Quote:
Originally Posted by meandi289
So if there are 100 people trading to this extent, the respected person holds $100,000 as "insurance", possibly for months on end?
Yes, if there are 100 people buying $ 1000 insurance, the respected person holds $ 100,000. Moreover, if the respected person ask to deposit by usd in bitcoin and bitcoin is likely to go up, then the respected person can earn lots of profit without doing much
Yes, and he can make a lot more profit by leaving with the money, never to be seen again. That's the big risk with this idea - you're concentrating a lot of money in one person's hands.
Quote:
Originally Posted by meandi289
Surely, if there was such a respected person here it would be far simpler just to ask them to escrow, (with delays built in to avoid fraud by stolen credit card, etc)
No, because the respected person wastes his time to escrow, he just holds the money and does nothing except that if a scam , for expamle, of $ 500 is claimed then he gives back to money to the vicim. In short, the respected person who holds the fund never give more than what he has received
Yes, there is a clear benefit in that as a trader, I can just deposit some money with one person and then trade to my heart's content. The downside is that I have to tie up a significant amount of money, which might not be feasible for everyone. And of course the issue I mentioned above.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sovietplayer
Bobo,
What I am saying is have a person who is extremely respectable and has accounts on all sites act as a processor, for a small fee of course, set up maybe some kind of restrictions to limit the scammers. I think even poker sites would be happy as they are getting another deposit method, without worrying about scams.
What meandie289 is saying in other words people should post for trades, Like posting with a bookie.
Well, it shouldn't be baffling that no one has thought of it before, because it's been suggested, in different forms, many times. No one's acted on the idea, which should tell you a lot. The risk/reward ratio is out of whack unless someone charges a sizable fee IMO.
And if you mean that no one has proposed meandi's idea before, that may be true - it does seem like a new twist on using a third party.
And to be clear, I'm not trying to tell you guys that no other solution is possible. meandi's idea isn't without merit, and I think coming up with new ways of doing this isn't a bad thing. But there are also significant challenges here. In the end, it comes down to having a third party that is willing to take it on, and people who would then be willing to try it out.
But it should also be noted that even if we had the ingredients above, I don't know that it's something we would allow on our forums. While I'm sure we have a few posters that handle a lot of transactions and make money off this, we discourage people from outright advertising money trading businesses. A scenario where we have one trusted party that is processing transactions would likely fall into that category. I'm not saying that it would be impossible for someone to offer such a service on our forums (but it may be); just letting you know that it's another hurdle to overcome, if you can even get interest.
Another thing to consider - most experienced traders on our forums are able to make dozens of trades and never have a problem (or a low % of problems), so they're least likely to be interested in such a service. That makes it difficult for such a service to get traction. And, more importantly, it means that those who would be using the service most would be the ones with the highest risk profile, meaning one would need to charge a higher % to offer said service.