Quote:
Originally Posted by Triptanes
Almost positive they don't exist. I think the cheapest "regular" tournament you can play is the $3 1R 1A. I don't think rebuy or reentries are gimmicks (you're basically paying a premium for more chippers), but it'd be nice to have some FOs.
I think it'd be great to see like a $3, $5, and $10 FO.
"Gimmick" wasn't a good word choice. What I should have said is that freezeout MTTs and regular one-table SNGs are the tournament staples on any poker site, and you build from that.
You're right that the $3.30 + $3 + $3 is the cheapest tournament on the site. And the structure has some quirks that make it much different than playing a straight freezeout:
1.
Sometime during level 1 you have to have less than the 1,500 starting chips to get the 1,500 chip rebuy. I have limp/folded the first hand on purpose to make sure I get the extra 1,500 chips. Also, what if level 1 is almost done and you have only won 100 chips, moving your stack up to 1,600. Do you dump 100 chips before the end of the level so that you can start level 2 with at around 3,000 chips? What if you would have to purposely lose 200 chips? 400?
2.
If you click to get the automatic add-on of 3,000 chips, those chips aren't added to your stack until after the first break. So let's say it's early in the last level before break, I have enough chips for 3 orbits before I blind out, and I pick up A
J
UTG.
Normally, being that short with a hand that strong would be an automatic shove. If you play that hand and lose, you're out of the tournament. But if you fold your way to the break, you would be almost completely out of chips at the end of hour one, but as soon as the second hour starts, you have 3,000 more chips in your stack.
In this situation, if you decide that AJs isn't good enough, what hands do you play? Do you fold AKo preflop? TT? Aces?
Situations like these give 2+2ers an advantage, because we think about those things, and fish don't. A lot of us see structural quirks in a tournament as an interesting math and theory problem. But it is no good for the poker economy to have, at the lowest buy-in,
only tournaments like this, which are strategically complex and even counterintuitive to the fish, not to mention expensive,
In this thread I have stated my belief that most beginners who can't afford to deposit
at least $100 are going to get blown off the site pretty quickly. That's a shame, because it took me 3 months to lose my first $50 on PokerStars playing $1 SNGs. After those 3 months, I thought that I had learned enough to give it one more try with another very precious $50. If I had started with $50 on ACR in 2012 with what I knew in 2006, I would have been broke pretty quickly, probably never to play poker again.
Last edited by Poker Clif; 07-25-2012 at 12:16 PM.
Reason: Reworded for grammar and clarity. No significant content change.