Quote:
Originally Posted by demute
Hello 888Rep
Are you aware of a fact that people use Hand2Note to get HUD working on SNAP tables? And it does not seem that 888 worries about it.
Why don't you allow HUD for everyone or ban HUD for everyone making hand history saves in SNAP forbidden or anonymous and go after people who will use screen grabber software like they do at PartyPoker nowadays? Or at least constantly monitor new programs to obtain unfair advantage at SNAP tables, ban it at SNAP and warn/ban/seize those players who keep exploiting your system with this kind of software?
Instead of forbidding only HM2, which creates an unequal advantage for those ethically flexible people who install Hand2Note and other hand-made apps to play on SNAP?
P.S. here is one more hand-made software that makes HUD at SNAP and Blast possible (Russian language)
I find it very sad that you kinda do not enter this discussion other with the typical phrase "I will send this issue over".
I have brought this aspect to your attention about 9 months ago, even per pm.
And it seems there is no interest to fix this situation.
That results in in customers who do not want to break 888-rules to either break them or like me to stop playing snap for the most part which results in a lower overall volume at 888.
The situation is currently following:
1.) 2 of the 3 most popular and common user DB-tools do offer Huds at snap.
2.) Only for HM2 is not available, but there are programs out who would make a hud visible.
3.) 888 does not want to make it 10% clear , apparently, if a Hud on snap is now forbidden or not
4.) Imo 888 cannot deny ppl using Huds at snap, apparnetly
-> Hence imo 888 should make a Hud also for HM2 possible to not put HM2-customers in comparison to customers who use one of the 2 other popular tools , at a disadvantage.
It is a very frustrating and unfair situation + the fact that 888 does seemingly not really care about that unfairness is to be honest difficult to accept
Another question:
Does 888 offer now a 2step-log-in-methode/authentication?
I have read something about this on one of the last pages, but was not sure if that was related to the client itself.
Best Regards,
Zrebna