FIND ALL POSTS by qpw.. very funny

I just don't see how you can play given that your a paid shill.

I want to know what you do to make a living in your life?(I already know)

If you did answer I missed it. I didnt pay much attention to this thread recently so my apologies.

Yea going round calling everyone rigtards or Real Deal shills(he lost any remining credibilty with that one the fool) and idiots.

He ask like you ve murdered his family if you criticise Online Poker in any way.

Just to clarify, I don't think it's 100% certain that all kinds of rigging would show up in a simple giant card distribution.

But I do think with the right database you could detect just about anything. My dream database would be like a billion showdowns where all the money goes in with at least one card left to come (so PF, flop, turn). Each row would be a showdown, and the columns would be something like the following:

Buyin
Player 1 cards
Player 2 cards
Player 1 equity
Player 2 equity
Who won the hand
Player 1 location
Player 2 location
Time of day
Day of week
Player 1 # of tables currently playing
Player 2 # of tables currently playing
Player 1 normal average buyin
Player 2 normal average buyin
Player 1 join date
Player 2 join date
Player 1 volume (# of buyins spent) last week, month, 6 months, year
Player 2 volume (# of buyins spent) last week, month, 6 months, year

and certainly some other stuff I haven't thought of yet


I would run a regression analysis of all those fields vs. how close the final equity (who won hand) came to the equity when all the money went in. If any of those fields is weighted to win/lose more than it should, that would show up in the regression analysis. This is the kind of thing that if PS would be required to provide were they say regulated in the US, and someone sued claiming riggedness. I know I used to work for the top statistical consulting firm in the country for handling lawsuits. This is exactly the kind of stuff we dealt with.

Anyone have such a DB they can send me? Also maybe a license to SAS and a Xeon server I could borrow?

Point 1 is hard for those of us who are not complete stat freaks to truly grasp, though most of the very simplistic riggedologist theories presented would certainly be easy to catch.

To their credit, most have adapted and go for the "software will just do secret stuff no one can detect" approach now which is certainly harder to disprove given it's magical nature.

Point 2 is sort of meh. Even if the Isle of Man is ineffective this massive rigging conspiracy, if it existed, has to go undetected. I agree point 2 is sort of minor in comparison.

Point 3 seems strange. Does this require Stars to be outright lying about the type of deal they use? That seems really out there that they would do something so easy to catch. Maybe I am missing something here.

Point 4 is completely tied into point 6. One of the biggest flaws of many riggedology beliefs is that they look at potential gain (often times incorrectly determined) while completely ignoring risk. That is not the way it works except for criminals on the tv show COPS.

Point 5 and 6 are the meat of it. Other then by magic (create the software to magically do it with no one knowing or telling) I just do not see how a large, successful company would go about pulling this off in this area, and so far no riggedologist has offered any insight other then shouting Enron and saying that in this world some people commit crime.

Yes, we all know bad people exist, but in this specific industry how do these companies leap past points 5 and 6 even if you ignore or play along with points 1-4 being flexible.

If you did all of that and demonstrated that everything seemed normal, you know what would happen next?

Someone would come here, post a single hand, declare it is rigged, and the whole cycle would continue.

Welcome to the thread...

For the third time: why?

Where are you going with this line of enquiry?

If I tell you I'm a road sweeper what are you going to make of that?

Or an airline pilot?

Or a paramedic?

Or a career criminal currently in prison for a 20 stretch?

Really, tell us why you want to know and what you plan to do with the information.

Cmon Monteroy this is a clear example of sites protecting the fish.

This is an altered deal.

This isnt poker this is a joke.

Ern, no, actually I made a single deposit.

And a (very large) number of withdrawals.

Unlike yourself who has to keep depositing week in, week out.

Still, chin up!

Ah, so you admit you edited the HH just to support your idiot, rigtard, theories.

This isn't poker it's just you acting the cretin as per.

I want to hear you lie and because I believe that sites are paying people to sit and defend them in Forums like this.

Also congratulations on formulating a post without the term "rigtard" or "idiot". Give yourself a pat on the back.

No I didnt alter the hand wtf are you talking about.

Lots of large withdrawals eh, which site are you on then? Graphs? HHs?

Thats probably a lie...Either way, you guys were saying something about the risk and not wanting to get caught cheating their customers...Who's going to catch them? Who's going to discipline them? Who's going to arrest them? IF they did cheat customers?
We saw how the KGC handled it....

OK, anything to oblige.

I am a shill for on-line poker employed by the Lizard People for their nefarious (look it up) purposes.

Happy?

As far as I can tell, you've only posted 2 hands from FTP, that might not have even been yours, but could just be something you saw and thought "proved" rigging, so I consider you a shill too. Obviously the sites want to cover up the rigging, so they pay people to say things so unbelievably stupid about rigging it convinces people it can't be rigged.
I'd say losing a good amount of your customers is pretty good punishment. I'm not sure how many people played on AP/UB before the scandal broke, but they only have something like 4,500 players a day now.

qpw in a nutshell

You wish.

And you want the US government incolved?

And how did they handle it when the banks f**ked up so monumentally that the whole financial system was about to go into meltdown?

Did they arrest those responsible?

Did ther seize the assets of those who had cause so much misery to untold numbers of good, honest, hard working, Americans?

Did thay fu*k.

They gave the bastids a load of taxpayer's (a.k.a. good, honest, hard working, Americans) money to bail them out.

Pass the sick bag, Alice!

The hands come from page 322 of this thread and are not my hands. I have never played at FTP.

I am 100% certain online poker is rigged, and would literally bet my life on it.

I've posted evidence ITT, and will gather and post some more.

They could do a static deal, but then the black box object (that only a few senior people maintain) does a little special re-deal part under circumstances until it gets what it wants. Again, far-fetched, but that's how it would work. Most of the day-to-day programmers would be unaware of what was going on. If someone trusted would just tell me that the code is not set up this way, I would believe that it's almost impossible PS could be rigged against certain categories of players.


I've seen some argue nothing could be gained period. I was just refuting that. There's something to be gained, it's just almost certainly outweighed by the risks.


I could care less about that. I'm not doing this thought experiment for the rigtards. I'm doing it for my own piece of mind. It's not good for my game to sit there thinking "this cannot possibly happening" for the 7th Saturday night in a row, or 25th 12-table set in a row.

So what the **** are you doing on a forum devoted to on line poker?

Why did you not just cash in whatever they left you and go away and do somethine more profitable.

What a f**king idiot!

Just to keep Darwin true it would be good if someone took you up on your moronic bet!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dnyGYkij-W4

lol you and Monteroy aren't the only ones using the funny "Lizard people" defence. You need a new line lol.

Here s a shill for the Guardian newspaper using the same tactic.

1. Believe it or not, the poker strategies discussed here apply to live play as well. Do I really need to explain that?

2. I often post and read forums here not related to poker anyway.

3. I still play low stakes online for practice, since I don't live near a card room.

I think it's possible to profit in online poker, provided you adjust to the skewed probability distributions of the rigged rng. I hypothesize many of the winning online players do that automatically from playing so many hands.

Yeah , hard to argue that that can ever happen. Guess this proves live poker on TV is rigged (that dealer did look shifty).

Oh wait I can do youtube videos also!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOLw2q0JG9Y

Sorry, it's AK vs A7 not AK vs A8, closest I could find on short notice... Oh yeah, mine also does not have a backdoor flush draw possible so I guess live poker extra rigged compared to online.

Seriously, your weird qpw obsession combined with your inability to beat low/mid stakes poker has really had a strange impact on you.

Not that I actually care, just saying.

If this is just your way to vent steam after correctly giving up on poker then all the power to you. Carry on.

All the best.

Do you mind linking to your "proof" ITT? I can't find it. Thanks.

Thanks for proving my point, shill.