Quote:
Originally Posted by cilderr
do u know someone who bots spins and where (and how good their ev is)? Spins should be gold mines for botters and no really sophisticated strategies are neccessary.
I assume you are talking about spin n' gos. Yes, there are a handful that target those games. Pretty much every game type has its own dedicated set of botters, some more successful than others. 6max NL ring is actually probably the most difficult, which is why I chose it. Well, I suppose also because it was the game type I had the most personal experience playing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nwb123
@op
-how would you rate bot detection system among the top few sites(pokerstars,888,bovada,ipoker,partypoker,WPN)
-do you think a PLO bot is harder to configure than a NLHE bot (in other words - can we hope that the PLO player pools are less bot-infected than the NLHE ones)
I've never attempted botting on other sites for a variety of reasons including: I already had established accounts with actual play there and regs were familiar with me, traffic, frequent software updates and changes, etc. Generally speaking, Stars is considered off-limits by all except the most experienced and technically savvy of botters. The site seems to be relatively proactive in bot detection. Bovada is considered to be the most bot-friendly and the easiest site for noobs to set up on. A large part of this is because bots are often detected by other players and in Bovada, that is almost impossible due to anonymous play.
Turn-key solutions work well with most sites, although I know that 888 botters seem to frequently have issues related to the poker software itself. WPN networks work fine with turn-key solutions but it's much harder to multitable more than 4 at a time without building your own tablemaps (which is what I did after an initial trial with an off-the-shelf solution) Different iPoker skins have different degrees of difficulty. I guess I should mention that you can't really construct a 'network' bot, you always have to construct a 'site-specific' bot.
In general most sites will look the other way for botters unless the botter garners a massive number of complaints from other players. Bots and poker sites have a mutually beneficial relationship. Bots are the most low-maintenance, high-value customers that most sites have. Bot-operators will never complain about cashout times, won't e-mail support over and over about mundane issues, won't complain about other players, won't be ill-mannered, etc. Good bot-operators will remain low-key and continue to churn out rake for sites and fill up the tables to boost player #'s.
PLO bots are probably somewhat easier to code than NL bots because of a smaller degree of freedom on what betsizes you are likely to see on the table. I was thinking about coding one myself but it would be a significant time commitment and I don't have much experience playing PLO, so a lot of it would be learning how to play well on the fly. Moreover, I would have to construct new tablemaps for 4-card deals which would be annoying in and of itself.