Unless it was rigged in your favour because you are so, so bad.

Why do you bother posting these stats when you have said repeatedly that you have no intention of providing anything other than the most general details and won't back up your claim or let anyone verify that you've done your calculations correctly or even indicate how far off of expectation you think your results are? What kind of reaction do you expect?

Oh that is easy. Play top 5 hands. Suck up to Collin Moshman and bumhunt. Then pray you can get a bunch of fish to pay you to coach them.

All the while thinking. I am the greatest!

Wasn't bop the guy whining about his O8 beats?

I don't know. He's certainly the guy with a creepy man crush on Monteroy.

What do you mean with calculations made correctly? Every poker odds calculator on web gives you the odds and if you can count outs you can even do yourself but starting hands odds in allin situations are clear after the hand is played.
Well i dont care of the reactions. I had to tell what things i experienced at Pokerstars. Some idiots who just are able to offend but not to argue i will even not respond.

Promise?

How does one check for a site's fairness with a poker odds calculator?

He and little ray are similar in that regard. Does not matter much - stalkers gonna stalk and weirdos gonna weird.

Only issue at times is they carry on conversations that ended weeks, months or years ago as if they happened at the time they post. Fortunately the internet has search functions for those of us who forget the other party pretty much later the same day.


Edit to add: Why hasn't that "sites are rigged to screw every player in coin flips" theory been fleshed out more. That had some genuine comedy potential, especially since the concept of more than 1 person in a poker hand has been explained to "D" boy which ended his latest butchery of simple math.

Yeah, but although Ray has a "special" relationship with you, he does at least interact with everybody else in the thread and is just generally a bit of a character. BOP just pops into the thread, throws abuse at you and then disappears, usually after some reference to Colin Moshman.

He's obsessed

Hello everyone,

first of all, I am not just another mediocre player complaining about a bad beat or a bad run. Here is my situation: I played heads up SNG at Fulltilt at the $50-$100 buy in level with a double digit average ROI over a few thousand games. After FT got cancelled, I switched to Pokerstars where I already held an account from before. In the first 500 games or so I barely made any profit, mostly due to a $700 downswing following my first withdrawal, even though the players are not any better than at Fulltilt. I created a new account and immediately went on a 7 games winning streak. About 700 games at the $60 buy-in later I held a solid 14% ROI while making continuous small withdrawals of $100-$300. About two weeks ago I made my last and largest $800 withdrawal. Since that day PRECISELY I have been on my biggest ever downswing of $1300, with a series of bad beats, missed flops and awful hands.

What I would like to know if anyone has had an similarly objectively suspicious experience following a Pokerstars withdrawal?

Take care and run well.

Niko

No, I'm not an MAing scumbag.

Search his posts. Dude's obsessed with all sorts of poker people.

The poker odds calculator will tell you basic poker odds: how you are calculating whether your results are far off expectation is another manner entirely.

There's nothing to argue about with you- you haven't given enough detail to draw any conclusions at all!

Yes, most definitely. And now worst of all, you will be marked as a good player and a net withdrawer. This will be difficult if not impossible to overcome.

EVERYBODY has experienced this. Only problem, honesty and ignorance get in they way of telling it the way it is. And trying to get a real answer in this thread which is populated 24/7 with 90% site promoters and affiliates, well, good luck with that.
This doesnt just happen at pokerstars. It happens at every online poker site, as the software is programmed to get profits back at one time or another. This creates rebuy after rebuy which is the main purpose of their being in business.

Life is rigged. I guess we can call this the luck factor. It is kind of like some people win the lottery multiple times. Others are on the other end who get struck by lightning multiple times. I guess they get lucky cause they live or unlucky in that they get struck by lightning and live. Poker is no different you have the lucky and the unlucky. Nothing is by chance.

Hey, do 10% of players end up with all the money after 10,000 hands in a fair game or not? You pretty clearly posted a video you endorsed that said that, so I just wanted to know.

sigh

Thanks for your reply. Why is is then that there are many players at Pokerstars who are earning $100,000+ yearly? Is it because they pay so much rake anyway? Any ideas on how to get pass this initial phase without starting a new account?

I thought it was the fact that 10% of the players would wipe out the other 90% within 10,000 hands that meant weak players needed help. I didn't realise withdrawals also factored in, that was not in you bull**** youtube video.

Oh no we have moved from being racist (since you couldn't produce any threads supporting your baseless claim) to now obsession?

You would be better off with the racebaiting. Makes you sound so cool. Even if you are completely clueless.

I don't, thank you.

Everybody?

Really?

Certainly something that is true of your posts.

You need different - and mutually incompatible - riggie theories to explain different groups of players.