Quote:
Originally Posted by teddyFBI
Just grunching, altho I think I get the gist of this thread.
My own experience...about 8 months ago I got a phone call from a very gruff Pacific representative. I hadn't played there in a few months, but still had around 20K online.
He very bluntly told me that if I didn't log in regularly (he may have said i had to PLAY, but I'm not sure...pretty sure he just said 'log in'), then they would simply take my 20K balance and not return it. As surprising as it was to hear that, I was even more taken aback by his tone...his words were literally: "If you log in, everything will be fine; if you don't, then bye-bye money.". Anyway, I logged in that day and withdrew it all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nofx Fan
wtf witch is it? Is it simply "log in" or is it "log in and play a hand"? Or, are they going to tell you exactly witch after the fact, say, to a person who has logged in once every 6 months.
Come on, now: I clearly wrote in my post (re-copied above) that I only THOUGHT he said I just had to log in but that he MAY have said I actually had to play...so there's no real inconsistency there...completely possible he said "play", as I more than made clear.
But still: complete joke of a reply:
1) As already mentioned, why is all the 'security' stuff moot if I log in and play a $0.01 / $0.02 microstakes hand every 5.5 months?
2) Why don't other operators have an uncapped 10% penalty??
3) And you wrote:
Quote:
We are licensed to be a gaming operator, not a bank where we hold the funds forever.
Fair enough >> so
just cash the player's entire balance out to his preferred cashout method after 6 months. What possible rationale is there to just palm it for 888???? You write also that you need
"a policy which deters customers from leaving money with us without playing with it." You don't think you can come up with a deterrent that's a smidge more proportional??