Action behind. Bs hand is toast.

wow this post has taken on a lot

not that it matters but dealer did get a 'talking to' about a few things here, and a 'last warning' was issued, and yes it is always done in private- I do not believe in public thrashing just to appease the players.

one thing - this board was NEVER being re-dealt as A exposed his cards thinking hand was over, the only choice was misdeal or Bs hand is dead (or below), and I have stated I am in favor of Bs hand being dead.

However, one idea for a ruling I stated was never touched on is that B can only be in for $10 from each and the AI and call are a side pot - this I would consider but may not feel great about it, I would like to hear what people think about this one.

I don't like it because it let's him get a free all-in, which is an advantage he doesn't deserve since he would obviously not let action pass him purposefully with his stronger holdings.

But if you are convinced it was accidental and excusable it's not terrible.

It seems to me it sets up an incentive for the player to remain silent if he would otherwise fold (or reluctantly call]

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk