A+ tweeting, bot is an absolute savage

does not splitting equity reduce the variance at the end of saying who has skill edge?

in other words i think in a mirror hand situation if you only could chose that you have the data of net won or EV won. in a mirror situation Net won will give you better data to jugde with player/bot has a skill edge.

If the bot match before this one was played with running out instead of chop it would be less likely a statistical tie (if we assume humans had a skill edge there)

We need Dnegs and phil hellmuth to take on the bot

talk about rubbing salt in the wounds...

-

Imagine if they go there and beat it hahaha
it would be really fun to see that bot losing to worse players LOL

the HU team would be so sad.

add moneymaker to the team and GG
lol

Tuning in for the first time watching this Jason guy play. He's talking to people about some weird ****. Why the **** is he having conversations with people when he's 2 tabling the bot? I tell my kids to get the hell upstairs when I'm 1 tabling someone. Clearly not focusing as much as a great player should. Lol.. now he's on his phone texting someone. What a joke.

He also talks a bit like Jungleman. Guys tilting hard about how they won last time and yadda yadda yadda.. weirdo. Think he needs to take a bit less addy.

Human opponents don't tank every single hand. Give him a break.

Not having a hud is kind of dumb. Surely the computer has to be adjusting to the opponent in some manner right? Or is it just playing it's own cards?

Like, if you open shove 10 times in a row, is it more likely to call with a weaker hand.

"Give me two weeks to study and i'll crush this bot just like those bad NL5k regs"

- Daniel Negreanu

wow... and aw what happened to the hands?

There needs to be time constraints or something. Humans biggest disadvantage are emotions. Playing against a tanking computer for hours on end has to be soo tilting. Humans should get to tilt the computer by saying it has 15 seconds to make a decision.

A late response but:

What I find interesting here is that I have been coached by member's of Doug's crew since late 2011 and I am familiar with the strategy. When I started looking at Piosolver, I was amazed at how similar our strategy and Pio's strategy(ies) are. Evil Empire jumped far ahead of the pack in arriving at optimal play long before solvers by simply doing a lot of hard work in the lab.

The obvious differences I see (without getting into too much detail) are in polarization methods and simply using combos for randomization rather than pio's pure frequency methods which are not possible to use if you are a mere human.

I think Doug's opinion of the solvers has some merit, but he is mostly incorrect. Human using solver to combat human will win, as is becoming evident by nightly human input to Libratus which has had tremendous results so far.

Haven't kept track of today but it seems like another smash by Libratus, right? This thing is over. No way that the humans will keep playing even their C game at this point.

What are the chance Humans can hold loss under 1SDEV significance to make it a "statistical tie"?

What is the current total? It was being posted after everyday until recently...

Humans have already lost and likely not even playing their A game anymore and everyone stopped caring.

... Really bro?

I think today has been pretty bad for the humans so far though.. Probably updated score on twitch in an hour or so when they are done for the day just check whenever for totals https://www.twitch.tv/libratus_extra

Why rip timex

His site was offering +400 on the AI or something like that before the match started.

True but wasn't it really small betting limits

Proof that humans tank turns too

Zooming in on the good stuff

raise 250 call
check bet 250 raise 880 call
bet 1423 call
bet 3216 call



raise 250 call
check bet 2000 (4xPOT) call
check bet 3534 call
check jam 14k call