Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
[Unibet] Official Thread [Unibet] Official Thread

06-21-2017 , 04:44 PM
Can you confirm rakeback is done through bonus points and what you call is playthrough bonus is actually rakeback? If I use 500 bonus points to buy 5 euros are there any conditions before I can withdraw this money/rakeback?
[Unibet] Official Thread Quote
06-21-2017 , 05:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrno1324
Can you confirm rakeback is done through bonus points and what you call is playthrough bonus is actually rakeback? If I use 500 bonus points to buy 5 euros are there any conditions before I can withdraw this money/rakeback?
It's a bonus rather than straight cash.

In a sense it plays as an additional 20% rakeback while you are clearing it. The bonus is divided into 5 equal chunks.

So if you buy a 5 euro bonus then for every 5 euros you rake you get 1 euro credited to your account and that happens 5 times.

I don't worry about it like that. I just buy the bonus then forget about it. The cash comes pretty quickly anyway.
[Unibet] Official Thread Quote
06-21-2017 , 05:53 PM
andrew,
could you please extend my double trouble ticket
username
benodclxvi
Ty again
[Unibet] Official Thread Quote
06-21-2017 , 05:55 PM
Btw there's a bug..
My cash balance shows "???"
[Unibet] Official Thread Quote
06-21-2017 , 06:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by amater0001
Btw there's a bug..
My cash balance shows "???"
It's not a bug, you just deactivated "Show Balance"; to fix this you just need to push again on the button in front of "Show Balance"...

GL at the tables
[Unibet] Official Thread Quote
06-21-2017 , 09:29 PM
David, To give you a response.

Rake:
The reason I'm in favour of scaled rake for UO's is it makes sense for the same reason that SNG rake on Unibet decreases at the top end buyins. In UO's fields are tougher at the 250 price point... and most importantly there isn't a 1st prize payout (which would help a skilled player) but rather 5 same prizes (2k euro each)... therefore feasible ROI's decrease in such a format and therefore so should rake compared to a regular MTT of the same buy in with the same entries. A top end SNG player can't come close to the ROI of a top notch MTT player and that's why rake is lower in them.
Furthermore this is a satellite to a Unibet Open. There is considerable value in having players attend these events.

Protecting Players:

I get it from the sites pov. (revenue)
I get that it keeps low skilled players in the game longer (lower churn)

But this is the mentality of a Pub that wants to keep it's customers sober... many pub visitors do on their own accord but the fact is many want to get wasted and if you won't serve them someone else will and that's not good for current players or Unibet.

Predators to the site:

In theory this could be a concern but in reality it's not. Having a 100 buy in with a 5k guarantee isn't going to lure in a Stars,888, Party pro player. They have all the action they want on their own sites. Once you guys get in the 20k guarantee range it could become worth some players time to open up Unibet but my instinct tells me Unibet isn't there yet. Players don't love multi siting and Unibet's client isn't the most friendly for a Multitabling HUD user who needs his timebank done automatically.

tbh it's the enemy within that Unibet should be focused on. By poorly structured/long late reg satellites you guys are allowing 'snipers' to pop in on the bubble in some cases and literally steal the seat away from an innocent player. I saw this type of shenanigans on Full Tilt and even worse satellite shenanigans and hope that Unibet fixes all loopholes in this regard. If less seats need to be guaranteed or even an overlay given out it is far less damaging then having a player think, he's all in and will at least get the leftover money should he lose the hand only to have some guy join at the last second and steal it from him.
I know the above example doesn't happen too often but just the advantage due to late regging with so many players already KO'd shouldn't be allowed. Some more balance should be considered.
[Unibet] Official Thread Quote
06-22-2017 , 05:18 AM
If you remove the rake race, you will still lose players in my opinion ...

I do not understand why you do not put zoom poker ... It would be a solution for players who do not know how to run your app and who are forced to go through a browser ... I have 2 friends who still do not know Not play on your new software and they do not want to play via browser ... If there was zoom poker, they would still play at home even with the browser!

I think you do not have enough players to propose other variants ... And especially not formats banzai kind, you will still deplete the number of players at other tables ...

You have to realize that regular players are at home for your innovation and your games weaker despite the fact that you do not have a rakeback system ... If now the level naturally becomes higher, you remove rake Race and other ...

Your software is very fluid but it is still quite heavy unfortunately.

Congratulations on your promotions and good luck for the rest
[Unibet] Official Thread Quote
06-22-2017 , 04:37 PM
How come I can addon with a ticket, that I dont have, in rebuys?
[Unibet] Official Thread Quote
06-22-2017 , 04:38 PM
Is there any way I can see how many hands I played per session?
[Unibet] Official Thread Quote
06-22-2017 , 05:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnCleese
How come I can addon with a ticket, that I dont have, in rebuys?
This is a bug. You will be charged cash.

@David IMHO you should suspend rebuys until this is fixed.
[Unibet] Official Thread Quote
06-22-2017 , 06:24 PM
Don't know if this has been reported before or if anyone else is having this problem, but lately changing identify is lagging really hard. Rest of the client works fine, but trying to change my identity just takes forever.
[Unibet] Official Thread Quote
06-22-2017 , 07:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnibetDavid
We're adding PLO Banzai in July
[ ] Unbeatable games are good for the poker economy.
[Unibet] Official Thread Quote
06-22-2017 , 07:53 PM
Also fast fold cash games please one time
[Unibet] Official Thread Quote
06-22-2017 , 09:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnibetDavid
We're adding PLO Banzai in July
No Limit Omaha would work better than Pot Limit for this format. Assuming you still want the fast, mostly all-in preflop, action of the NLH games.
[Unibet] Official Thread Quote
06-23-2017 , 01:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daleroxxu
No Limit Omaha would work better than Pot Limit for this format. Assuming you still want the fast, mostly all-in preflop, action of the NLH games.
+1 I hope this is a typo.
[Unibet] Official Thread Quote
06-23-2017 , 07:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daleroxxu
No Limit Omaha would work better than Pot Limit for this format. Assuming you still want the fast, mostly all-in preflop, action of the NLH games.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LektorAJ
+1 I hope this is a typo.
https://www.unibetcommunity.com/t5/C...ker/ba-p/95982

Confirmed NLO, not PLO.
[Unibet] Official Thread Quote
06-23-2017 , 06:51 PM
can you please add something so i don't get seated at tables with 2-3 players?!
some times of the day is really ridiculous becouse not 1/8 tables is running with 6 people.

I just spend 30 minutes trying to get tables going with 5-6 people then i ragequit my session becouse cursed for about 15 minutes at the people that continue to play headsup where i get reseated + i had 0 reads and no clue at all who i am playing against since i been busy trying to ditch the tables that run 2-4 handed.

If this continues to be a problem for me i will be forced to open 8 tables and close half of the tables i don't want to play, then fill the rest of my screen up with tables from another pokerclient.
Or only play on unibet between 19:00 and 23:00 cest. where this isnt a problem becouse traffic is higher.

for example:
-you can just let people enable a box in options so they only join tables with 4+ active players. (These tables seem to run propperly for a long time while 2-4 handed stays 2-4 handed most of the time. so imo other people also are fed up with this.)
- you can stop people from joining tables where people play 2-3 handed so no tables get in that vicious cirlce of running 2-4 handed for an hour and then getting closed eventually.
[Unibet] Official Thread Quote
06-23-2017 , 11:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnibetDavid


Are you still having this issue?

Yupp.
[Unibet] Official Thread Quote
06-24-2017 , 07:18 AM
What should happen is that tables which are 2-3 handed should be merged together as would happen in a 6-max tournament.

Or if that is difficult, where there are 2-3 people at a table and none of them are in the queue, and there are free spaces at other tables, close the table and return them to the queue (it's already bad that someone who ends up alone at a table is booted back to the menu rather than added to the queue) and let the existing software place them where they can go.
[Unibet] Official Thread Quote
06-24-2017 , 08:28 AM
I've played with UbinetAndrew yesterday. I loled
[Unibet] Official Thread Quote
06-24-2017 , 08:39 AM
Im a mtt player so great to hear the tournament schedule will be improved.

For me the site with the best tournament schedule and online series are winamax which is annoying as i cant play being in the uk.I hope maybe you could use some of their ideas to help towards building your own daily schedule and specially your sunday specials.
[Unibet] Official Thread Quote
06-24-2017 , 09:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LektorAJ
What should happen is that tables which are 2-3 handed should be merged together as would happen in a 6-max tournament.

Or if that is difficult, where there are 2-3 people at a table and none of them are in the queue, and there are free spaces at other tables, close the table and return them to the queue (it's already bad that someone who ends up alone at a table is booted back to the menu rather than added to the queue) and let the existing software place them where they can go.
i'm not in the table merge camp, if you play like 6+ tables and tables get merged at random it would be difficult to keep track of who you have history with etc.
just let the 2-3 handed tables die off, they end up in a vicious cirle where they never get full players, those players that are trapped there can fill up 4+ seated tables instead. just let the 2-3 handed tables die by not letting players join it.

So always prioritize 5 handed tables then 4 handed tables, if none of those have free seats,
let people join 3 handed table and prioritize that table with new players untill its in the 5-6 handed camp.
this way there should be more 5-6 handed tables and less 2-4 handed ones. also unibet could close tables that run heads up, normally people who stick around to play headsup are the ones that are causing this problem becouse people constantly leave that table and get reseated.

Last edited by tompoker; 06-24-2017 at 09:37 AM.
[Unibet] Official Thread Quote
06-24-2017 , 11:21 AM
That feeling when you get cr on turn holding set of aces and client crashes.
[Unibet] Official Thread Quote
06-24-2017 , 11:37 AM
Hi guys. What sort of cashback/rakeback can be expected to offset the holy crap 6% rake at 100nl+?
[Unibet] Official Thread Quote
06-24-2017 , 01:27 PM
Hey, Andrew or anybody on the Unibet team. Can you answer a question regarding PT4. Obviously it doesn't work with Unibet client, but are accounts at risk of getting closed if we are using PT4 for playing on other sites while playing on Unibet?
[Unibet] Official Thread Quote

      
m