Quote:
Originally Posted by sayid_the_saviour
Thanks for the response. The answer is interesting and a bit surprising, to me, at least. It sounds like if the skin is a small one, they do not process payments to players NOR do they hold the players funds. If the skin is a larger one and they want to take more responsibility onto themselves, for profits and better service, they can hold the players funds and/or process payments themselves. Is this correct?
1. Yes, so if the network site, any of them, do not do their own processing, then the network itself has segregated and holds the player funds for them.
2. It is not necessarily a larger one, because the flagship brand on Merge, Carbon's payments are done via Merge as well. In theory, you are correct, if the site wish to provide more service by taking on payments themselves, they could possibly provide better service/profits for themselves, but in practice this is not the case and in more cases than not more risky for the player.
2.1 It is not possible with the current volumes for a single skin operator to get better rates that what the network is getting currently as they cannot match volumes, so they may get the same or similar rate (in the best case scenario), but not better. This of course is not the case with a stand alone site like PS or FTP.
2.2. Also in terms of better service, that itself is questionable too, as staffing up to 24hours service is something of a difficulty and if your main liquidity is in the North American markets, then you're not likely to have 24hr customer service.
2.3. In actuality, for a network, it is inherently safer to have the fund with the network so they can do an automatic reconciliation at the end of the month between player funds and as long as the network is growing, it is far more stable financially than the network sites due to the revenue model of just being a platform and passively receiving income. In nearly all cases where there a site collapsed and money was loss, it was because the mismanagement of the firm which dipped into player balances or the principle of the firm became insolvent. (Tusk poker).
The network provides that added layer of protection for the player and the site has no way to dip into player balances and the network has no reason to dip into player balances as they have no marketing expenditures and everything is a fixed cost.
2.4 I'd add also, that the network has been around longer than most of the sites and you can even with a tiny bit of googling find out who runs Merge etc, whereas the same can't be said for many network sites. Also with the current environment, due to the network processing funds rather than the site itself, it adds a further layer of operations to the process by separating play and payment.
And yes, Merge does do Hero's processing for the very reasons above and I do feel it is the best and proper business decision at this point in time.
Cheers,
David