Quote:
Originally Posted by DetroitJunkie
I dont think anyone would have an issue if this hypo was that 2 tipped before going AI....though doing it right before going AI is quirky too. Dealer gets KITN for taking it, even though I understand the desire for a $4 in what I assume is a 1-2, 1-3 or maybe a 2-5 game. The ruling would have to be that the $4 goes back into his stack and the bet is $203- how it gets there is a different issue, as crappy as this would be to fix it would have to be done. However, the stink it would create at the table would be so bad that I cant imagine someone would make such a fuss about it.
So tell us already - how did the hand end?
As I said in the post- player 3 reraises. Hence the issue is moot, that opened up the betting for player 1. Player 1 calls the reraise. Player 1 was a station. How the hand went down after, I forget.
My point was - say player 3 just calls.
If that happened, action back to player 1 to call or fold to a less than now legal raise.
As I also said, player 1 didn't actually care about it not opening up the raise during the hand. He did joke about taking money from what might be his pot.
It was 2/5. Was a friendly game at the time. What does the stakes have to do with anything?
Doubt anyone would make a stink? The point is what if player 3 flats and player 1 wants to shove? Player 1 and 3 both cover player 2 by a lot. The issue isn't $4 from the pot per se. The issue is, it technically is not a legal raise. When I said, what if it mattered; I thought it was obvious that I meant what if it matter relative the the action. What if player 3 flats and player 1 wants to 3 bet?
Last edited by RJT; 07-02-2017 at 11:35 AM.