Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The CCP Moderation Discussion Thread (please read OP before posting) The CCP Moderation Discussion Thread (please read OP before posting)

12-01-2016 , 08:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EvilGreebo
Please don't try to make the 'free speech' argument.

It doesn't apply. This site is still private property and "free speech" applies to laws about what you can say, and where, not forum rules about the same.
Please leave that empty trope behind in high school. Free vs censored speech is a life issue and government is one of many theaters where it is played out.
The CCP Moderation Discussion Thread (please read OP before posting) Quote
12-01-2016 , 08:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeadMoneyWalking
Free vs censored speech is a life issue and government is one of many theaters where it is played out.
What does this even mean?
The CCP Moderation Discussion Thread (please read OP before posting) Quote
12-01-2016 , 09:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapini
I thought it was really ****ty of him to respond like that to me when he knew what he was doing was wrong in the first place. But I'm done with the issue now.
If it helps, please note the time stamps involved. This was posted before our pm exchange, when I thought your other post was meant seriously. (Again - tone on the internet...)

But as to knowing what I was doing was wrong - no I am sorry, that came off poorly in our exchange. I did not know that deliberately bypassing the filter was cause for deletion. (At the time I did attribute the deletion to self-bias as a mod). In my first exchange by "making a point" I meant I *expected* the word to be filtered hence the bypass, not that I knew it meant deletion. In the second when I said "I know that" i meant that I know it now. Poorly chosen words on my part.
The CCP Moderation Discussion Thread (please read OP before posting) Quote
12-01-2016 , 09:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EvilGreebo
If it helps, please note the time stamps involved. This was posted before our pm exchange, when I thought your other post was meant seriously. (Again - tone on the internet...)

But as to knowing what I was doing was wrong - no I am sorry, that came off poorly in our exchange. I did not know that deliberately bypassing the filter was cause for deletion. (At the time I did attribute the deletion to self-bias as a mod). In my first exchange by "making a point" I meant I *expected* the word to be filtered hence the bypass, not that I knew it meant deletion. In the second when I said "I know that" i meant that I know it now. Poorly chosen words on my part.
Fair enough. I understand the disconnect now. Thanks for the explanation.
The CCP Moderation Discussion Thread (please read OP before posting) Quote
12-01-2016 , 10:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Didace
What does this even mean?
It means you don't need a paycheck from Uncle Sam to censor someone.
The CCP Moderation Discussion Thread (please read OP before posting) Quote
12-01-2016 , 10:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeadMoneyWalking
It means you don't need a paycheck from Uncle Sam to censor someone.
What does that have to do with free speech?
The CCP Moderation Discussion Thread (please read OP before posting) Quote
12-12-2016 , 01:24 PM
I'd like to request that arguments over BTN straddling and other types of straddling get moved out of venue specific threads to their own (containment) thread
The CCP Moderation Discussion Thread (please read OP before posting) Quote
12-12-2016 , 01:30 PM
Acknowledged. I've initiated discussion with Rapini and dinesh.
The CCP Moderation Discussion Thread (please read OP before posting) Quote
12-12-2016 , 06:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EvilGreebo
I'd like to request that arguments over BTN straddling and other types of straddling get moved out of venue specific threads to their own (containment) thread
FWIW , I second this request.

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
The CCP Moderation Discussion Thread (please read OP before posting) Quote
12-12-2016 , 06:57 PM
Isn't straddling discussion strategy and isn't allowed in LCP anyway? If they're talking about getting a button straddle or other straddle option allowed in their venue or something specific to that room, why should it go in a containment thread?
The CCP Moderation Discussion Thread (please read OP before posting) Quote
12-12-2016 , 07:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EvilGreebo
I'd like to request that arguments over BTN straddling and other types of straddling get moved out of venue specific threads to their own (containment) thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lattimer
Acknowledged. I've initiated discussion with Rapini and dinesh.
If you contain it, I would suggest permitting additional threads/discussion if the discussion of modifying the rules comes up.
The CCP Moderation Discussion Thread (please read OP before posting) Quote
12-12-2016 , 08:23 PM
FWIW, we're not considering a containment thread, just extracting the discussion into its own thread. It's currently dominating the venue thread, and many are simply not interested in it and want to discuss other things, but are getting drowned out. Also, the discussion can be applied to future venues facing a similar situation. But, it certainly is relevant to that venue NOW and many want a resolution one way or the other. So this is what we're debating.
The CCP Moderation Discussion Thread (please read OP before posting) Quote
12-13-2016 , 10:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lattimer
FWIW, we're not considering a containment thread, just extracting the discussion into its own thread. It's currently dominating the venue thread, and many are simply not interested in it and want to discuss other things, but are getting drowned out. Also, the discussion can be applied to future venues facing a similar situation. But, it certainly is relevant to that venue NOW and many want a resolution one way or the other. So this is what we're debating.
That would be good too. The big thing is the discussion of the MS straddle isn't venue specific.
The CCP Moderation Discussion Thread (please read OP before posting) Quote
12-13-2016 , 11:59 AM
Since it seems to be dying out, one solution is to let it finish where it is, and then extract later so it can be referenced/continued in the future.
The CCP Moderation Discussion Thread (please read OP before posting) Quote
12-15-2016 , 01:29 PM
Not sure if this is the correct place, but can a Mod please change the title of my most recent thread in LCP, "Seat and Position Leveling" to "Seat and Position Selection"?

I changed the topic of my thread without changing the title. Thanks!
The CCP Moderation Discussion Thread (please read OP before posting) Quote
12-15-2016 , 01:38 PM
Done.

FYI for future reference, if you ever need a mod's attention for something, the best thing to do is to report the post and explain your request. We get notified via email immediately.
The CCP Moderation Discussion Thread (please read OP before posting) Quote
01-13-2017 , 01:45 PM
Thread in Question

While Worst floor ruling ever? was a bad title, hypothetical ruling is just as vague and uninformative.

Plus, the mod is essentially saying to OP, 'This never happened'.
The CCP Moderation Discussion Thread (please read OP before posting) Quote
01-13-2017 , 02:33 PM
I changed it to something more informative.

It doesn't matter whether it happened because it's still a discussion-worthy scenario.
The CCP Moderation Discussion Thread (please read OP before posting) Quote
01-27-2017 , 01:42 PM
Pretty sure I posted a comment in here yesterday ... Mods? ... Was it offensive? GL
The CCP Moderation Discussion Thread (please read OP before posting) Quote
01-27-2017 , 03:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by answer20
Pretty sure I posted a comment in here yesterday ... Mods? ... Was it offensive? GL
I didn't do it, but reading it, it was pretty low content. It was probably 50/50 that one of us might have popped it.
The CCP Moderation Discussion Thread (please read OP before posting) Quote
01-28-2017 , 07:49 PM
Latimer / dinesh -

Can you please take a look at the post I made in the MGM National Harbor Resort & Casino (Oxon Hill, MD); FAQ in OP and undelete it, making whatever edits are necessary for it to be acceptable? It's around post 1490 or so.

Here's what it looked like:

******************************

******************************

I'm assuming Rapini deleted it because I referred to him as lolRapini, but I don't actually know who deleted it or why. As far as I can tell, it doesn't break any forum rules other than possibly the reference to "lolRapini". My assumption comes from this PM just sent from Rapini:

Quote:
Hi chopstick,

Please reread the LCP forum guidelines before posting again. Future violations could result in the suspension of your account. The guidelines are here:

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/27...-16-a-1532627/


Regards,
Rapini

I had made a post a few weeks ago in which I named a few dealers because I was complimenting them and wanted the poker room manager to know. Rapini edited their names & descriptions out of that post. I looked at the rules, realized I had accidentally broken them with my compliments due to using names, and let it go because I was technically in the wrong, no matter how well intentioned.

What it looks like to me is that Rapini is now mad that I referred to him as lolRapini, and decided to retaliate by deleting a decent post and threatening to suspend my account over it.

Rapini has a long history of... being Rapini, hence why I am addressing this post to the two of you instead of him. Along with many others, I have critiqued his modding in the past, and based on his consistently Rapiniesque behavior over the years, I'm confident that there is no way that he would be unbiased in addressing this.



Rapini - I obviously can't stop you from replying or deleting / editing this, but if you could try not being you just this once and let the other two handle it, that would be a refreshing change. I'm not going to engage on you with this for the reasons stated above, so anything you respond with directed to me is a waste of your time.
The CCP Moderation Discussion Thread (please read OP before posting) Quote
01-28-2017 , 09:52 PM
I will do it, but yes, if you want to not have your posts deleted, don't do stuff like that. None of us appreciate it, and we reserve the right to delete posts that violate the LCP rules. Thanks.
The CCP Moderation Discussion Thread (please read OP before posting) Quote
01-28-2017 , 10:25 PM
Thank you, dinesh.
The CCP Moderation Discussion Thread (please read OP before posting) Quote
01-30-2017 , 10:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chopstick
What it looks like to me is that Rapini is now mad that I referred to him as lolRapini, and decided to retaliate by deleting a decent post and threatening to suspend my account over it.
I don't care what you call me. You commented on moderation action outside the moderation discussion thread, which is why the post was deleted. Next time, don't break the rules and your post won't be deleted.
The CCP Moderation Discussion Thread (please read OP before posting) Quote
01-31-2017 , 03:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapini
Just deleted a few posts related to taxes. Please ask questions related to taxes in the Poker Legislation forum. Thank you.
Lol, you guys delete the Racener Hard Rock talk, you guys delete tax questions about the Hard Rock and if they send out tax forms to winners, is there anything we're actually allowed to talk about in this thread? Jeez. I mean it's not like this thread is the holy grail and feel like both topics were questions or discussions that had to do specifically with the Hard Rock, as we know the Seminoles run different than other card rooms. Think it was a question specific to the Hard Rock and how they handle their tax forms and burdening a whole other tax thread on one specific room seems pretty ridiculous.
The CCP Moderation Discussion Thread (please read OP before posting) Quote

      
m