The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition - Page 1740 - Internet Poker

Listen up Arouet, basically this is what I was talking about. Attack if you must, but this is 100% accurate. Much more to it then this, but this will give you a general idea involving the some of the deal manipulation.

It's a hypothesis with no backing - how would I be convinced of it, even if I wanted to?

Quote

12-18-2011 , 02:42 AM

#43477

blatantlyrigged

banned

Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 2,603

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arouet

Post my argument for what? Why posting times don't necessarily lead to the conclusion of site promoting? I've already done it.

It's a hypothesis with no backing - how would I be convinced of it, even if I wanted to?

Quote

12-18-2011 , 02:50 AM

#43478

yourewrong

banned

Join Date: Nov 2011 Posts: 204

Quote:

Originally Posted by Octavian30

It's about time someone in authority actually investigated the biased and crooked software that is ripping off players world wide.
it is clearly designed to favour certain players by increasing their percentages to hit and decreasing the percentages.
The percentage is in the 10-15% range but due to the large number hands people play online and the fact that it is really only clearly visible in pre-flop all in situations it is not immediately obvious to the normal observer.
Over large numbers of hands however some players clearly have an EV percentage consistently well in excess of the probabilities while others are consistently below EV - Over 1000s of hands this small but consistent edge generally in favour of the weaker player gives Pokerstars a massive boost to it's per player profit ratio over the long term.

i feel bad for anyone who doesn't believe this.

blatantlyrigged, keep up the good fight. those morons are hanging out in the rigged thread arguing against it. smells fishy to me. i wouldn't be wasting the time that they do just to argue against something that sounds so ridiculous to them.

SCS....EVIDENCE!!! clown

Quote

12-18-2011 , 03:04 AM

#43479

blatantlyrigged

banned

Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 2,603

We wont be hearing from the affiliates, employees, promoters,etc. for a few hours. Not until they start their normal office hours......................ON A SUNDAY LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL

Quote

12-18-2011 , 03:40 AM

#43480

SCS

adept

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 785

Quote:

Originally Posted by blatantlyrigged

And you call me stupid. You are, to quote the great Ian Anderson, as thick as a brick. Right sheep boy?

Wow, you really are stupid.

Quote

12-18-2011 , 04:17 AM

#43481

blatantlyrigged

banned

Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 2,603

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCS

Wow, you really are stupid.

When are they going to be pulling your plug? Im sure the state as declared you brain dead by now.

Quote

12-18-2011 , 04:27 AM

#43482

cashmoneytoday

enthusiast

Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 53

this is hilarious!

Quote

12-18-2011 , 04:39 AM

#43483

Bingo_Boy

old hand

Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 1,872

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sebastes

STEP UP CANADA AND UK
PROTECT YOUR PEOPLE FROM POKERSTARS!!!!!!
OUTRIGHT BAN WOULD BE GREAT.
Then of course take over the market and keep that cash cow local.

With all the info that has come out over the years..

WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE THAT DEFEND THESE CRIMINAL PONZI /MONEY LAUNDERING SCHEMES? AND WHY?

DOWN WITH POKERSTARS 2012
RON PAUL 2012
Send Monteroy To Iran 2012

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sebastes

I know they wont come true M but im an idealist afterall.

If the games are fair why arent you playing the cash games on stars? my god there is so much action happening.
Havnt seen you at a table there in 2 years.

You know exactly who i am and that i can play circles around you in any game.

OH right i dont play double ups..you keep reaching for average pal.

Im Sure POKERSTARS must kick back a LOT of $$$$ under the table to Governments like mine. How Else could they possibly be allowed To CHEAT us and get away with it.

It's rigged! Ban them! Arrest them! (PS: anybody fancy a game)

Quote:

Originally Posted by blatantlyrigged

So if it is 100% accurate which should delve into it further. When we do it will be fundamentally illogical and even more importantly it will directly contradict the theories of the person claiming it is 100% accurate, making you both look stupid

Quote

12-18-2011 , 04:46 AM

#43484

Wiki

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 5,939

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arouet

That's kind of like saying a hand can either win or lose so its 50-50 right?

With insights like that we are clearly dealing with some kind of poker god and should probably leave the thread.

Quote

12-18-2011 , 04:55 AM

#43485

blatantlyrigged

banned

Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 2,603

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bingo_Boy

ILMAO. Affiliate, affiliate, so pissed off at the truth he uses the wrong words and misspells others while in a fit of anger!!!!!!
Such at dork.

Quote

12-18-2011 , 05:07 AM

#43486

raymears

self-banned

Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 976

Lol, you can almost see the red face on him.

Quote

12-18-2011 , 05:13 AM

#43487

blatantlyrigged

banned

Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 2,603

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wiki

With insights like that we are clearly dealing with some kind of poker god and should probably leave the thread.

Please Please

Quote:

Originally Posted by raymears

Lol, you can almost see the red face on him.

lol

Quote

12-18-2011 , 05:15 AM

#43488

Wiki

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 5,939

Quote:

Originally Posted by blatantlyrigged

ILMAO. Affiliate, affiliate, so pissed off at the truth he uses the wrong words and misspells others while in a fit of anger!!!!!! Such at dork.

There are no misspelled words in the section you quoted. Neither did he use any 'wrong' words. You, on the other hand have made multiple errors; repeated word, incorrect word, faulty punctuation.

In the post you quoted there is simply an orphaned 'which' - presumably left over from a deleted clause.

A very minor error in a post. Welcome to the internet.

Quote

12-18-2011 , 05:16 AM

#43489

Wiki

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 5,939

Quote:

Originally Posted by blatantlyrigged

Please Please

Are you having trouble remembering the title to an old Beatles song?

Clue: The next word begins with 'M'.

Quote

12-18-2011 , 05:18 AM

#43490

blatantlyrigged

banned

Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 2,603

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wiki

Hate to even respond here, but you are one pathetic individual.

Quote

12-18-2011 , 05:19 AM

#43491

Wiki

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 5,939

Quote:

Originally Posted by Octavian30

It's about time someone in authority actually investigated the biased and crooked software that is ripping off players world wide.

No need to involve 'someone in authority'.

Simply post your evidence and, if it is credible, the resulting fire storm will result in the company concerned losing a very large proportion of its player base and hamper any attempts it may make to rebuild it.

Quote

12-18-2011 , 05:20 AM

#43492

Wiki

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 5,939

Quote:

Originally Posted by blatantlyrigged

Got nothing to even respond with here ...

FYP.

Quote

12-18-2011 , 05:40 AM

#43493

raymears

self-banned

Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 976

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wiki

In the post you quoted there is simply an orphaned 'which' - presumably left over from a deleted clause.

To be fair, the erroneous use of the word 'which', which, as we can see, the author typed in place of the obviously intended 'we', is a mistake which we (as upholders of all that is just) should not overlook.

Quote

12-18-2011 , 05:46 AM

#43494

Wiki

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 5,939

Quote:

Originally Posted by raymears

OK, -1 internetz to whomever made the mistake.

Quote

12-18-2011 , 05:47 AM

#43495

Bingo_Boy

old hand

Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 1,872

Quote:

Originally Posted by raymears

Lol, you can almost see the red face on him.

Surely there are plenty of red faced men in your collection that you could post for comedy value. Go on, you know you want to.

Quote

12-18-2011 , 05:52 AM

#43496

raymears

self-banned

Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 976

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wiki

OK, -1 internetz to whomever made the mistake.

I wouldn't dream of issuing a demerit for such a wee faux pas.

Quote

12-18-2011 , 05:55 AM

#43497

Wiki

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 5,939

Quote:

Originally Posted by raymears

I wouldn't dream of issuing a demerit for such a wee faux pas.

You're all heart.

Unfortunately I could not be so forgiving for fear that I would have my membership of the Grammar Nazis revoked.

Quote

12-18-2011 , 06:13 AM

#43498

raymears

self-banned

Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 976

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bingo_Boy

Surely there are plenty of red faced men in your collection that you could post for comedy value. Go on, you know you want to.

I can hardly contain myself.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wiki

Unfortunately I could not be so forgiving for fear that I would have my membership of the Grammar Nazis revoked.

I believe your talking about 'grammer'.

Quote

12-18-2011 , 06:15 AM

#43499

Wiki

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 5,939

Quote:

Originally Posted by raymears

I believe your talking about 'grammer'.

Loved his 'Frasier'.

Quote

12-18-2011 , 06:17 AM

#43500

J9Suited

adept

Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 1,156

I've checked the rota. My turn to post last.

(The "must be a shill cos they post last" theory did have me laughing out loud).

Quote

Page 1740 of 3721

First

740 1240 1540 1640 1690 1720 1730 1735 1736 1737 1738 1739 1740 1741 1742 1743 1744 1745 1750 1760 1790 1840 1940 2240 2740

Last

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 1740 of 3721

First

740 1240 1540 1640 1690 1720 1730 1735 1736 1737 1738 1739 1740 1741 1742 1743 1744 1745 1750 1760 1790 1840 1940 2240 2740

Last