke my opinion about the theory of another poster, Lott. Lott was being ridiculed for his "absurd" ideas, but I wanted people to know that I don't think his theories are absurd, nor does he deserve the ridicule that he was subject to.
3. At that point ... J.H. jumps in and chastises me for stating my opinion and starts said wild goose chase. Since that point, I have merely been reminding people that I am only asking questions, not stating matters of fact, etc. J.H. however, claims that makes me the biggest liar on these boards.
4. No big deal. My opinion has not changed regarding the "debate" between J.H. and Lott. I think Lott is correct and should not be ridiculed by J.H., unless J.H. wants to actually address Lott's points.

By the way, J.H. is content to "deflect" the issues as if they don't exist. Lott has made many posts in the past pointing out many facts adverse to J.H.'s claims of who he is; Lott has pointed out inconsistencies in J.H.'s stories. I am not going to rehash those; I don't know if Lott will. J.H. is content to pretend those issues never came up. For me, that's fine. Because my whole statement is merely that I believe that Lott is correct. J.H. is not interested changing my opinion in that regard, and that is just fine.

It seems to be about flaming each other now. You guys can flame over PM because nobody else cares.