Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunth0807
It is not common practice for casinos to just ban blackjack players for winning. There have been some exceptions because of strong suspicions and/or proof of cheating.
How can you even compare poker, a game of skil,l where the object is to "win" against the other players, to blackjack, a game played against the house where odd's are always in favor of the casino?
I am not comparing the games at all.
However, US casinos are banning card counters, right? And they are barring them without having to give a reason. They simply refuse to take their business, which is within their rights. Why wouldn't they be able to do that with winning poker players as well (if they wanted to)?
I am not endorsing that behaviour at all, just saying that the theory "This wouldn't be possible in the US" is simply wrong.
Last edited by SanchoHH; 10-25-2012 at 09:28 AM.