Quote:
Originally Posted by reztes757
by "they" you mean the site? So the site was reaping the benefits of the scandal instead of a handful of employees? News to me
Funny you arguing with EG. Weren't you one of the players requesting their HH's from UB? Anyway, yes the site was reaping benefits by the anount of rake collected from the cheating accounts, the affected players. etc. Not to mention much of the time, the cheaters were actually owners of the site and benefited by overlay reduction, etc. I hate to sidetrack this discussion. These were not low-level employees who did the cheating.
I any event, I would venture to guess that UB/AP has problems moving forward with the DOJ b/c they offer Blackjack and other Casino Games. Since this company has never been transparent it would be just a guess by me that they claim they cannot play players b/c their funds were part of what the DOJ seized. Even if not, If I was a player with money tied up on Cereus, I would not trust the company to do the right thing and pay they players their balances, when it seem they can just walk on it. Just a guess with no knowledge, but given the past history, who knows.
Also, why wasn't Joe Norton named? He "bought" UB/AP when UIGEA hit. Yet it is former founders/owners/Montana Frat boys named? What about when Leggett and CO. say none of the former management were involved, but yet they are named in the indictment, post sale? So it seems TOM/Beckley were always involved all along.