Bots on Party? (Insider's view?) - Page 7 - Internet Poker

I just really sank my teeth into this thread. Its very interesting. The reason why I hadnt payed much attention to it until now was that I saw I had the OP on ignore. I knew if I had him on ignore he must have made some pretty idiotic posts. I just went back and reread that multi-accounting thread that caused me to assume anything he would ever say probably would not be worth reading. Let me just say that I agree with Bobos assessment fwiw.

Quote

10-03-2014 , 04:16 AM

#152

ArtySmokes

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 6,999

So wrongfoot is also SpokSir?

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpokSir

Party /Stars best in catching robots and acting fast. Rest are way behind in race

Quote:

Originally Posted by wrongfoot

iPoker does not hang you if you have two Accounts accidentally. They ask you to make a choice and choose one and stick to that. Party does exactly the same.

How many 2+2 accounts has he got?

Quote

10-03-2014 , 04:42 AM

#153

norway20188888

grinder

Join Date: Jun 2010 Posts: 424

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/28.../#post43769193

Quote

10-03-2014 , 06:22 AM

#154

centebakkie

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Oct 2011 Posts: 3,583

Party Integrity LMAO

Quote

10-03-2014 , 11:24 AM

#155

AnFiieLd.

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2013 Posts: 7,258

Quote:

Originally Posted by sparky999

There is a Russian player on Full Tilt that does exactly this - he is the only winning player I can ever recall doing this and he has similar although not exactly the same stats in my database as have been posted in this thread for the other two players. I only have 40k hands on him though so obviously some sample bias involved.

I think I might ask game security to look into it as something has always struck me as really strange about him and I could never put my finger on it.

Any ideas on why they were banned yet if it wasn't because they were bots?

Smart move imo, hopefully you can update if anything is found!

Quote

10-03-2014 , 11:34 AM

#156

YouSureSir

veteran

Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 2,069

Wow this is getting interesting...

Quote

10-03-2014 , 03:12 PM

#157

Mubsy Bogues

banned

Join Date: Jul 2014 Posts: 1,265

forumserver.twoplustwo.com seems to be on a server in San Antonio, Texas

Quote

10-03-2014 , 10:18 PM

#158

Any2Cards2008

journeyman

Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 385

so do we have more confirmed similiar accounts to blu and jack?? or is eveyr1 just spitting in the wind??

Quote

10-04-2014 , 09:38 AM

#159

NerdSuperfly

veteran

Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 2,172

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sciolist

So your simplest explanation is that someone joined 2 + 2 in Nov 2012, hacked Lessu's computer, coincidentally also a 2 + 2er, posted a mildly edited version of one of his emails as the OP, then went inactive?

Some men just want to watch the world burn

Quote

10-04-2014 , 10:04 AM

#160

Zenzor

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 5,420

This is why Party needs to end its ridiculous policy of allowing screen name changes. Every time bot accounts get banned, the programmers will implement improved anti-detection measures, making them harder to catch in the future.

Quote

10-04-2014 , 11:01 AM

#161

Wiki

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 5,939

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zenzor

Non sequitur alert!

The second sentence is almost certainly correct.

The first sentence may well be correct (although it's something of a matter of opinion).

However, the second sentence does not relate to the first.

Robot makers will still try and find better ways to go undetected whether or not Party changes the name policy.

Quote

10-04-2014 , 11:05 AM

#162

Wiki

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 5,939

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schlager233

Another thing not mentioned about jackaroo and bluedevill specifically for anyone who has played with them is their random changes in preflop opening sizes. A lot of times one may go 2.5 or 2x from mp say if there's a shortie in the sb or something, but these 2 would go anywhere from 4x to min from every position seemingly at random. I've never seen any other players do this besides these 2 guys. If it were some advanced bot, its possible they added some sort of preflop sizing randomization to make them even less suspicious?

So doing something that no one else does is a good way to be less suspicious?

And having two players do exactly the same thing is a good way to stay under the radar?

Quote

10-04-2014 , 12:21 PM

#163

ouinosino

adept

Join Date: Jan 2013 Posts: 838

wow housebots who can see the cards and make some extramoney for partypoker. clever business

Quote

10-04-2014 , 02:20 PM

#164

kevinb1983

old hand

Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 1,632

fwiw I just posted in the Winning Poker Network sub forum yesterday about something very similar. someone who seen my post PM'd me about this thread. I don't have the largest sample sizes on the guys but they look way too similar to me. anyone with more experience with this kind of stuff want to offer up their opinion?

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/21...ounts-1479384/

Quote

10-05-2014 , 02:56 AM

#165

5thStreetHog

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 7,687

Quote:

Originally Posted by ouinosino

wow housebots who can see the cards and make some extramoney for partypoker. clever business

Huh?

Quote

10-05-2014 , 03:16 AM

#166

Sciolist

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 17,526

He's trolling (or dumb, but what's the difference?). Not to mention missing the important part of this...

Quote

10-05-2014 , 10:06 PM

#167

DrSalamanka

stranger

Join Date: Oct 2014 Posts: 9

Anybody noticed that a lot of the nicknames accused here for beeing bots are no longer playing since around end of september!?

Quote

10-06-2014 , 05:19 AM

#168

ArtySmokes

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 6,999

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrSalamanka

Anybody noticed that a lot of the nicknames accused here for beeing bots are no longer playing since around end of september!?

It's already been pointed out in the thread.

Are you perhaps a shill (or the OP using yet another account), trying to get someone to say "Well played Party Poker?"

Because that won't do. Party let these bots get away with cheating for way too long. And Party also allowed private emails from their users to leak out.
Party Poker ****ed up.

Quote

10-06-2014 , 09:09 AM

#169

Any2Cards2008

journeyman

Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 385

Where the hell is a public response for this nonsense form party poker...?? breach of confidentiality and all of us just agreeing we are playing in unfair surroundings...I for 1 am not impressed and am disgusted at the handlings of party poker! LONG TIME reg...enough is enough. Time for media!

Quote

10-07-2014 , 03:41 AM

#170

POSLARI553

enthusiast

Join Date: Aug 2012 Posts: 84

Quote:

Originally Posted by Letricle

I compiled a list of russians that could be bots, those who are more likely than the others are underlined:

zoobi doobi/rebell3ear/NaOH_/wannaboverev/myx0m0p/
char1esp0nz1/DJATAKI/cunipoker/H0nnAnn0h/artem0sha/MooHaha/Ant1social/pintofstoutpls/gambler.888/tundraman/PPMascot/angr1b1rd/EntropiAx

myxomop had exactly same lines as jackaroo in certain spots. and they are some pretty fcn weird lines to take.

not sure whether they actually are bots but they are playing according to same "logic" or program or whatever they are using.