Quote:
Originally Posted by LETIGRA
https://calvinayre.com/2017/04/20/po...-global-first/
this article has kinda a 'Calvin' feel to it and since there is no author I feel he likely wrote it. The good news is it is the first article with links of numbers to call and emails to write to.
Calvin (I suspect), also makes some unfair analogies and his references towards what constitutes cheating are suspect.
enjoy.
"‘pro’ players buy hand-data, via their screenname, and use that data against recreational players. This isn’t being a ’pro’ player, its cheating."
Whoever wrote the press release (
not article) didn't state this well. As written, it implies that all pro players buy hand histories, which probably isn't true.
Although the press release is weak on substance, and is obviously just an attempt to paint Bodog and its associated properties in a good light (as press releases often do) there is a logical flaw in posts above. Walk with me.
Let's take it to the extreme: all cheaters are net withdrawers (he said "tend to only withdraw," but this a cleaner example). "He said all net withdrawers are cheaters!" Um, no. All poodles are dogs does not imply that all dogs are poodles.
And there is nothing in there that can be read as saying net depositers are cheaters, despite what some clueless guy commenting below said, unless there was a previous version that they have since edited.