Having a few really good regs does not make the stars game hard at all, under 400nl stars is the softest site if you can find a table(though very soft at zoom). so many regfishes and whales.

Also for the last 6-8months, z200 has been extremely soft compared to the last couple years. No one good can seriously say that z100-z200 are hard pools nowadays, especialy with the extremely low rake compared to other networks.

z10 on party has less fish than z200 on stars.

Makes no sense. You would have to be actively playing these games a lot to know how soft they were. And no active reg would be dumb enough to advertise if they really were soft.

most lower stake poker players are somewhat mentally challenged, as seen by this guy thinking z200 is the hardest game around when you get a fish or two on each table.

The good regs, dont bother with 200nl
the decent regs, are usualy autistic and are too worried about the lack of rakeback to play there(even though the rake is a lot lower already)
the ****** regs are welcome

I seriously doubt the person i answered is a winning z200 reg over more than few K hands. It takes a special kind of dumb to think a game with so many fish is hard. The only reason z200 winrates are lower than bumhunting winrates is because you don't get to create as many +ev exploitable spots through table dynamics with fishes.

tldr: people with brains already know z200 is soft, not worried about bad regs or kids with aspergers showing up.

I believe somehow your analysis must be flawed,which normal 'reg' would rake 100ks of hands and be losing after that?
I consider a reg somebody that is somehow making money by playing poker,if I would lose after a year I would quit.I guess most others would do as well.

If you can lose 1bb/100 at the tables but get 4bb/100 in rakeback at the same time then you're winning more than most.

It seems that you are talking out of your ass, dude. I played over 300k hands @z200 and I am almost +4bb ev/100. I played about 650k @ z100 prior to this, and about 250k hands @ z25 and z50. Higher limits are much tougher. I have a friend who crushes z500 over a huge sample and occasionally plays nlhe1k, nlhe5k, nlhe10k. He would confirm my words. Z200 is just below those limits in terms of dificulty.

As an active reg I wish they were soft. They are effing not.

yes games are soft, now show your lifetime 200z graphs, lol

While this isn't true 100% of the time, a way to quickly filter for intelligent people is to skip by those who can't express their thoughts without using "autistic", "******", and "aspergers" (sic) all in the same post.

I wonder if you're bright enough to hold back on that nonsense in the chat box.

Bobo, those were not insults. If you've ever met low stake "pro's", they are for the most part on the spectrum. Especially those that relocate to poorer countries.

This.

Without professional psychiatric experience and a face to face evaluation no one is in a position to make a competent diagnosis.

Doing it en-bloc is even more absurd.

On the other hand, it's quite possible to tell from a couple of posts that someone who throws spurious medical diagnoses around like confetti is 'a bit of a muppet'.

Doubling down on sweeping generalizations just makes you look worse.

Not the best reg at this limit for sure, but considering I started 1,5 years ago at z25, I think it's not that bad.

P.S. My cropping skills are off the charts too.