how to interpret the outcome of EV analysis
05-27-2016
, 07:59 PM
05-28-2016
, 09:03 AM
hmm... I dont understand this 
. Let's say we're playing a tournament, we have 3000 chips and we're on the river, we calculate that if we go all-in, we win 500 chips. We also know that if we bet 1500, we win 400 chips, so slightly less. Now which is the better play?
Wouldnt we rather win less but remain in the tournament, the times we lose? Dont we have to put what we're risking into relation to what we're winning?
. Let's say we're playing a tournament, we have 3000 chips and we're on the river, we calculate that if we go all-in, we win 500 chips. We also know that if we bet 1500, we win 400 chips, so slightly less. Now which is the better play?Wouldnt we rather win less but remain in the tournament, the times we lose? Dont we have to put what we're risking into relation to what we're winning?
05-28-2016
, 01:12 PM
Quote:
hmm... I dont understand this . Let's say we're playing a tournament, we have 3000 chips and we're on the river, we calculate that if we go all-in, we win 500 chips. We also know that if we bet 1500, we win 400 chips, so slightly less. Now which is the better play?
Wouldnt we rather win less but remain in the tournament, the times we lose? Dont we have to put what we're risking into relation to what we're winning?
. Let's say we're playing a tournament, we have 3000 chips and we're on the river, we calculate that if we go all-in, we win 500 chips. We also know that if we bet 1500, we win 400 chips, so slightly less. Now which is the better play?Wouldnt we rather win less but remain in the tournament, the times we lose? Dont we have to put what we're risking into relation to what we're winning?
06-03-2016
, 04:56 PM
