Possible scam at online sportsbooks' poker sites? - Page 3 - Internet Poker

no not everything but this there is a good chance. The reason is because it has already happen once. You think UB were only ones cheating. If it happen once will happen again that is proven fact my friend. It kind of like having a sexy ass girl that cheated on you once but says they wont do it again. Then you hear lots of rumors but no proof like pictures.... she cheated once she will do it again(or like i am saying more likely to.

Quote

08-24-2014 , 03:43 PM

#52

JarrydKnight

centurion

Join Date: Mar 2014 Posts: 148

Oh yeah be honest if something came out in next few years online was BS you wouldnt be shocked.

Quote

08-24-2014 , 03:52 PM

#53

Monteroy

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 16,729

I have offered a $5,000 reward for definitive proof of a rigged RnG at anty major site for a long time, so if one was proven to be rigged in that matter I would be very surprised.

Would I be surprised if some companies do bad things liek steal customers money?: No, because that happens in all industries.

Am I going to worry about what every nut job says might happen? I will pass on that, but you can support them if you like.

You have a nice simplistic, binary view of the world, and I know I cannot change that, but I can have some fun with it.

All the best.

Quote

08-24-2014 , 03:56 PM

#54

Last Laugh

grinder

Join Date: Apr 2014 Posts: 429

Quote:

Originally Posted by JarrydKnight

If the crazy guy on the corner yelling at the clouds has a "good chance" of being right (whatever that means), then there is probably no use going on with this conversation. However, it does make me wonder about your ability to grasp the concept of probability. Wanna play poker?

Last edited by Last Laugh; 08-24-2014 at 03:57 PM. Reason: 72 offsuit has a good chance of beating aces, after all

Quote

08-24-2014 , 03:59 PM

#55

JarrydKnight

centurion

Join Date: Mar 2014 Posts: 148

no my key to understanding things is to be able to see and argue both sides . The only way to truly understand something is to be able to argue both sides my friend. Just like in poker you have to see your cards and understand villains thinking. Just agreeing or not is very primal thinking. You must advance your thought process.

Quote

08-24-2014 , 04:03 PM

#56

JarrydKnight

centurion

Join Date: Mar 2014 Posts: 148

When I said there was a chance I was not talking about you guy on corner please realize I was still talking about online scams

Quote

08-24-2014 , 04:05 PM

#57

JarrydKnight

centurion

Join Date: Mar 2014 Posts: 148

Quote:

Originally Posted by Last Laugh

Before you make a comment please reread things... nothing wrong with checking twice

Quote

08-24-2014 , 04:21 PM

#58

Monteroy

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 16,729

There are millions of various conspiracy theories out there. Let us know how it goes checking all of them twice. As you say, nothing wrong with that.

Here is someone who believes that aliens control mankind.

http://www.sherryshriner.com/sherry/reality.htm

She starts her manifesto with this

If you sit back and analyze how things are run, one thing is evident: That power on earth is in the hands of a nefarious few and they are not human.

There is certainly a chance she is correct, so perhaps you should read all of her works to better consider both sides of that debate, since that is really the only way you can understand it. Do not disagree with it immediately without doing that, because as you say, that would be primal thinking. Use this example to show us how you can advance your thought process, and after that you have a few million more theories to go!

All the best.

Quote

08-24-2014 , 04:35 PM

#59

JarrydKnight

centurion

Join Date: Mar 2014 Posts: 148

One thing I know about when arguing with someone you keep bringing up things that are far fetch . But my examples are things that have happen over and over again. My examples are simple for a reason . Because our argument is something that action is not considered to be that far fetched. So if you want to give better examples besides flying monsters then I am willing to talk about that. You actually completely ignored my last statement which means you really have no other argument besides the simple fact you don't believe in something so that is that. I think what you were accusing me of is what you are doing .( Having a simple view on a subject)

Quote

08-24-2014 , 04:38 PM

#60

JarrydKnight

centurion

Join Date: Mar 2014 Posts: 148

Also just for the record I do not believe online poker is rigged , but if I am wrong I am not surprised . The key in online poker rigged or not is to know when the heck to fold even if its rigged, so just to let you know because a game is rigged towards the house does not mean it cant be beaten .

Quote

08-24-2014 , 04:58 PM

#61

Monteroy

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 16,729

Quote:

Originally Posted by JarrydKnight

One thing I know about when arguing with someone you keep bringing up things that are far fetch . But my examples are things that have happen over and over again.

Actually, no significant poker site has been discovered to have a rigged RnG in any way, shape or form as the OP suggests (except Planet Poker which was never exploited), so the odds of that actually happening, while not being detected, nor told by insiders is indeed far fetched.

If all your point is that some businesses are run badly and steal from customers, then whatever, that happens in all industries and is a part of the human condition, and that still does not mean that every theory some random dude says needs to be investigated.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JarrydKnight

My examples are simple for a reason . Because our argument is something that action is not considered to be that far fetched. So if you want to give better examples besides flying monsters then I am willing to talk about that. You actually completely ignored my last statement which means you really have no other argument besides the simple fact you don't believe in something so that is that. I think what you were accusing me of is what you are doing .( Having a simple view on a subject)

Quote

08-24-2014 , 05:10 PM

#62

JarrydKnight

centurion

Join Date: Mar 2014 Posts: 148

http://www.random.org/faq/#Q2.1 please take a look at this . If you want to find out if there is a way to test rng randomness you cant. Sorry to burst your bubble

Quote

08-24-2014 , 05:35 PM

#63

Monteroy

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 16,729

Stop going after bubbles and get proof of a rigged RnG at any major site and claim my $5,000 reward.

Feel free to ask in the stats forum if your beliefs and interpretations about randomness are correct, to make sure your own bubble is secure.

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/25/probability/

Also, get back to me with a report on all of those riggie theories, that should all be considered by you...

All the best.

Quote

Page 3 of 3

First

1 2 3

Last

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 3 of 3

First

1 2 3

Last