The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition

[SooperFish24]

Originally Posted by qpw

Let's divide the (poker playing) world into three groups:

1) Those who think OLP is rigged and don't play and presumably don't come here.
2) Those who are pretty sure it's not rigged and understand the arguments for why that is the case.
3) Those who, despite having no evidence whatsoever, believe that it is rigged and who, further, are so animal stupid that they keep playing in between coming here to whine about it.

Which of those groups probably think I and anyone else who proposes logical arguments why OLP is probably not rigged are shills?

Well, group #3, of course.

Do you seriously think we give a tinker's cuss what the retards in that group think?

Insults again qpw, anyone who flings insults around like that loses more CREDIBILITY.

You reply very quickly qpw like your getting paid t sit around the forum debunking folk who think its rigged.

Also you only seem to post in the Internet Gambling forum which is a little curious. Like this is your forum for shilling.

Lots of posters think it isnt rigged but only you seem to be straight into every rigged thread on the other side of the fence. Almost every time I open Internet Poker and there s a rigged thread or the like the last poster is "qpw" surprise surprise.

Seriously get a new account so its harder to spot you.

You never PM d me the shill application form I could use the cash.

p.s. lol at your 3 little groups.

[spadebidder]

Originally Posted by qpw

And you can, indeed, start a paragraph with a conjunction if you know what you are doing.

The 'rule' was something designed to help school children who would mistakenly start new sentences in inappropriate places.

lol @ rigtards = school children

[Monteroy]

Originally Posted by SooperFish24

Insults again qpw, anyone who flings insults around like that loses more CREDIBILITY.

To a small extent, but not nearly to the extent that you expect. A reaction of "why bother with that rigtard anymore you made your point" would be a bit more accurate. His arguments lose potency after the 100th iteration, not so much credibility.

Originally Posted by SooperFish24

You reply very quickly qpw like your getting paid t sit around the forum debunking folk who think its rigged.

You are taking an observation (his posting behavior) and applying an assumption to it (he must be a shill), and that is a very flawed form of reasoning.

Take the simpler approach - he replies all the time and fast on the message boards because he is a message board junkie.

All you do when you make up stuff (like the shill comments) is validate that you are willing to happily make stuff up. Believe it or not, people who make stuff up tend to genuinely lack credibility

Originally Posted by SooperFish24

Also you only seem to post in the Internet Gambling forum which is a little curious. Like this is your forum for shilling.

Or he just finds the topics here more to his interest then the Laughs or Links! forum

Originally Posted by SooperFish24

Lots of posters think it isnt rigged but only you seem to be straight into every rigged thread on the other side of the fence. Almost every time I open Internet Poker and there s a rigged thread or the like the last poster is "qpw" surprise surprise.

Person A goes to the washroom. Person B goes to the washroom and sees Person A. This happens 3 days in a row and Person A says "dude, why are you always in the washroom" implying that something is wrong with Person B.

Yet the world looks the exact same from Person B's perspective about Person A.

All you do is jump into any thread with rigged in it and blindly support any poster that posts anything about it being rigged, even if it is a new poster saying their second cousin heard from a friend that someone is going to expose the industry.

Put simply, you behave in the exact same way as how you describe qpw's behavior. You just have a "not" in front of your opinion vs his. Extremist behavior tends to be similar regardless of the sides they are on about an issue.

Originally Posted by SooperFish24

You never PM d me the shill application form I could use the cash.

Most rigtards tend to be losing players (that the sites seem to not help with their rigging somehow) so it is believable that you are indeed in a state of poverty. You may find your credibility improve if you mak more statements of truth like that and fewer ones based on assumptions in the future.

Hope this helped.

All the best.

[qpw]

Originally Posted by Monteroy

His arguments lose potency after the 100th iteration, not so much credibility.

And he starts wondering why he bothers.

Take the simpler approach - he replies all the time and fast on the message boards because he is a message board junkie.

An intermittent board junkie.

When doing certain tasks that involve sitting in front of the computer and waiting for it do churn through an analysis.

I know I shouldn't but tweaking the tails of rigtards is just so damn amusing.

[Cry Me A River]

Originally Posted by SooperFish24

Insults again qpw, anyone who flings insults around like that loses more CREDIBILITY.

You reply very quickly qpw like your getting paid t sit around the forum debunking folk who think its rigged.

Also you only seem to post in the Internet Gambling forum which is a little curious. Like this is your forum for shilling.

Lots of posters think it isnt rigged but only you seem to be straight into every rigged thread on the other side of the fence. Almost every time I open Internet Poker and there s a rigged thread or the like the last poster is "qpw" surprise surprise.

Seriously get a new account so its harder to spot you.

You never PM d me the shill application form I could use the cash.

p.s. lol at your 3 little groups.

Which casino do you work for? How much do they pay you to say online poker is rigged?

Do you work for Harrah's? Or Foxwoods? Or the Borgatta?

You reply very quickly SooperFish24 like your getting paid t sit around the forum promoting that online poker is rigged.

Also you only seem to post in the Internet Gambling forum which is a little curious. Like this is your forum for shilling.

Lots of posters think it's rigged but only you seem to be straight into every rigged thread on the other side of the fence. Almost every time I open Internet Poker and there s a rigged thread or the like the last poster is "SooperFish24" surprise surprise.

Seriously get a new account so its harder to spot you.

[SooperFish24]

Originally Posted by Cry Me A River

Which casino do you work for? How much do they pay you to say online poker is rigged?

Do you work for Harrah's? Or Foxwoods? Or the Borgatta?

You reply very quickly SooperFish24 like your getting paid t sit around the forum promoting that online poker is rigged.

Also you only seem to post in the Internet Gambling forum which is a little curious. Like this is your forum for shilling.

Lots of posters think it's rigged but only you seem to be straight into every rigged thread on the other side of the fence. Almost every time I open Internet Poker and there s a rigged thread or the like the last poster is "SooperFish24" surprise surprise.

Seriously get a new account so its harder to spot you.

Epic Fail!

You reply very quickly SooperFish24 like your getting paid t sit around the forum promoting that online poker is rigged.

LOL no I dont.

Also you only seem to post in the Internet Gambling forum which is a little curious. Like this is your forum for shilling.

LOl no I dont.

I dont know why Im bothering replying to this nonsense. Ive seen this kind of response before where my OP is just turned around in a laughable way. Like a child in an argument repeating what the other has said in a mocking condesending tone because they have no real comeback.

What are you 5 years old?

[Wiki]

Originally Posted by SooperFish24

Epic Fail!

LOL no I dont.

LOl no I dont.

I dont know why Im bothering replying to this nonsense. Ive seen this kind of response before where my OP is just turned around in a laughable way. Like a child in an argument repeating what the other has said in a mocking condesending tone because they have no real comeback.

What are you 5 years old?

Sooperfish, if you were even slightly intelligent you would see that Cry Me A River, far from producing an epic fail, has produced a hilarious satire on the lumpen, childish, styles of yourself and th1133.

You two are making complete fools of yourselves on these threads.

Markusg and qpw could be faulted for being overzealous but other than that they are spot on.

Why do you keep embarrassing yourselves like this?

[DMoogle]

Some days this thread is kind of fun owning all the rigtards so hard.

But some days this thread tilts the **** out of me because I can't understand how anyone can be that stupid.

[KingOfFelt]

tk1133 complaining about colluders at UB as we speak in another thread in the Zoo.

So just to make this clear, one of the biggest rigtards on these forums, plays on one of the only sites that has actually been proven to have cheated the players.

[tk1133]

LoL. I play every site. But regaurdless that would inadvertantly show that I actually care about the security of online poker! However you guys make a joke of it. How many people do you think read this and don't respond b/c they know your shills...I was just told by 4 people in emails to stop coming to this site for that reason. But we can't blame the CEO's of this site or the actual people that set this site up for poker players, b/c I'm sure there's little they could do and they probably don't even know. Again this site is for poker players! Not Poker sites!

[tk1133]

What have you done to own anybody? You think by belittling people you won the arguement?! QPW basicly admitted he works for a poker site but wouldn't say which one...? So please tell us which sites your employed by, so we can come to some sort of agreement as to why your so bias.

[spadebidder]

I have no affiliation with any poker site or poker-related business, and I enjoy refuting rigtard logic. I also know some of the other regular posters in these threads are full-time poker players, not site employees. The one known site employee is one who you already said makes posts you respect.

[tk1133]

Why am I sensing a joint team effort here? You guys fraternal brothers or what?

[tk1133]

Originally Posted by spadebidder

I have no affiliation with any poker site or poker-related business, and I enjoy refuting rigtard logic. I also know some of the other regular posters in these threads are full-time poker players, not site employees. The one known site employee is one who you already said makes posts you respect.

I respect your ideas and views as well. You weren't as offensive as the Fraternal brothers...I really didn't have you in mind when I stated that...but back to the war....

[Rek]

I own all the sites and they are all rigged.

/thread