Quote:
Originally Posted by Jspirit88
In theory if Hamilton and his crew kept their winnings reasonable they would have gone undetectable.
Um, yeah, another way in which a super user is totally different than RNG rigging. Thanks for pointing that out.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jspirit88
The victims knew something was wrong, do you call them riggedologists or rigtards? no, because their intuition was spot on. Which proves a healthy dose of skepticism is the only way to go.
Sigh. Maybe those of you that join this "debate" late don't understand the difference.
There are people that start threads telling us how rigged online poker is because of what they observed. They of course have no data to back this up, for a whole variety of reasons. But they "know" it's rigged. These are the people that are called names like rigtard and are met with great derision.
Then you have people like those that that first broke the AP/UB scandal. They came with actual hand histories, and verifiable data. While there were a few sceptics (there always will be in any Internet forum), the claims were looked into by others and the investigation quickly snowballed.