|
|
| Home Poker Discussions of home poker games |
05-31-2012, 05:38 PM
|
#31
|
|
veteran
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,045
|
Re: What is your NLH ruling, on a semi-exposed card?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gobbs
I scanned all of the responses and I didn't see that anybody mentioned this yet. A "semi-exposed card" is the equivalent of being "kind of pregnant." Just like a woman is either pregnant or not pregnant, a card is either exposed or not exposed. There is no semi-exposed. The fact that nobody (or only one person) saw the exposed card is irrelevant. What makes a card "exposed" or "not exposed" is if somebody could have seen it.
Therefore, my ruling is simple. The card was exposed and follow the rules for exposed cards.
Also, the post about insisting dealers follow protocol is dead-on perfect. That's why I won't even play in a home game with a rotating deal. It just causes way too many problems.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lottery Larry
It must be nice to play in an area where you can decide what games to attend, on criteria such as this.
Congrats.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pfapfap
I've been known to take over dealing at other games. Not my first night there, but dear goodness it drives me insane sometimes.
Larry, you can't convince me there aren't multiple home games every night of the week in the greater Philadelphia area. C'mon now. There's enough poker interest in the area to open two cardrooms.
|
The home games I play in (I've been to LL's many times but not in the past year or two) are always MUCH more fun than the casino. I LOVE going to PARX/Borgata and like going to Harrah's-Chester but that always seems more like a business trip. Srs bzns! Home games are more casual/fun with the hopes of making $100 or so.
I barely scanned the replies but they are plentiful so I'm sure a consensus was reached.
In my game (.50-$1 NL/PLO/PLO8 mix with $2-$4 limit games...dealers calls) when someone deals like that I always ask them to (next time) burn one then put three face down then flop em. Standard casino procedure. I just like things to be uniform which helps avoid problems. The atmosphere still stays very casual.
|
|
|
05-31-2012, 06:37 PM
|
#32
|
|
old hand
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 1,881
|
Re: What is your NLH ruling, on a semi-exposed card?
I can see handling this two ways - I would do #1
1. Let the BB make his raise. Then show the card to everyone leaving it on top of the deck. Explain that once action is completed on the flop that card will be set aside and the next two dealt. It will then be put back in the stub which will be reshuffled and the final flop card will be dealt. You don't put out cards or reshuffle right away since you don't want cards sitting there exposed (should the backs be marked).
2. Let the bb act. Show the card everyone. Replace on top of deck. Everyone now acts in turn to the bb's raise. Deal flop which will include this card. Don't show card to BB prior to him acting as all other players acted prior to knowing this card. BB knowing it prior to acting would give him knowledge other players didn't have.
|
|
|
05-31-2012, 08:26 PM
|
#33
|
|
Pooh-Bah
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jupiter
Posts: 3,815
|
Re: What is your NLH ruling, on a semi-exposed card?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Small Fry
I can see handling this two ways - I would do #1
1. Let the BB make his raise. Then show the card to everyone leaving it on top of the deck. Explain that once action is completed on the flop that card will be set aside and the next two dealt. It will then be put back in the stub which will be reshuffled and the final flop card will be dealt. You don't put out cards or reshuffle right away since you don't want cards sitting there exposed (should the backs be marked).
2. Let the bb act. Show the card everyone. Replace on top of deck. Everyone now acts in turn to the bb's raise. Deal flop which will include this card. Don't show card to BB prior to him acting as all other players acted prior to knowing this card. BB knowing it prior to acting would give him knowledge other players didn't have.
|
The problem with both your solutions is the BB makes a bet and the rest of the table gets to see the exposed card before they decide whether to call. This gives an advantage to the rest of the table.
|
|
|
05-31-2012, 09:47 PM
|
#34
|
|
grinder
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE NJ
Posts: 464
|
Re: What is your NLH ruling, on a semi-exposed card?
If its really low limit, let the dealer cover the exposed card. Allow the BB to complete his action, and Dealer can either fold or call (no raise allowed). Then the rest of the table can make their own decision. Dealer gets a KITN.
|
|
|
05-31-2012, 11:35 PM
|
#35
|
|
I ♥ KITNs
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 4,942
|
Re: What is your NLH ruling, on a semi-exposed card?
Quote:
Originally Posted by pfapfap
Most people here are playing 25/50¢ stakes or thereabouts. Hiring a permanent dealer is not economical.
I hosted a successful multi-table self-dealt game for as many years as I had space available for it. I played in another weekly self-dealt game that has been running now for eight years.
|
Yep. All the home games in which I play/played are low stakes cash & tourneys, and they've all been rotating deal except for one. Even that one used two player-dealers who alternated every other hand (rather than a dedicated non-playing dealer).
IME rotating deal is the norm for home games.
|
|
|
06-01-2012, 07:26 AM
|
#36
|
|
enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: McDonough, GA
Posts: 74
|
Re: What is your NLH ruling, on a semi-exposed card?
Wow...I'm truly shocked about this rotating deal thing....and who said anything about hiring a dedicated dealer? That's one way to go, but definitely not the only way to avoid a rotating deal. Heck, I don't know anybody who prefers a rotating deal after they've played without it.
Anyway, the rules of how to handle an exposed card are pretty simple and easy. If the card was exposed, expose it to the table so everybody see it and reshuffle so that all cards have an equal chance of being selected next - that way, no disadvantage to the BB.
KC
|
|
|
06-01-2012, 03:45 PM
|
#37
|
|
Livin' the dream as a Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 8,439
|
Re: What is your NLH ruling, on a semi-exposed card?
Quote:
Originally Posted by pfapfap
This is why I insist that people follow proper casino procedure.
|
Well, that aught prevent anything from going wrong.
Did 'ya hear that boys? We're going to follow procedure tonight!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Larry
And I want YOUR ruling. Quoting RRoP is pointless
|
It's not pointless. It's where we get the baseline...
It's an exposed card. Announce and expose the card to everyone, shuffle up, and get the action back on whomever the action was on when the dealer jumped the gun and continue.
I, personally, don't care about the mystical true order of the cards, so I don't preserve or set aide cards 2 and 3 of the flop. As far as I'm concerned the deck is magically being constantly shuffled while it's in the dealer's hand...
Nobody's happy when you expose a card, especially when you add a twist ahead of time like, "This helps someone, so choose wisely."
Stop.
Expose.
Shuffle.
Resume.
|
|
|
06-01-2012, 10:02 PM
|
#38
|
|
HP JoY 2011 wienerbucket
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: ...
Posts: 20,279
|
Re: What is your NLH ruling, on a semi-exposed card?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gobbs
and who said anything about hiring a dedicated dealer? That's one way to go, but definitely not the only way to avoid a rotating deal. Heck, I don't know anybody who prefers a rotating deal after they've played without it.
|
Yes, most people would prefer that other people deal for them.
Could you tell us what you're talking about, then?
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Palimax
Well, that aught prevent anything from going wrong.
Did 'ya hear that boys? We're going to follow procedure tonight!
|
It helps a great deal, as a matter of fact. I don't understand why a dismissive sarcastic attitude is even remotely appropriate here.
|
|
|
06-01-2012, 11:14 PM
|
#39
|
|
Livin' the dream as a Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 8,439
|
Re: What is your NLH ruling, on a semi-exposed card?
Quote:
Originally Posted by pfapfap
It helps a great deal, as a matter of fact. I don't understand why a dismissive sarcastic attitude is even remotely appropriate here.
|
I'd suggest that you use the report button  on my posts if you find them inappropriate, but I know that doesn't give you as much attention as you'd like.
I apologize to everyone else for not mentally ignoring pfapfap to the level that I normally do. My bad, as usual.
|
|
|
06-02-2012, 10:54 AM
|
#40
|
|
Home Poker Pimp
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: HP in da HOOWWSSS! (NW of Philly)
Posts: 19,605
|
Re: What is your NLH ruling, on a semi-exposed card?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gobbs
Are you guys joking? I don't know of any regularly-scheduled home games with a rotating deal that survived. It doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure out that rotating deals are nothing but trouble and it certainly doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out how to have a home game with dedicated dealers.
I guess I am lucky. I don't think I could find a rotating deal home game if I tried (and why on Earth would I try?).
KC
|
Interesting environment. Can I assume that all of the dedicated dealer games are also raked?
edit- I see. Evidently the home games in your area, the host is always the dedicated dealer? Or someone volunteers... for free?
Or, maybe I'm not understanding your use of "rotating deal"... since it seems strange to me that the only games in your area have dedicated dealers.
I can't think of a regular home game that I've EVER played in, where there was a dedicated dealer. I've done it once or twice, at one home game when I busted out, but it wasn't a raked game and it was an unusual occurance that I volunteered for.
Last edited by Lottery Larry; 06-02-2012 at 11:01 AM.
|
|
|
06-02-2012, 10:58 AM
|
#41
|
|
Home Poker Pimp
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: HP in da HOOWWSSS! (NW of Philly)
Posts: 19,605
|
Re: What is your NLH ruling, on a semi-exposed card?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Small Fry
2. Let the bb act. Show the card everyone. Replace on top of deck. Everyone now acts in turn to the bb's raise. Deal flop which will include this card. Don't show card to BB prior to him acting as all other players acted prior to knowing this card. BB knowing it prior to acting would give him knowledge other players didn't have.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidNB
The problem with both your solutions is the BB makes a bet and the rest of the table gets to see the exposed card before they decide whether to call. This gives an advantage to the rest of the table.
|
This.... and the dealer, who hasn't acted yet to the presumed BB raise, HAS seen the card.
I like the thought process, SF, but I don't think it works here.
|
|
|
06-02-2012, 10:58 AM
|
#42
|
|
Home Poker Pimp
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: HP in da HOOWWSSS! (NW of Philly)
Posts: 19,605
|
Re: What is your NLH ruling, on a semi-exposed card?
Quote:
Originally Posted by pfapfap
It helps a great deal, as a matter of fact. I don't understand why a dismissive sarcastic attitude is even remotely appropriate here.
|
What the hell are you, a 2+2 rookie?
and that would be true, even IF you weren't responding to your special friend...
Last edited by Lottery Larry; 06-02-2012 at 11:04 AM.
|
|
|
06-02-2012, 11:03 AM
|
#43
|
|
Home Poker Pimp
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: HP in da HOOWWSSS! (NW of Philly)
Posts: 19,605
|
Re: What is your NLH ruling, on a semi-exposed card?
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Palimax
It's not pointless. It's where we get the baseline...
|
RRoP is not the baseline of home poker game procedures. Those rules, and other rulebooks like it, may be the way that we here would prefer things, but (until recently) you can't tell me that you grew up in home games that handed out casino-standard rulebooks....
... can you?
|
|
|
06-02-2012, 04:05 PM
|
#44
|
|
Livin' the dream as a Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 8,439
|
Re: What is your NLH ruling, on a semi-exposed card?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lottery Larry
you can't tell me that you grew up in home games that handed out casino-standard rulebooks....
... can you?
|
Most of the poker we played early had a copy of Hoyle near us, complete with matching red/blue/white chips for three bet sizes.
I can't honestly remember how we were solving rules issues when I was in college. I'm sure we had plenty of exposed cards and arguments about wildcards, but they all escape me.
|
|
|
06-02-2012, 11:33 PM
|
#45
|
|
enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: McDonough, GA
Posts: 74
|
Re: What is your NLH ruling, on a semi-exposed card?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lottery Larry
Interesting environment. Can I assume that all of the dedicated dealer games are also raked?
edit- I see. Evidently the home games in your area, the host is always the dedicated dealer? Or someone volunteers... for free?
Or, maybe I'm not understanding your use of "rotating deal"... since it seems strange to me that the only games in your area have dedicated dealers.
I can't think of a regular home game that I've EVER played in, where there was a dedicated dealer. I've done it once or twice, at one home game when I busted out, but it wasn't a raked game and it was an unusual occurance that I volunteered for.
|
Several ways to go about it:
- Host deals and plays.
- Host deals and doesn't play.
- Paid dealer (no rake or dealer cut, just a dealer toke for extra chips that goes to the dealer)
- Paid dealer with a small rake or a portion of the entry fee withheld for the dealer (and possibly a dealer toke for extra chips).
- Regular game in which players take turns being the dedicated dealer for an entire tournament and, if lucky, somebody who gets knocked out will take over. This is the most common scenario. Think about it. Would you rather there be a rotating deal in which you have to deal every tournament and consistently have problems, or deal every once in a while and not have to worry about dealing at all the rest of the time. This is far superior. Plus, the dealer is always sitting in the middle - no problems with dealers sitting on the end of the oval table.
These scenarios, in my experience, are all far more common than a rotating deal. Of course, that's just my experience, but I do play in some pretty good home games, I guess.
KC
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:07 AM.
|