hey peeps need some help, just wondering if there is any mods for the software epn uses, that being 5 dimes openwaters and tiger gaming (admitdly tiger is diff network but same software) I cant use mouse to scroll bet sizes or button pressets like 2.5x or 3x bet sizes buttons which is a pretty big deal when multitabling when you have to manualy pull the slider up which is inacurate at best, any tips for dealing with this i'm missing or is there any 3rd party software i can use to combat this?

also any table skins available anyware?

I made custom config in stack and tile so I have at least fold/call/raise working via hotkeys so I don't have to do it manually all the time. Mouse wheel etc. or any working betpot is no go for now.

hey, I was banned from poker host for playing aggressively, can I join FFP and and get ban?

thanks

When PokerHost joined the Equity Network everyone thought that the addition of PH was just the shot in the arm that the network needed to really take off. Instead PokerHost resorted to these ridiculous bannings and the network's CEO publically gave his suport to the bannings. The CEO also made it clear that the network was utilizing the infamous Recreational Player Model, something that I think most players weren't aware of.

The Equity Network had been steadily growing until PokerHost joined. The growth abruptly stopped and if anything has declined a bit. Equity has really shot itself in the foot. I think that it needs to do some serious reevaluating.

I think that it's most likely that you are banned on all of the skins but it couldn't hurt to call support to ask if you can create an account.

Norton quarantined a Trojan that was within the PokerHost Equity network software as of June 10th:

not saying your wrong but what are your sources for this?

Source for what exactly? I said a few things there.

would love to know how to do that man, i don't know how complicated it is though, I find for tiger gaming at least they allow you to change the table theme to retro which lets you actually type in the exact amount you want to bet, unlike there newest version theme which on openwaters (5dimes) is the only theme you can use. albeit a slower process but lets the bet sizing be more perfect at least, hope somebody finds a way around this shockingly bad software, suprised they think its EVEN OKAY, vs the competition. peopel who designed it didnt have a clue can be the only excuse i can think of all other excuses just make them look bad

You come off as confrontational.

I was wondering as to where you read that PH actually banned those players for aggressive play and not the network.

It has nothing to do with me being confrontational. And whether or not it was Equity or PokerHost that was doing the bannings, has absolutely nothing to do with the point I was making.

I was criticizing Equity for supporting the bannings. If they were directly responsible for them then my comments are even more to the point. The Calvin Ayre article that was linked earlier in this thread clearly stated that generally the skins are pressured into these types of decisions through a "shark tax". In all probability that's what caused PokerHost to ban the players. The emails weren't sent out by the network; they were sent out by PokerHost. When I asked Sandy Taylor about the situation she responded to me that her skin hadn't banned any players at all; so it really doesn't seem that the network is micromanaging these bannings. To do so would certainly be against the network's overall business paradigm.

Through the bannings and through accounts like mine being closed due to the fact that I already belonged to a skin on the Equity Network, PokerHost has surely lost a good number of its active members. They haven't brought the number of players that we all had hoped that they would to the network. And all the bad press about player bannings has surely hurt the network. I, like a lot of others, kept my eyes on PokerScout hoping for a bump in the player pool when this transition happened. Instead what I saw was an almost immediate drop in players and a cessation in the very steady network growth rate that had taken place from the first day of the network's opening and that had abruptly ended the week that PokerHost joined the network.

well you certainly sound impartial

bannings are due to pokerhost not wanting to pay the shark tax on their winning players at the higher games

is the integer player pool still playing on the integer software or did they have to migrate to full flush?

You don't sound particularly credible when you state this as fact...

And then ask something silly like this...


--
Kahn

Do you have a source for this?

its hilarious when you question my statements and don't offer an alternate theory. but keep acting like the expert in this thread, its adorable.

Well i'm not attacking anyone I was just wondering if you in fact had anything to back up what you are saying or your just spewing hersay. Looks like the latter, can we stop with the slap fight here and actually talk about what is going on with I dunno the network.

I don't know why you are so skeptical about PokerHost banning players because of a shark tax. The entire basis of the Equity network is that they have a hands off approach to the various skins. They have clearly stated that they use a shark tax to encourage skins to regulate the type of players on the network. That is simply their way of doing business.

When PokerHost was banning players while it was still on the Merge Network, you posted that you thought that PokerHost was probably doing so because of a shark tax on that network even though it wasn't known that a shark tax even existed on that network. Now you're playing devil's advocate for a network where we know that a shark tax does, in fact, exist. What MarcoEsq is saying is hardly spewing hearsay. It's a very reasonable, albeit not verified, conclusion to draw from the facts that the network itself has released in the Calvin Ayre article and other articles describing the Equity Networks overall business philosophy.

I'm mystified as to why you think that is a silly question. When one skin buys another they can take one of two routes. They can allow the skin to keep operating as a separate entity as Aced Poker was allowed to do when Carbon Poker bought it; or they can integrate the purchased skin into their own as I assume Integer was integrated into FullFlush. The question was simply that of asking which approach FullFlush took.

A couple of people PM'd me recommending that I give this network a shot. How are cashout times?

As with any network.. Use an affiliate

I tried to find an affiliate for BetOnline already in the p2p thread but got infraction points because apparently you can't post there unless you already have an account and funds to trade.

Where do you think I could find an affiliate for this network (Equity)? I already have one for WPN and Revolution.

About a week for checks, 2-4 days for cash transfers (WU/MG). Pretty solid.

After reading the post above, I was wondering if someone could link me to the official EPN deposit/withdrawal thread. Can't seem to find it for some reason, thanks.

Yup! super solid

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/28...+poker+network


--
Kahn

One cashout per week allowed via skrill/neteller and max only 2.5k $

Requested max cashout 18-th and then another one 24-th and the denied it after 3 days because I requested it 6 days after the previous request.