Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPowers411
Not sure I agree with this. If you understand short stack strategy your edge will be massive in this game where the avg villain is playing way too loose.
Understand hands that can make top pair are valuable in this game, while suited connectors and low pairs lose value.
But to say this is not poker and it's just shove any two without having a strategy is BS.
And then you say to play $1-$3 because you can bluff people, but then tell him to play tighter than normal, so not quite sure what strategy you recommend he play in the $300 max game.
Not saying there is NO STRATEGY however, when you figure the average preflop raise is $15-20, and the average continuation bet is usually $25-$30 after the flop, assuming everyone has the max buy in and rebuys everytime they fall below $100 (isn't very likely) there's not much room to push people off a hand, what are you going to do, repop them for $25.00 to get them off a $200 pot? If you are looking to improve your game, the 1/3 is the way to do it, if you're looking to play short stack poker, fine, but also going to be a lot more variance if you go card dead/flop dead in a game like that though.
Also, you can tighten up and still make plays against weaker players in a 1/3 game, where after a continuation bet, you still have $160 behind you vs. $25 behind you.
Don't really think it's even arguable to be honest, yes the 1/2 with a 50bb buy in is good to teach you some short stack poker, but if you're looking to improve your overall game, 1/3 is the way to go, and if you play 500 hours of 1/2 50bb buy in and believe that's how the game is played, and think it's going to help you become a better 1/3 player, or be played even remotely the same way, I think he'll be in for a rude awakening with stacks that shallow.