Quote:
Originally Posted by aoFrantic
Meh, not enough info to be sure.
That. Without more detail I have to assume good faith. The floor should rule based on whether you could have reasonably seen that there were oversize chips. If they were buried in standard-height stacks and barely visible, they shouldn't play, regardless of intent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DisRuptive1
I don't think players are entitled to an exact count of unwagered chips.
True. (Although I've seen countless dealers/rooms give one anyway, but those are house rules.) However,
"Any player is entitled to a clear view of an opponent’s chips. Higher denomination chips should be easily visible."
RROP Procedures Paragraph 18
I suggest you literally ask for a "clear view." IMO an opponent stacking chips in 23 or 18 rather than round numbers like 20 or 25 is denying you a clear view, but it would take several stacks (or a high denom stack) for this to matter very much.
If the house rule is to give a precise count, 100% of the time when you ask for a view, they'll volunteer the count.
Also relevant:
"Because the amount of a wager at big-bet poker has such a wide range, a player who has taken action based on a gross misunderstanding of the amount wagered needs some protection. "
In this case you both took aggressive action and didn't understand the amount you were wagering, so the rule doesn't directly apply, but one can infer a principle that could apply. Your demeanor should absolutely be taken into account in a ruling.
http://www.pokercoach.us/robspkrrules4.htm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deal!
$100min/$200max
Many places, it would matter whether he was moving involuntarily (broken game/must move) or voluntarily. Rules vary but IMO, he should not be allowed to sit with more than the max if he moved voluntarily.
If it makes you happier, it's not really a $480 lesson because he wasn't a lock to win at the time you went all-in. There's a nonzero chance he might fold a better hand (he tanked!), that he might hold a worse hand, that you might draw out, or even that he might call with AQ or worse. Maybe a $250 lesson plus $230 of run-bad.
Last edited by AKQJ10; 12-27-2016 at 02:07 AM.