Quote:
Originally Posted by sevencard2003
now does everyone agree thats still enough for NL if i play $40-100 or $50-200 NL?
It's enough to play profitably and build up your roll with little risk of ruin --
IF YOU UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCES IN SHORT-STACK PLAY ENOUGH TO BEAT IT.
You'll be playing very tight, waiting for a premium hand and trying to get all-in with it ASAP.
If Vegas small-stakes games are like other places, I have no doubt that the super-tight strategy of Miller's GSIHE (AK, TT+ in EP; AQ, 99+ in MP; AT+, KQ, 77+ in LP; bring in for a raise; OK to limp in with small pairs or SCs in LP; decide whether to call reraises behind you based on your remaining stack size) would be profitable.
Would it be interesting to play? Well, um, no. But if you're short-rolled, having fun playing poker is probably secondary.
In any case,
NO "BANKROLL" IS ENOUGH IF YOU CAN'T BEAT THE GAME YOU'RE PLAYING IN. You might just be running really bad but the fact that you can't keep from blowing "bankroll" on video poker doesn't suggest that you have the discipline to play a winning short-stack strategy.
Last edited by AKQJ10; 06-09-2008 at 01:03 PM.