Originally Posted by skunkybud
Lets see the proof. Simply put up or shut up. I play(well, try to play) on PPN and would like to see what you are calling proof.
i actually sent an email asking for the pics but all i got was one pic which didn't show anything but some irrelevant chat.
the only specifice accusation was something about chip dumping. if i am not a third player on a chip dumping table i don't see why i should care. If they are dumping chips why wouldn't they be on a heads up table? the only concern i see with chip dumping is about money laundering, which i view as the site's concern, not mine, unless it results in being beat out of a rake race.
i don't think her post deserves any more attention and it is just as well that it was deleted. it belongs in the rigged thread, if anywhere, with all the other silly baseless posts (i'm just assuming, i've never read the thread).
although PPN has plenty of screwups there are only 3 things i have noticed which could arguably be considered the least bit improper: one is the accuracy of their rake points counts compared to the daily leaderboard list a record keeping disparity; the other is the distribution of the prize from a malfunctioning promotion event, which can objectively viewed differently by reasonable people -no big deal. the third is the existence of a house player, which i do not like but which is not necessarily improper.
It is possible that what she saw is the house player making weird or illogical plays. If the house player is not playing with his own money then don't be surprised if he makes unusual plays. this often looks suspicious. What i don't like about the house player is that i figure if anyone has the ability to cheat it would be him.