Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > Internet Poker > Internet Poker

Notices

Internet Poker Discussions of Internet poker venues.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-26-2011, 01:17 AM   #271
stranger
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1
Re: PartyPoker 839 turbo STTs, ROI : 66%. Must be nice.. (MN: cheating uncovered)

I've been railing this thread somewhat eagerly, as Partypoker has been my go-to site for random poker playing after FTP got shut down.

What I can't understand is the profit-making part. Obviously there's some abuse of no-deposit bonuses in play in this case, but if that weren't the case. How can colluders make profit in 6max-games? Say 3 guys team up and register for one game, they've paid 3 buyins + rake. Best case scenario, they win 6 buyins. They'd have to be winning way more than half the time to be profitable, right? Sounds like an awful lot of trouble for little to no profit.

Could someone with a better understanding of maths tell me what I'm missing?

Not to step on anyone's feet, but if all the profit comes from the no-deposits, how does it hurt the other players?
frankiess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2011, 01:48 AM   #272
Thailand Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Finn Land
Posts: 6,008
Re: PartyPoker 839 turbo STTs, ROI : 66%. Must be nice.. (MN: cheating uncovered)

maybe you should read the thread that you have been so eagerly railing
Lessu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2011, 01:55 AM   #273
banned
 
Samdk77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Catching fish
Posts: 944
Re: PartyPoker 839 turbo STTs, ROI : 66%. Must be nice.. (MN: cheating uncovered)

Quote:
Originally Posted by frankiess View Post
I've been railing this thread somewhat eagerly, as Partypoker has been my go-to site for random poker playing after FTP got shut down.

What I can't understand is the profit-making part. Obviously there's some abuse of no-deposit bonuses in play in this case, but if that weren't the case. How can colluders make profit in 6max-games? Say 3 guys team up and register for one game, they've paid 3 buyins + rake. Best case scenario, they win 6 buyins. They'd have to be winning way more than half the time to be profitable, right? Sounds like an awful lot of trouble for little to no profit.

Could someone with a better understanding of maths tell me what I'm missing?

Not to step on anyone's feet, but if all the profit comes from the no-deposits, how does it hurt the other players?
Just knowing more than your own holecards at a table gives you an edge. Knowing others holecards+colluding gives you an even bigger edge, hence making it harder for the players that only knows their own cards to win. That can't be too difficult to understand.
Samdk77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2011, 08:45 PM   #274
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Gazillion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: volume failing
Posts: 8,724
Re: PartyPoker 839 turbo STTs, ROI : 66%. Must be nice.. (MN: cheating uncovered)

Frankiess - it wasn't 3 guys teaming up - it was 1 guy controlling 3 accounts, and every account he operated was originally funded with free "getting started" money from someplace or other, which explains why some accounts had such short shelf lives. The occasional HU games between various complicit accounts pretty much removes any doubt that this is exactly what was going on.

Luckily for you though, Party Poker is so on the case when it comes to game security that it only took about 3 months and intense pressure from this thread and other places for them to put a stop to this wilful violation of their rules.
Gazillion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2011, 12:17 AM   #275
one time Plz???
 
IamPro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: OUT YOUR POCKET MOOOTTTHAAA ****AAA
Posts: 17,395
Re: PartyPoker 839 turbo STTs, ROI : 66%. Must be nice.. (MN: cheating uncovered)

And this is why I don't play on Party Poker, not just the cheating but the lack of action and response on this
IamPro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2011, 12:54 AM   #276
journeyman
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 301
Re: 839 turbo STTs, ROI : 66%. Must be nice...

Quote:
Originally Posted by IAMIRONMAN View Post
Not possible to run that good. Party Poker is far from soft these days.
Send a mail to PP please, because i also play STT at party and i don't want to play against superusers. Will send a mail too.
Also look at the last games he played. ( pokerprolabs ) He cashes 71% at the $55 level 6handed, seriously we got one.

Edit: I talked to one of the employees of part p and they told me they will investigate this within 48h. Standard response offc.
Good job for finding this guy !
has anyone ever played online poker here? no matter how good you are if accounts are not jacked up with the rng the way it is its impossible to run this good ESPECIALLY playing heads up with more * variance *
hellojello is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2011, 01:08 AM   #277
journeyman
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 301
Re: PartyPoker 839 turbo STTs, ROI : 66%. Must be nice.. (MN: cheating uncovered)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gazillion View Post
Frankiess - it wasn't 3 guys teaming up - it was 1 guy controlling 3 accounts, and every account he operated was originally funded with free "getting started" money from someplace or other, which explains why some accounts had such short shelf lives. The occasional HU games between various complicit accounts pretty much removes any doubt that this is exactly what was going on.

Luckily for you though, Party Poker is so on the case when it comes to game security that it only took about 3 months and intense pressure from this thread and other places for them to put a stop to this wilful violation of their rules.
Why do sites even have rules in place if they are not enforced by themselves. So sick of feeling like a burden asking sites to look in to stuff. How many of these cheaters would get away with things if diligent players weren't looking in to things supposid * professionals* at there jobs can't find with supposid * advanced* technolgies. Just a lot of smokescreen and propaganda to try and make us feel safe. REGULATIONs! REGULATIONS! Please!! Honestly. Take the promotions money pokersites you give out to people that break rules , take ALL the promotional money and hire an adequate number of cheating detection systems. 99% of the players will welcome this. What do I give a **** if I win 100$ bonus money if a robot is going to steal it from me a week later.

Just imagine though how much cheating went on before some of you diligent players brought attention to this. It's like being a security guard in a BMW dealership. Only there is one guard and 50,0000 cameras to watch. Hire some more ****ing staff. Get off of coastal islands with 25 people for hire and move to populations where you can hire appropriate numbers to police this cheating god dammit!
hellojello is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2011, 02:35 AM   #278
one time Plz???
 
IamPro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: OUT YOUR POCKET MOOOTTTHAAA ****AAA
Posts: 17,395
Re: PartyPoker 839 turbo STTs, ROI : 66%. Must be nice.. (MN: cheating uncovered)

Def agree these sites need to be a lot more professional when it comes to security
IamPro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2011, 11:47 AM   #279
banned
 
Bukoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: House
Posts: 671
Re: PartyPoker 839 turbo STTs, ROI : 66%. Must be nice.. (MN: cheating uncovered)

it's so obvious that the collusion ring is ran by the SECURITY department. How else do you explain the incompetence?

Last edited by Bukoo; 11-27-2011 at 12:06 PM.
Bukoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2011, 03:56 PM   #280
journeyman
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 301
Re: PartyPoker 839 turbo STTs, ROI : 66%. Must be nice.. (MN: cheating uncovered)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bukoo View Post
it's so obvious that the collusion ring is ran by the SECURITY department. How else do you explain the incompetence?
would seem like it huh? Only lets be honest at best how many people work in security at a time. 5, 6, 10. That might be an exaggeration. It's been said that stars got so busy an ex staff member said they actually had to turn off the alerts they are so overwhelmed. U got 80k-200 plus players at a time and god knows how many alerts you just cant cope its that simple. And even when they do find something or have evidence thrown up there arse like the chinese colluders it takes them months and months and still couldn't find them without the work of players and another datamining site. Just rubbish
hellojello is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2011, 11:48 PM   #281
Thailand Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Finn Land
Posts: 6,008
Re: PartyPoker 839 turbo STTs, ROI : 66%. Must be nice.. (MN: cheating uncovered)

the security department isnt smart enough to know how to collude
Lessu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2011, 01:07 AM   #282
banned
 
Enervate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: My logic is undeniable
Posts: 3,070
Re: PartyPoker 839 turbo STTs, ROI : 66%. Must be nice.. (MN: cheating uncovered)

CLIFFS?
Enervate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2011, 07:57 AM   #283
temp-banned
 
omnimirage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: you're wrong cause I'm always right
Posts: 2,280
Re: PartyPoker 839 turbo STTs, ROI : 66%. Must be nice.. (MN: cheating uncovered)

cannot be bothered reading whole thread, cliffs?
omnimirage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2011, 08:03 AM   #284
adept
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,021
Re: PartyPoker 839 turbo STTs, ROI : 66%. Must be nice.. (MN: cheating uncovered)

Quote:
Originally Posted by pat3392 View Post
cannot be bothered reading whole thread, cliffs?
Party doesn't care at all about the integrity of its games, play there at your own risks.
2DMB2LIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2011, 08:10 AM   #285
Pooh-Bah
 
jspill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,351
Re: PartyPoker 839 turbo STTs, ROI : 66%. Must be nice.. (MN: cheating uncovered)

rough cliffs:

- one account had impossible ROI
- was cheating by getting free $50 from pokerstrategy, dump to other accounts by colluding in 6max SNGs, repeat. party has zero security checks to notice or stop this
- confirmed as many accounts only played once or twice with him in the game, or played him HU, etc
- party support is even lazier than people that can't skim-read 280 posts and takes months to shut down his acct
- acct now shut down, party doesn't respond to criticism/process refunds
jspill is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive