Quote:
Originally Posted by psandman
I think there is a certain point where we have to say .... a player can decide not to play without penalty.
Imagine the game gets to heads up and there is one seat at the other table. Should you not break the game and let them draw for the seat ..... or do you wait to see which player breaks first and says he won't play heads up?
Another problem with your policy is that you give the players the power to oust a player when he takes a bathroom break.
5 handed game four seats at other games .... they don't want to draw for it. A player gets up to go to the bathroom and the other four players call the floor and ask to break .....
This is an important aspect of table breaking. Happened to me just a few days ago.
I was playing at Red Rock (happy to out the room in hopes of change) on graveyard of course. We got to 5 handed. My big blind was going to come up next hand. "I'm going to go light up, I'll miss the big blind and buy the button guys".
So while I go light up and the hand finishes, the DEALER, says to the tourist, "you want to play 4 handed? he's gone." Referring to me. The tourist says no, and the dealer says there's 3 seats at the other game, so the remaining 3 can go.
Now just moments before, we agreed to keep the game going until 1 more seat opened so only 1 would be shut out on a draw for the seats rather than 2. 2/3 of the remaining regs took advantage "innocently" and didnt say a word and moved.
Not a single hand was dealt where I missed my BB, nor the tourist missed his, but the other 3 were allowed to move w/o a draw.
I had a long talk with the shift supervisor about this as it was just a ******ed event all around. He did say he would speak to the poker room manager about changing the rule so when short handed people are not penalized.
***** 20 minutes pass and the two "advantage takers" both go bust. I sit down to play, and not too long after I pick up JJ and flop JJ and end up winning $500 for the high hand of the period.