Quote:
Originally Posted by diss1
I am a long time pokerstars player, originally was a cash player and when that wasnt allowed anymore in the USA I started to play playchips.
Firstly, I am sorry that your emails have not been responded to. Please send me a private message with your Stars ID or email address and I will look into why this has happened. If you are unable to send a private message, please email
billion@pokerstars.net directly.
Secondly, I’d like to address the question about the rake.
This post in 2014 explained it pretty well, and essentially the situation remains the same. The most important thing to us is to ensure that players see the value of their chip purchases and winnings maintained over time. If we did not rake the games, then the liquidity at the low and medium stakes would very quickly dry up as the average and median balance moved higher and higher. This would be really bad for almost all players.
One thing that has significantly changed since that earlier post linked above is the number of free chips we add compared to 2014/2015.
For example, we are now giving over a thousand Billionaire Club members weekly benefits (free chips and tournament tickets) to the value of over five million chips per month, which is almost a 20% increase on last year. We also give Club members daily bonuses on chips purchases of an additional 10-15%.
During the
Elite Series earlier this year we gave away many billions of chips in overlay, satellite overlay, free tickets, leaderboard prizes, and VIP freerolls, and every month since March we have run
a high-stakes tournament leaderboard with almost two billion chips in prizes each month.
On top of this, over the coming months we also plan on increasing the number of free chips that ALL players receive on a daily basis, and not limiting free chips to players with zero balances.
We think that these things make the games more fun and rewarding for players, but all add more and more chips to the economy, and put them in the hands of active players. There are no cashouts of play chips, so to ensure the economy doesn’t overinflate we have to have the rake set at a sustainable level. The alternative is to have lower rake, but no promotions, leaderboards, or chip bonuses. We think this is less fun for players.
While admittedly this means that some players may go bust a little quicker, the net effect will be that a lot more players will get more chips and have a more enjoyable poker experience at all stakes.
I hope this explains our reasoning.
Last edited by PokerStars Michael J; 06-15-2016 at 05:54 AM.