No, I wasn't say it was but I wasnt saying it wasnt.

Who said they were rigging it?

That was just an example of my maddness. I had those saved in a document.

Doesnt matter what stakes, same ending.

Good work though detective Gadget.

Calling someone a ****** is one thing but mocking mentally handicapped people is disgusting.

Be proud you loser.

I see. I know what, why don't you come back when you have made up your mind. Otherwise I'm getting confused as to exactly what the **** you are saying.

go go gadget lock thread

and its inspector gadget jackass

I used to love him

to be truthful all these sites is rigged for some and rigged against others its based on the rake u make for the site if u make alot of rake then they give them cards if ur a new comer then u def lose i emailed them before about this its def rigged for the regular players i know this for a fact all of these sites is scum in my eyes

Thanks for that very insightful post.

This runs contrary to the opinion that most rigged conspiracy theorists have that they rig the games for the newcomers who are bad players to keep them in the action while the more experienced players who are better are the ones who take the worst of the beats.

I enjoy how the new players who didn't win at first conclude that it is rigged against all new players and how some bad players who won some at first and then lost later conclude that the site did that to them too.



I don't think 'fact' means what you think it is.
It is your opinion and is a pretty stupid one at that.
It isn't anywhere close to being a fact. Your claim that it is a fact would be supported if you had ANY evidence. Since we all know that you don't then it can't be a fact and you sound really dumb for just blindly claiming that is.

Sorry you suck at poker and can't win. But that doesn't make it the sites' fault.

I'm proud of anyone who can elicit such a response.

If that kind of humor offends you, the interwebs in general and this forum in particular aren't for you.

I'm saying I take more beats then I should.

I cannot explain why but I can show proof.

I'm not saying its "rigged" against me.

Its either black or white for you guys, right?

Internet or not loser, it's disgusting.

Do you think the interweb is make believe and you're talking to bytes?

Matrix style?

Okay, I'm done with this thread.

Continue being sub human waste.

Have a good night.

wow. good post!



honorable mention: where you posted several raw hand histories. too bad they don't have a 2nd place prize for that.

Thx OP. I have posted over 80 times today so far, and this thread made me LOFL.

[ ] punctuation
[ ] capitalization
[ ] sentences
[ ] intelligence
[ ] fact

[ ] proof

what, those 6 or so hands he posted above weren't enough for you? jeez!

1. You are certain it's rigged because of how good and bad some players run
2. You don't know how to prove it.

How can these two statements co-exist? (How can you be "certain" something is true if you don't understand what would make that something true?)

Also, you will not be able to 'prove' any thing without at least something like their code base, which may not even be sufficient. You could however strongly support or counter the theory through statistical analysis.

I pray you are just a troll because your post is so bad it makes my head hurt.

Oh, and notice I not once have commented on the theory that stars is rigged, just your appalling logic.

Also, here is how you test your theory: use the scientific method. Quick overview, starting with the step where you formulate a theory (which you already have):
Formulate theory (e.g Stars is rigged so some people win more than they should and some people lose more than they should)
Derive novel implications from this theory to make predictions (in this case those predictions are that an unusually high number of people will run abnormally above and below expectation).
Design an experiment to test prediction (in this case your experiment is really just data collection)
Execute experiment and collect data.
Analyze data with respect to predictions (this is where you run all the statistics)
support or reject theory based on analysis.

Key points to theories and experiments:
Unlike in math, in science there are no laws. Everything is just a theory and observation trumps all. (Newton's theory of gravity, for instance, was found to be incorrect (i.e. observation was inconsistent with predictions based on it) which lead to Einsteins theory of general relativity, which has yet to disagree with observation afaik.)
Experiments should be repeatable. Anyone should be able to take your experiment write up and reproduce and achieve similar results. Think of this as QA.

I don't know why I bothered writing all this, either.

That wouldn't be the case if you had signed up with me. Plus, all the novelty ice cream you can eat!

"The Only Poker Affiliate That Rigs Sites and Pays You in Ice Cream Sandwiches!"

iplay27 - exactly how many beats SHOULD you be taking?
If you don't know the answer to this then you can't know that you take more than that.