Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > Internet Poker > Internet Poker

Notices

Internet Poker Discussions of Internet poker venues.

View Poll Results: Is Online Poker Rigged?
Yes 2,162 35.67%
No 3,620 59.73%
Undecided 279 4.60%
Voters: 6061. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-24-2010, 11:49 AM   #14746
enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: seattle
Posts: 71
Re: Something to waste my time, prove nothing, and generally invite the "pro" trolls...

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrrpb View Post
First you'll have to get signed by Trollrunners.com, LeggoTrolls.com or TrollsCracked.com

Or perhaps win a large trollament and get signed by Full Tilt Trolling.
Its best if you get in with trollbackpros. You might as well get a return. Bing, theres my 1st payment.
buffulojt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 11:49 AM   #14747
Actually Shows Proof
 
spadebidder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: This looks interesting.
Posts: 7,897
Re: The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by cjhmdm View Post
not to mention you can check whois infor for cjhmdm.com and see the domain is older than yesterday... then send me an email at chris (at) domain in previous sentence.

If that isn't enough to convince you I am me, and no one else.. sorry.
Good enough. Can we go back to your claim that no RNG is random? If you are claiming that other outcomes are substituted for the RNG random outcomes, that's fine. But that isn't what you said. So I asked you to define random, in an attempt to understand your claim.
spadebidder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 11:56 AM   #14748
veteran
 
tk1133's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Making friends one post @ a time
Posts: 2,221
Cool Re: The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by spadebidder View Post
Good enough. Can we go back to your claim that no RNG is random? If you are claiming that other outcomes are substituted for the RNG random outcomes, that's fine. But that isn't what you said. So I asked you to define random, in an attempt to understand your claim.
Own him CJ...
tk1133 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 11:59 AM   #14749
journeyman
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 229
Re: The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by spadebidder View Post
Good enough. Can we go back to your claim that no RNG is random? If you are claiming that other outcomes are substituted for the RNG random outcomes, that's fine. But that isn't what you said. So I asked you to define random, in an attempt to understand your claim.
At this stage I haven't claimed anything. I simply stated what I believe. I also stated that I would provide my oen data to help either support, or disprove, my beliefs. I also stated that I would most likely prove that I can spend money on this hobby that I love, without having to worry about being cheated in the long run.

Anything outside of that is me arguing one side of a debate that I currently believe. I cannot say one way or another that any site is in fact "rigged", regardless of what I personally believe. And when I go over the stats of data that I've personally collected, and at least prove to myself that my beliefs are wrong, then I will admit this.

Edit: apologies... yes, I have claimed no rng is truly random.. and I will stick by that. Unfortunately the "proof" that I can offer to support said claim will have to be taken as my word. And we tread a fine line here because I have nothing to prove to anyone, and am merely arguing for one side of a debate, but if I need to post my resume then I will.


The only "true random" that I personally, and professionally, believe in is in the form of the following:
Have 1 million people stand in a line. Tell person #1 something and have him/her whisper it to the next person, so on and so forth. Then ask the last person in line what was said... this is random... simply because it took a million people to alter the original output. And with no coaching, you can genuinely expect a random response. This will prove true 100% of the time.

Anything above that has a level of failure simply because the interpretation between man and machine is altered by what man thinks machine should have said...

Of course, this is a primitive example, but the general idea still applies.

Last edited by cjhmdm; 02-24-2010 at 12:09 PM.
cjhmdm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 12:05 PM   #14750
Pooh-Bah
 
5thStreetHog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,682
Re: The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by spadebidder View Post
Good enough. Can we go back to your claim that no RNG is random? If you are claiming that other outcomes are substituted for the RNG random outcomes, that's fine. But that isn't what you said. So I asked you to define random, in an attempt to understand your claim.
.
5thStreetHog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 12:10 PM   #14751
journeyman
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 229
Re: The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5thStreetHog View Post
.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjhmdm View Post
Edit: apologies... yes, I have claimed no rng is truly random.. and I will stick by that. Unfortunately the "proof" that I can offer to support said claim will have to be taken as my word. And we tread a fine line here because I have nothing to prove to anyone, and am merely arguing for one side of a debate, but if I need to post my resume then I will.


The only "true random" that I personally, and professionally, believe in is in the form of the following:
Have 1 million people stand in a line. Tell person #1 something and have him/her whisper it to the next person, so on and so forth. Then ask the last person in line what was said... this is random... simply because it took a million people to alter the original output. And with no coaching, you can genuinely expect a random response. This will prove true 100% of the time.

Anything above that has a level of failure simply because the interpretation between man and machine is altered by what man thinks machine should have said...

Of course, this is a primitive example, but the general idea still applies.
Sorry, I chose editing above reposting...
cjhmdm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 12:12 PM   #14752
Pooh-Bah
 
sirswish6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,900
Re: The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition

even if the rng is not completely random, doesnt that mean its not completely random for everyone? how is anyone at a disadvantage and how do poker sites profit from it not being random?
sirswish6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 12:22 PM   #14753
banned
 
RagzToRiches's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: u spite me u win. I spite u u win
Posts: 3,962
Re: The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition

RIGGED TO SHYT SIMPLE AS. SOOOOOO RIGGED IT AINT EVEN POSSIBLE
RagzToRiches is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 12:25 PM   #14754
qpw
banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pulling the tails of rigtards
Posts: 4,021
Re: The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by RagzToRiches View Post
RIGGED TO SHYT SIMPLE AS. SOOOOOO RIGGED IT AINT EVEN POSSIBLE
Do tell us your story.
qpw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 12:35 PM   #14755
journeyman
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 229
Re: The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by sirswish6 View Post
even if the rng is not completely random, doesnt that mean its not completely random for everyone? how is anyone at a disadvantage and how do poker sites profit from it not being random?
To expand further...

Let's assume the poker rooms have hardware rng.
Now, let' not assume that the output from said hardware rng is then sent through software. To say it is not would invalidate anything you say since we're all playing through software.

now, let's assume that the output from hardware isn't what the software wants it to be, for whatever reason.

Let's assume the software collects x amount of info from each table, and x amount of info from each player at each table.

let's assume that the software can determine that player b is more likely to deposit more money after losing his/her bankroll than player c is. Player B is a tight player who doesn't really advance or decline one way or another.

So let's assume that the software is cheating in order to gain more money per deposit.

If all of the above is true, then it doesn't matter what the hardware originally spits out.

The reason for this is because the software is designed to know that so long as player b wins x amount of hands, but ultimately loses more than he wins, he will make another deposit.

Assuming all of the above is the case, player b will ultimately lose more when the odds are in his favor, because the software knows he will simply deposit more money anyway.

now, of course there are other factors in place, such as those starting with nothing and making it big. Sure.. this can happen, and happen a lot, for 2 reasons. First, it would assist in removing any suspicion that said poker software is cheating. Secondly, it would give those who are habitual depositors hope that one day they can "make it big", with the end result that they keep chasing the dream and depositing money.

Now, the above is one hell of a scenario, but when you're talking millions of players and billions of dollars in play a day, it is not something that can be ignored without true data. The problem with this is, how do we know the data we are being shown is true? As is with any other money scam, we will be shown what the company/person/entity wants us to see. So we are ultimately left with either believing or disbelieving what other people on the internet tells/shows us.

And please.. let's not bring the "auditors" into the above scenario... Because all it would take to pass an "audit" is a few changes to a few variables in the code of the software...


Just because the claim of "hardware rng" is there, doen't mean it cannot be altered after passing a ton of other data through the software.

And again... yes, we're talking extremes... but look at what we're really talking about... online gambling. Gambling itself carries a great level of risk.. now let's take the face to face level of risk gamblings brings.. then let's pass it through some software that serves more players than any live table would, and can determine more about each player than any live table ever could... And "decisions" of what cards to deal to whom at what time can be made simply based on data from each player.

Last edited by cjhmdm; 02-24-2010 at 12:43 PM.
cjhmdm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 12:38 PM   #14756
Actually Shows Proof
 
spadebidder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: This looks interesting.
Posts: 7,897
Re: The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by cjhmdm View Post
The only "true random" that I personally, and professionally, believe in is in the form of the following:
Have 1 million people stand in a line. Tell person #1 something and have him/her whisper it to the next person, so on and so forth. Then ask the last person in line what was said... this is random... simply because it took a million people to alter the original output. And with no coaching, you can genuinely expect a random response. This will prove true 100% of the time.
Well that's a novel interpretation. I probably won't have much else of value to offer you in the way of debate, because I can't compete with that.
spadebidder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 12:39 PM   #14757
qpw
banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pulling the tails of rigtards
Posts: 4,021
Re: The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition

Sorry, cjhmdm

Can I just confirm that you are snakes's new gimmick?

Thanks.
qpw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 12:40 PM   #14758
qpw
banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pulling the tails of rigtards
Posts: 4,021
Re: The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by cjhmdm View Post
The only "true random" that I personally, and professionally, believe in is in the form of the following:
Have 1 million people stand in a line. Tell person #1 something and have him/her whisper it to the next person, so on and so forth. Then ask the last person in line what was said... this is random... simply because it took a million people to alter the original output. And with no coaching, you can genuinely expect a random response. This will prove true 100% of the time.
You do realise that you are certifiably insane?
qpw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 12:45 PM   #14759
journeyman
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 229
Re: The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by qpw View Post
Sorry, cjhmdm

Can I just confirm that you are snakes's new gimmick?

Thanks.
http://www.who.is/whois/cjhmdm.com/
send me an email at chris (at) the above domain.. I've said this already....
cjhmdm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 12:46 PM   #14760
journeyman
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 229
Re: The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by qpw View Post
You do realise that you are certifiably insane?
Do you have a doctorate, or even a PHD in psychology?
cjhmdm is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive