The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition - Page 3329 - Internet Poker

mikejfi · 02-29-2012, 07:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bobo Fett

Wow, you are really something else. Not here to blame? Oh, no, not at all.

So let me get this straight. You prove time and again that you're terrible at anything "technical" like posting links and quoting posts - proven yet again by you cutting-and-pasting that post rather than linking it, so I had to spend 10 minutes finding the post myself (it took me this long because when you do post here, it's nothing for you to fire off 10 or 20 posts in a day - lol @ you calling out others for posting too much). Yet in spite of this, when the link you posted doesn't work, the first conclusion you jump to is that I ruined your link. Well, here's the post I edited; I used the quote function as you should have:

Hey, guess what? The link works! And if you think this is some kind of trickery, go ahead and click on the little arrow next to your name on that quote; it will take you directly to your post, where you can see when I last edited it (the same day you posted it) and try the link there as well.

The problem is, this site, like many others, shortens the URL you see in the post. When you cut-and-paste it, rather than quoting it, you break the link.

So to sum up, you post links that don't work. I go in and fix them for you. And for this, the thanks I get is that you come back a couple of weeks later and **** them up by cut-and-pasting them and then try to blame me for your incompetence. You do so in three separate posts, and then say you're not here to blame me.

I very rarely stoop to insults in the forums, but you've really tried my patience this time - you're acting like a huge ****ing idiot.

Bobo, could this be considered circumventing the profanity filter. To me it leaves no doubt what word you blacked out.

and to think I received an infraction for it,

who infracts you?

tompakee · 02-29-2012, 07:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikejfi

Bobo, could this be considered circumventing the profanity filter. To me it leaves no doubt what word you blacked out.

and to think I received an infraction for it,

who infracts you?

You only get an infraction when you deserve it. Oh and funny how BR disappears and this fool pops up 5 minutes later. Would love to see 2+2 do an ip check on these accounts and wipe out all of the gimmick ones that have been made. Be interesting to see how many would be gone overnight

tompakee · 02-29-2012, 07:34 AM

Quote:

I very rarely stoop to insults in the forums, but you've really tried my patience this time - you're acting like a huge ****ing idiot.

Quote:

To me it leaves no doubt what word you blacked out.

donking, sucking, moaning? the list is long

mikejfi · 02-29-2012, 07:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by otatop

It's funny that they assume that since they're too dumb to figure out multi-quoting, everyone is. I'm sure if one of them wanted to reply to more than 1 post at a time, it's a 15 minute ordeal as they hit quote, post a reply, then find whatever other posts they want to reply to over and over.

I will agree with this, since most of us riggies dont spend 24/7 like you 1-3 regular shills masquerading as 5-10 shills.

You all ( or a few, I'm guessing multiaccounts) seem very adept at the multiquoting , posting pics, etc.

but why wouldn't you be , as most of you including Wiki( multiaccount?) obviously spend your entire day here ever day week after week.

By thaqt I could see how you would have so much more experience posting in this forum

Wiki · 02-29-2012, 07:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikejfi

Bobo, could this be considered circumventing the profanity filter. To me it leaves no doubt what word you blacked out.

and to think I received an infraction for it,

who infracts you?

You really are a giant ****, aren't you?

The correct way to post 'bad' words is to just type them normally. Then the profanity filter will do what 2+2's management has decided to do in each case.

Guess what that is?

Yup, it puts asterisks in place of what it deems unacceptable.

So Bobo behaved correctly; it's just you who's being a ****ing prick.

mikejfi · 02-29-2012, 07:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tompakee

donking, sucking, moaning? the list is long

Just like a typical shill to ignore the obvious.

When the list is short let's make it long.

ROFL , the norm for you shills

Wiki · 02-29-2012, 07:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikejfi

You all ( or a few, I'm guessing multiaccounts) seem very adept at the multiquoting , posting pics, etc.

Why wouldn't we be?

It's so simple that anyone who is not a drooling moron can get it right in one post (clue: use the preview button).

I wonder why you can't manage it.

Oh, wait ...

Wiki · 02-29-2012, 07:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikejfi

Just like a typical shill to ignore the obvious.

When the list is short let's make it long.

ROFL , the norm for you shills

Perhaps he was trying to spare your feelings.

You being such a ****ing ****.

mikejfi · 02-29-2012, 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tompakee

You only get an infraction when you deserve it. Oh and funny how BR disappears and this fool pops up 5 minutes later. Would love to see 2+2 do an ip check on these accounts and wipe out all of the gimmick ones that have been made. Be interesting to see how many would be gone overnight

The same applies to you shills, that could explain the one sided results of this poll

Surprised you didn't multiaccount more than you did to make the poll results even more lopsided.

Wiki · 02-29-2012, 07:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikejfi

The same applies to you shills, that could explain the one sided results of this poll

How can a poll where the minority gets more than one third of the votes be considered 'one sided'?

You rigtards use an Orwellian Newspeak where 'one sided' means 'with a result with which we do not agree' and 'shill' means 'someone who does not agree with me'.

mikejfi · 02-29-2012, 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wiki

Why wouldn't we be?

It's so simple that anyone who is not a drooling moron can get it right in one post (clue: use the preview button).

I wonder why you can't manage it.

Oh, wait ...

oh wait... 2 minutes between posts to respond.

Let me guess you have time at your "other job, ROFL," to respond so quickly.

oh wait... this is your only job

****ing moron oops

Wiki · 02-29-2012, 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikejfi

oh wait... 2 minutes between posts to respond.

Let me guess you have time at your "other job, ROFL," to respond so quickly.

It takes about 30 seconds to respond to one of your cretinous posts. I have a lot of thirty second windows in my working day.

mikejfi · 02-29-2012, 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wiki

How can a poll where the minority gets more than one third of the votes be considered 'one sided'?

You rigtards use an Orwellian Newspeak where 'one sided' means 'with a result with which we do not agree' and 'shill' means 'someone who does not agree with me'.

put it this way shilltard,

if the poll results were an election result

it would be a landslide

but your too ****ing stupid to figure that out by yourself

So I will help you dumb ass

mikejfi · 02-29-2012, 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wiki

It takes about 30 seconds to respond to one of your cretinous posts. I have a lot of thirty second windows in my working day.

Like this forum isn't your work day

teehee

Darkus63 · 02-29-2012, 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikejfi

Bobo, could this be considered circumventing the profanity filter. To me it leaves no doubt what word you blacked out.

and to think I received an infraction for it,

who infracts you?

Nice to see that you have as little idea of how the profanity filter works as you do about playing poker. I never type profanities but I'm going to make an exception here. You are a ****ing dickhead.