Sounds pretty std for pp, I emailed them a polite "why I'm leaving" email after they swapped to weighted contrib from dealt rake (raping the grinders) n got ignored lolololol

I guess was coz their usual response is a copy paste "the technical fault is at ur end not pp....what 3rd p software do u use?" so the monkeys there wer all

GG

Last time I reported colluders it took ~1 month to get them banned

Ok, i got contacted by someone from pokerstrategy and he told me they had good relations with party poker and they will help solving this problem. I had to send them names that I was sure about they were involved. I gave them the most recent names I was 100% sure about, but i can't provide a full complete list of all names, since i don't have a SS license and i can only see about 80 games in pokerprolabs, like everyone else.

It would be really nice if somebody would give us a complete list of names that were involved, but you don't have to do this if you don't want, because this is something PP should do and should already have been done.

These are the names I am currently aware of:

A7jasmill7
colinpos40
colinpos45
oake0sdro
strongvads18
KunsWif4
mourblant87
bavilok71
suprobalt61

What saddens me is that **** like that happens all the time, and still, there is a bunch of players that defends with all his powers that it's important to pay all the rake we pay, to feel safe that the room is secure and all that bs... Important to these lazy rake rapers fill their pockets if anything...

Couple of older (probably defunct, but may get reactivated) accounts:

cenupor
qirexig
baroni5qoa
demorret36

I have to ask reading earlier made me think about a certain player are these stats possilbe at HU?

9,817

$7

$39

32% ROI

$65,717

Hot

92

PokerStars

Not quite sure how someone would collude HU.......

Never said collude, but someone said earliers that roi isnt possible?

maybe he is playing the "slow" SNG's with no blind increase.
people accidentally register for these or they underestimate the time they can take. People normally sit out after some hours or ship every hand. There was a thread somewhere on 2+2 about this.

You can't ban players 4 life cuz it's just to easy to use another laptop or friends name it's real simple and like another poster said you can even change your screen name everymonth if you got caught once already.

Did you read everything ?
Even if you did, i don't know what you would suggest other than a lifeban at Partypoker. He was not playing some cheeseburger stakes with his friends laptop you know.

remember the DoN scandal?

There should be a new poker statement:

- If you dont cheat the others somebody else on your table will do it for you ...


I´m so glad i quit playing poker for a living over a year ago and just play for a bit additional income nowadays...

i sent party email about this, they just answered that they dont comment about the cases to outsiders

are they still playing?

Ok these are all the names that came to my attention of his last 95 games.
Notice the names with 2numbers behind it ... Seems to be a lot right.
I'm sure there are a lot of names that are not involved and it could be I missed a couple names. But i could only use pokerprolabs and I noticed every name that has a N/A rating or like very low rating that played multiple games with farafon111 on different hours/stakes. I know that a lot of these names have played a lot of games but unfortunately pokerprolabs only has a fraction of that and for that reason he has a N/A rating. So somebody with sharkscope license could doublecheck all the names i'm not sure about and save a lot of time for those last 95 games.
Those are just the names that need to be checked by PartyPoker, sorry if your name is in that list and you have nothing to do with it.


exemp0tion
fordencv3y
BastiLeipzig sure
rurmqads
licynic
SevAdorn7
Nalumz53
flipp64
SevAdorn7
Nordokamot
DjangoCCC
sabasold5
goviraker42
iboKahad sure
Fellygumz2
DGklons
mackie19883
saqalikitaaq
any4raise
agrajra
vadisbaboy64 sure
charatan166
Akentaro58
BadgerMO sure
sandmanlu
owe0nsking sure
ChefGene1972
ruyval
wiggles1691
identpl
pipsaryf93 sure
pLANIERraupe
Blowie333
buridager54 sure
minit3
neomogget30 sure
holdplzz
facebarmer78 sure
facebarmer40 sure ( fail )
stonefag79
hu_now
storfinger95 sure
storfinger21 sure ( fail again )
buridager26 sure
maintuik25 sure
jaydaman68
lifter55
beejay1003
vla58
daprofi_t73
Raytje001
Burgio555
Tjide
etoda
clipright
zsuzskapoker
gerwin71
TiVo0x00
zahranaso
allan1444
bozobaker
noatakk
friedas
DEAD73
Klawdenio4
skitzo793
bubsy87
Sjakiej
Doapgool8
dima_1962

And these we already know and agree on;
A7jasmill7 sure
colinpos40 sure
colinpos45 sure
oake0sdro sure
strongvads18 sure
KunsWif4 sure
mourblant87 sure
bavilok71 sure
suprobalt61 sure ( It seems this was not his latest creation, found a game from 3 october with him )

And these i can't confirm myself ( my free searches are all used ) but I trust Gazillion;

cenupor
qirexig
baroni5qoa
demorret36

The first image shows us with how many accounts he sometimes played with. I think there were 4 players on that screen that were all the same player. Except for Paulromme and TehilFC.

The second image is just a big fail.

ironman, I can try to confirm some of those other names if you like?

nice work guys, hopefully PP does something about this soon, pretty failworthy so far!

Yes that would be very nice

Edit;
It's gonna be hella of a lot work to do this for over 850 games. Now you have an idea of how many accounts he created. But with a toptop investigation team like PP, they prob do this in a hour.
Or maybe they have the tools to find this in an other way.

exemp0tion - confirmed
fordencv3y - only 1 game so hard to confirm
BastiLeipzig - very unlikely imo - has played the wrong spread of buyins and too many games without farafon111 at the table
rurmqads & licynic - probable but strange. only 2 games at 2 diff buyins, and only 1 with game each with farafon111. They both played a $3 6m and a $22 6m, for a total spend of $25 each. I don't know of any offers for a free $25 on Party, but if they're out there, then this could explain it.
SevAdorn7 & Nalumz53 - hard to confirm but reasonably likely.


have to go do some other stuff for a while - will try to check some more later.

Yes that bastileipzig, i think you are right. Pretty sure all the other names i have "sure" behind are 100% correct. That Leipzig guy was just coincidence.
I used an other laptop for free searches again and you are right.
At pokerprolabs bastileipzig has played 5 games ( 6$HU, 6$ 6max, 11$ 6max, 22$ 6max, $10 6max ) and his first game was a $6 HU. So I immidiately thought he was involved without watching at the players he played with to save some time.
Sharkscope shows he played 22 games and indeed all the wrong BI so that's why i needed a doublecheck with sharkscope Good job gazillion.

great work guys

where the fk is the party rep

Busy telling everybody that Party's memory leak is because of Holdem Manager.

idiot

idiot

major idiot