Quote:
Originally Posted by Fore
And where they don't have counting shufflers the dealer will be counting the deck. Yes he could have brought with him. But when he took it that deck would be short and once that was known the tapes would come out. If he isn't real good he is is real trouble.
You say that. In London this practice is not employed unless there is an occurrence for example card on floor. Does every card room in US count deck every hand?
Anyway, more likely he already had extra cards from another deck.
There are just too many coincidences in this story.
Also, in my experience it is highly unusual for a card room to make any restitution for a dealer or ruling mistake, especially for such an amount. The floor makes a ruling and that is binding and that is accepted by most of us. Even if it's a bad ruling.
The floor at the time of the event was probably too distracted to even check the deck. What if, later after scrutinising video and the deck they realised the scam. Of course, the casino would not reveal their suspicions to hero. But, that would however explain why they reinstated him and also made a large exgratia payment. In isolation, it's not as if this is even the worst ruling in the world, as discretion is always allowed.
My point is maybe the villain wasn't an operator. But, the whole episode as described fits the bill and if the OP was "I got cheated at a casino" then all the points I made would have been discussed in the thread as to how he was cheated.