arent you surprised I am not banned still after you have reported ? lol you are such a coward, you can keep flaming and get away, u started giving **** u eat it now Monteroy, you get no respect.

It is Sunday morning and you have been going at it for an hour or so. Whether you get banned or not is not really much of a concern to me, as I have dealt with lower IQ rage-a-holics like you many times before. You are hardly special or particularly interesting. I doubt even that long time riggie will support you as he knows when to back away from people of your kind, because you are not a genuine riggie, rather you are just a life failure that is always angry at the world.

Anyway, I will save us both time and simply put you on ignore at this point, and you can continue to rage for as long as you like until you get banned or until you get bored with it once I ignore you. No real difference to me, because in the end you do not matter.

All the best.

You got that in before I could hit the ignore feature. You are quick with the rage!

Anyway, thanks for the advertising link (though pretty sure 2+2 does not allow them), and you should realize that many will think you are a hired shill all along by me at this point.

Also, one of my partners handles the Facebook/twitter stuff. His writing style is quite a bit different than mine, but I find it fun when I see it.

Pretty impressive that you cannot get a single piece of research to be correct .

You are now properly on ignore. Quit all forms of poker.


All the best.

hahaa ha hit the iggy button now, why keep reading the amusing posts, why all this defense, why u should u even care?

I am not banned yet hehehehe

don't tell me what I will or won't do, go run ur staking machine, and juice the players, or the horses.

Become a real man not a shill.

We need to know a lot of secrets and we are coming to ur apt

That's the only thing you can whine about and after all these years you still don't realize that you are actually claiming that you and your friends are so simple minded, all it takes is some dudes on the internet who say "Not rigged, Move along"...Priceless.

Why don't you try to polish the image of the rigtard race? Like, making us believe that at least one if your brethen is genuine and and has more than one braincell.

But with you as the rigtard spokesman, you won't get anywhere. Says a lot about your kind.

So here are the major differnce I see between most rigged posts and me
1. I do not beleive any site makes 1 particular person win or lose. They don wait for u to sign on then decide how they will me me I win or lose on that day.
2. I am up money lifetime online. I don't post these as a disgruntled losing player.
3. I do beleive sites keep games even as much as they can. How they do that exactly I have no idea and as I stated before no one will ever find out.
4. I will continue to play online as it's more convenient for me, and I will just have to except the fact that I will win less then I should.
5. Lots of bad players play onljne so u will see more bad beats( although this goes agianst big rustys claim that players onljne are better)
6. No amount of regulation is gonna change anything about the way cards are dealt.
7. The government does not, will not, and should not tell it's people everything.
8. I don't for the life of me understand why people trust gaming sites so much more then Other companies.

You missed this one:

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...postcount=4300




EDIT:

Also, do you realize you are quoting posts that were made 5 years ago?

He's been trolling the rigged threads for years under various names. Don't bother. I suspect he is employed by one of the anti-gambling outfits like FOTF. No joke.

I guess you missed these given that you never replied to them, but have made new unrelated posts in this thread, including the above quoted post:


http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...postcount=4292

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...postcount=4294

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...postcount=4298

What did I miss. I am just telling u that I would not put anythjn past a site trying to make more money. U know what I think they do. I don't deny that. I think they make certain situations occur more often then would be common ad these situations are mostly 50-50 situations. Not sure what u are getting at

Well:

1. In the first link, I posted data showing that flopped flush draws were completing around 35% of the time and not 50% of the time as you had stated. And I posted a link and a quote of a post I made years ago to attempt to explain why your following quote is incorrect:

2. You keep pointing out won hand percentages of around 50% or something. In the second link, I attempt to explain that every player winning an equal number of hands would not cause players to be even. In fact, I would be surprised if even the best players in the world could have a won hand % of greater than just a little over 100 divided by the number of players at the table. Eg.: If there were 6 players at the table: 100 divided by 6 = 16.67%. Without looking at any data, I think I would be pretty surprised if even the best players in the world could achieve a won hand % of too much over 20% without significantly decreasing the amount of money they win (but I haven't looked at any data so I am not going to try to pick any sort of exact number). (Obviously one could maximize one's won hand % by going all-in pre-flop every hand, but one would lose a lot of money doing this.) This is a game of small edges.

In this second link, I pointed out that the goal of poker is not to win hands, but to win money. Further, I posted a chart showing that I have only won 17.5% of my hands, but have won money.

3. In the third link, I point out that you ignored the posts I made in the first two links. Your first post after I made those two posts was instead a weird sort of ad hominem that wasn't clearly directed at any person in particular.

I then ask a few very simple straight forward questions, such questions being: (a) Who exactly you were addressing with the ad hominem post; and (b) What exactly the terms "decent amount" and "much" meant in your ad hominem post in the context they were therein used. You didn't answer.

I don't disagree with your post about how often the flush will hit if someof your suit is in the muck. I am saying u have less outs to hit it. I guess the percentage is the same. I don't disagree with you.

Set when a riggie agrees with u guys the posts stop for a while. So riggies need to be confrontational to keep the posts coming. This post is no fun if people agree with each other. So I will keep it going if I can.

I once did I study back when poker table ratings let u see peolle stats. In 90% of all cases players had the biggest winning and biggest losing day within 10 days of each other. Win huge then huge lose or huge lose then win huge???? Sounds like a pretty even game to me.

Please take your "deal is rigged" evidence to the other thread at http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/28...dition-255990/, thank you.