Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
Yeah, that part was pretty absurd. There should be no issue with anything that is a pure teaching tool, unless there was cheating of some kind involved to develop or use it, like shared hand histories.
Let's take a somewhat absurd hypothetical and see if you still agree with this statement. IBM's Watson solves PLO but does so privately. It leaks to one poker player who gains access to this software and uses it to train off the tables 10 hours a day. Watson plays completely perfectly, and even has the ability to leak find and explain different spots. Basically, the program is the perfect player and the perfect coach such that anyone with access to it would have a dramatic advantage to others trying to learn the game from more traditional and available to all methods.
They don't use Watson when actually playing so they aren't cheating. I'd still argue this is a messed up situation and that the player who is leaked the private software may be entitled to the money but not praise.
But I can accept you don't agree. Depending on what the software does, the extent to which it basically trains people to play like GTO bots is the relevant question. Is Ben naturally special as a top poker mind or has he just gotten access to software others don't have? I have no idea. I'd love to hear him or Ike explain what private software they have used and how much it has helped them.
Don't you find Ike's immediate rise to the top strange? PLO wasn't new when he made the switch and he literally was at the top almost immediately from starting. As you can see from WGC and many others that the make the switch there is normally a learning curve. It's interesting he had none.