|
|
| Internet Poker Discussions of Internet poker venues. |
05-25-2010, 01:55 AM
|
#151
|
|
banned
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The Kovalchuk sweepstakes
Posts: 358
|
Re: That's the way PS treating a winning player
Quote:
Originally Posted by MicroBob
There should be nothing irritating at all about those posts. Like me and others, the second person you quoted is interested in seeing some HH's and is asking if you might be able to help accomplish this. And he said so in a perfectly reasonable way.
Nobody has accused of anything (except for acting badly in here and overreacting) so stop acting like they have.
They have pointed out that you have posted ZERO evidence of collusion...which is correct. Some of us are curious to see some of the evidence.
flopp's post of their winnings and last date played is quite striking for example. It's not evidence they were colluding but it's still pretty interesting stuff as to how much money potentially cheating players took off the games.
You have stated that you have requested some of the HH's so maybe you'll get those at some point...which would be great. In the meanwhile, you should just chill.
|
Let it go man, it's over with. I explained myself, we really do not need to be going in circles about my actions. It's really derailing the thread, so really, let's drop it.
No it's not evidence that they were cheating but pokerstars concluded they did. We dont really need evidence. They were found guilty by the people it mattered too.
If anyone has questions or whatever pm me. If I get hh I will post them as some of you seem quite curious. I probably wont be posting in here any longer. Good luck with the thread.
|
|
|
05-25-2010, 01:56 AM
|
#152
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: what century is this?
Posts: 8,132
|
Re: That's the way PS treating a winning player
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeavyTrev
how many players would you say you know that are part of some type of collusion ring from china?
|
50,000,000
|
|
|
05-25-2010, 01:59 AM
|
#153
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: what century is this?
Posts: 8,132
|
Re: That's the way PS treating a winning player
Also, stars should reach into the rake they took from those players and repay the players that were scammed. of course this will never happen, but it should
|
|
|
05-25-2010, 02:02 AM
|
#154
|
|
adept
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 727
|
Re: That's the way PS treating a winning player
Quote:
Originally Posted by rizeagainst
So basically this scam totalled
$456,100 USD
- confiscated rolls
------------------
~$400,000?
Who knows what they really got away with if they spent their fpps
|
these are just the players that are in this batch as the superxia and sishun were two players involved back in june of 2009 from the exact same place that I know about and i'm sure there were many many more in between......I would guess that this ring of chinese players got off with over a million if you include fpps if I had to estimate. We will know soon enough as more details keep coming in and Jane we wouldn't mind if you helped us know what exactly went on....I'm just wondering how much i was affected playing nearly 20,000 don's.....makes me sick
|
|
|
05-25-2010, 02:03 AM
|
#155
|
|
old hand
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: 大连,北京
Posts: 1,778
|
Re: That's the way PS treating a winning player
Before i came back to the US for grad school (2006) i used to frequent the underground clubs in northeast china and hangzhou (my wife is from there).
The games were incredibly soft so it was worth being around the sketchy crowd.
I have been approached 3 times by different players asking if i would be interested in investing in their sweatshop operation. Most recently, Jason Ho (see stox scandal) asked me if i would invest in what he referred to as an arbitrage opportunity (LOLOLOLOLOL).
When the very first man approached me i was curious as to what he was talking about (i.e i was naive enough to think it might be something other than cheating), so i checked out his warehouse. It was basically a lan cafe running a bunch of vpn's with bunk beds and stuff and reeked of sweat and BO. There were at least 30 people "working" there, No women.
I politely declined offers to get involved in this nonsense.
|
|
|
05-25-2010, 02:03 AM
|
#156
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: what century is this?
Posts: 8,132
|
Re: That's the way PS treating a winning player
anyone want to set the line for what page of this thread jane makes her last post?
|
|
|
05-25-2010, 02:09 AM
|
#157
|
|
Zero wave are madmen
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Broadcasting Minor League Hockey!
Posts: 58,110
|
Re: That's the way PS treating a winning player
Quote:
Originally Posted by rizeagainst
So basically this scam totalled
$456,100 USD
- confiscated rolls
------------------
~$400,000?
Who knows what they really got away with if they spent their fpps
|
Stars almost certainly didn't confiscate $400k I suspect. The players would have almost certainly been cashing out as they went along. No way of knowing for sure of course. Your points about the FPP's and the rake that Stars profited from the games they were involved in I think are both valid.
The FPP's especially. The value of those things doesn't just vanish. They are pretty much the same as money. Stars should treat them as being worth 1.6c each and include those funds in the refunds, etc.
the rest of the rake part seems fair as well. If 5 of the gang were involved in a 100+4 together then I think taking the $20 in rake that they paid to redistribute as well is appropriate....as well as the $20 in rake that the 5 innocent players contributed on the false assumption that they were participating in a legit game.
Because there is practically zero disclosure on their methodology for redistribution the players are left to simply trust the site to do it all correctly. And it certainly seems reasonable to inquire if it's just the confiscated funds getting redistributed or if they are also including FPP and/or rake value.
I think the whole thing calls for more transparency in several different respects.
|
|
|
05-25-2010, 02:10 AM
|
#158
|
|
old hand
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: 大连,北京
Posts: 1,778
|
Re: That's the way PS treating a winning player
Micro he was saying they netted 400k, not confiscated 400k.
|
|
|
05-25-2010, 02:12 AM
|
#159
|
|
Zero wave are madmen
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Broadcasting Minor League Hockey!
Posts: 58,110
|
Re: That's the way PS treating a winning player
flopp - Sorry to throw more work at you but it might be interesting to see the dates that each of those players STARTED playing. If you don't feel like doing this then perhaps someone else would be willing to tack it on at some point. No rush or anything on that of course. Just something that occurred to me. I saw you mention in the SNE Pursuit thread how you had spent a year playing the DON's...and it just reminded me of the point that we don't seem to know right now how back all this stuff goes.
|
|
|
05-25-2010, 02:19 AM
|
#160
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Resident Spork
Posts: 13,621
|
Re: That's the way PS treating a winning player
I cranked all of the names into 2+2 search to see if anyone had complained about these people before. No allegations, no suspicious hands and only a couple names popped at all. I find it odd that these people could collude for months and no one complained here.
|
|
|
05-25-2010, 02:20 AM
|
#161
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: what century is this?
Posts: 8,132
|
Re: That's the way PS treating a winning player
i don't see why the names should be found on 2p2. if you post on here complaining about possible collusion all everyone will say to you is "email support ldo"
|
|
|
05-25-2010, 02:21 AM
|
#162
|
|
veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: At my computer
Posts: 2,418
|
Re: That's the way PS treating a winning player
People holding their breath waiting for Stars to present some evidence are probably going to turn blue.
Stars will not want to show the specifics of what they examine to determine collusion, nor how they reach their decisions. Such information could aid current or future cheaters.
The best we are likely to get from Stars is what we already have, which is a description of the behaviour indicated by the evidence. We also have from other sources some circumstantial evidence in the form of win statistics. Perhaps some players will produce hand histories. Just don't expect more from Stars. They are well within their rights not to provide actual evidence in this forum, and on balance I prefer that they do not.
And Mitch, no, the fact that Stars closed these accounts is not evidence that these accounts were cheating. It is evidence that Stars' position is that they were cheating. Depending on the actual evidence of cheating, or lack thereof, Stars' decisions could be evidence of Stars' corruption, sound judgment, incompetence, or skill at finding cheaters.
"They said he's guilty, therefore he must be guilty" is a dangerous place to be. Stop going there.
|
|
|
05-25-2010, 02:23 AM
|
#163
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: what century is this?
Posts: 8,132
|
Re: That's the way PS treating a winning player
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoTheMath
And Mitch, no, the fact that Stars closed these accounts is not evidence that these accounts were cheating. It is evidence that Stars' position is that they were cheating. Depending on the actual evidence of cheating, or lack thereof, Stars' decisions could be evidence of Stars' corruption, sound judgment, incompetence, or skill at finding cheaters.
"They said he's guilty, therefore he must be guilty" is a dangerous place to be. Stop going there.
|
Right, because stars has a storied history of banning good honest rakers for no reason, and the chinese online gaming community has such a clean, stellar history.
Somewhere a village is missing their idiot
|
|
|
05-25-2010, 02:27 AM
|
#164
|
|
adept
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,156
|
Re: That's the way PS treating a winning player
Quote:
Originally Posted by iron81
I cranked all of the names into 2+2 search to see if anyone had complained about these people before. No allegations, no suspicious hands and only a couple names popped at all. I find it odd that these people could collude for months and no one complained here.
|
That's why they have so many accounts. 5-6 guys with 50 accounts is a lot harder to track what's going on.
|
|
|
05-25-2010, 02:29 AM
|
#165
|
|
Zero wave are madmen
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Broadcasting Minor League Hockey!
Posts: 58,110
|
Re: That's the way PS treating a winning player
rize - dothemath is correct. When Stars says they have caught a cheater I believe them. But that doesn't mean that their decision qualifies as actual evidence.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:15 PM.
|