Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > General Poker Discussion > Home Poker

Notices

Home Poker Discussions of home poker games

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-15-2009, 12:36 PM   #16
old hand
 
redtrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,518
Re: Sustaining a game.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dismalstudent99 View Post
If they are "pros", they're not going to waste their time in your game unless it's 2/5 uncapped or higher.

Most internet players aren't good at all, just like "normal" players.
I have 1 pro I let play regularly (because he's very polite and considerate, recruits donks, and goes so far as to give up his seat for a fish and wait to get back in), 3 that I have banned, and at least 3 more that would play if I let them. The games they otherwise play in are 1/2 degen/pro (some of them are pros when they're running good and dealers when on the books) and 1/2 well heeled donks (at best). My games are 80% well heeled donks. Trust me they want in.
redtrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009, 12:05 AM   #17
veteran
 
dismalstudent99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Riverside, Calif.
Posts: 3,059
Re: Sustaining a game.

Quote:
Originally Posted by redtrain View Post
I have 1 pro I let play regularly (because he's very polite and considerate, recruits donks, and goes so far as to give up his seat for a fish and wait to get back in), 3 that I have banned, and at least 3 more that would play if I let them. The games they otherwise play in are 1/2 degen/pro (some of them are pros when they're running good and dealers when on the books) and 1/2 well heeled donks (at best). My games are 80% well heeled donks. Trust me they want in.

I guess it depends on the definition of "pro."

If someone actually plays poker to pay all the bills (1k NL?), I'd be surprised if they'd give up a good night to play in a 1/2 game, unless it was unusually deep and donkey.

What's your buy-in range?
dismalstudent99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009, 09:40 AM   #18
old hand
 
redtrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,518
Re: Sustaining a game.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dismalstudent99 View Post
I guess it depends on the definition of "pro."

If someone actually plays poker to pay all the bills (1k NL?), I'd be surprised if they'd give up a good night to play in a 1/2 game, unless it was unusually deep and donkey.

What's your buy-in range?
5/5 300-1000 and 5/10 500 uncapped
redtrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2012, 02:43 PM   #19
Pooh-Bah
 
Aidan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: home games
Posts: 5,451
Re: Sustaining a game.

Bump
Aidan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2012, 06:01 PM   #20
old hand
 
avaholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: ATX
Posts: 1,611
Re: Sustaining a game.

Thanks for the bump Aidan. Good info.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dismalstudent99 View Post
If they are "pros", they're not going to waste their time in your game unless it's 2/5 uncapped or higher.

Most internet players aren't good at all, just like "normal" players.
You're right, any "pro" and I think that term is used loosely, is not going to play in a low staked games.

You're wrong on internet players though. Any winning internet player is a big favorite in any random home game.
avaholic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2012, 07:42 PM   #21
enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 50
Re: Sustaining a game.

Quote:
Originally Posted by avaholic View Post

You're wrong on internet players though. Any winning internet player is a big favorite in any random home game.

+1
2nl_donk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2012, 08:46 PM   #22
HP JoY 2011 wienerbucket
 
pfapfap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: ...
Posts: 19,440
Re: Sustaining a game.

Eh. Maybe on one night. But unless the online player has learned how to adjust to the drastically different style of play, and be friendly and gracious doing so, then he's not going to be invited to many games.

At the WSOP this past year, the online players were great at the betting and triple range merging and all of that. They also had VERY quiet tables. Except when they all ended up at the same table in a tournament, then they talked poker non-stop. The older professionals talked about everything EXCEPT for poker.

When the online studs were in cash games, softer money would often pick up and find another table. One time I saw four casual gamblers leave a table full of kids within 20 minutes. Then the players asked the dealer to find some fish for them.

It doesn't matter how good you are, if you can't attract people with a lesser skillset to play with you.
pfapfap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2012, 11:49 PM   #23
adept
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 749
Re: Sustaining a game.

This is true but just because a player is an online grinder doesn't automatically make them a doosh hole @ the live table.

As someone who played exclusively online pre black friday and now plays only live i have not had much trouble making the adjustment. I am not a person most people would call friendly but i am polite and don't offend people.

Doosh holes ruin live tables and scare the fish away not online players.
Tjmj90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2012, 11:55 PM   #24
HP JoY 2011 wienerbucket
 
pfapfap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: ...
Posts: 19,440
Re: Sustaining a game.

For sure, true that. I didn't mean to come on so strong.

It's a self-selecting group. The online grinders who haven't figured out how to socialize are going to make sure you know they're online grinders. Those who are both successful online and know how to play in live games generally don't advertise their online activities.
pfapfap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2012, 12:52 AM   #25
grinder
 
ClevelandWasp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Lake and Geauga
Posts: 472
Re: Sustaining a game.

If you end up recruiting more new guys, watch out for the situation where two or three new guys who are friends with each other want to try out your game. I know this is counter-intuitive, but new guys should be solos. They can bring a friend after they have played a few times and established themselves as okay.

Last month I let a guy play in my game who I know from the neighborhood, but had never played poker with or been around him when he was drinking. And, I stupidly let him bring a friend that I had never met. Well, they both got very drunk and obnoxious, and eventually I had to (as politely as possible) throw them out. Think about it this way: one lone guy is less likely to get all sloppy, arguing with everyone and refusing to play by the rules. But, when his boy is there by his side to back him up, the dynamic is very different. At one point I was legitimately concerned that it was about to get physical, and I just can't imagine one guy getting so far out of line if they weren't there to feed off each other. Never again.
ClevelandWasp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2012, 04:22 AM   #26
journeyman
 
Akhanar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 272
Re: Sustaining a game.

Quote:
Originally Posted by spader1 View Post
id suggest adding a holdem nl night to get people more interested in coming.
NOT this. Don't change your game to recruit people or you'll end up recruiting people who want to play a different game than you, and you'll never get it back on track.
Akhanar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2012, 10:03 AM   #27
centurion
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 192
Re: Sustaining a game.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dismalstudent99 View Post
Most internet players aren't good at all, just like "normal" players.
Quote:
Originally Posted by avaholic View Post
You're wrong on internet players though. Any winning internet player is a big favorite in any random home game.
He's right in the sense that less than 10% of "internet players" are winning internet players, and the rest do tend to be not very good at all.

If you want to say that winning poker players are winning poker players, then that's a true and fair statement. But it's a bit ldo, ldo.


Quote:
Originally Posted by pfapfap View Post
You gotta keep recruiting. Go to other games, invite people you like.

I've not had good results with advertising online, the game is invite only. But I encourage all players to invite their friends.
These are my experiences as well. We've successfully recruited from local casino poker rooms. I keep harboring hopes that my wife and I can scour the local "bar leagues" to find some folks that'd fit in with our home crowd, but we've never actually done this.

Two of our favorite regulars come from internet recruiting (we staged a few meetup games just to screen folks for our regular game). We probably had 25 different people come through via meetup to end up with 2 regulars. It wasn't really efficient time-wise, but good regs are hard to come by, so I suppose it's a bit of a wash. We won't be repeating that process again, however.

Last edited by The Meal; 02-05-2012 at 10:16 AM. Reason: clarity
The Meal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2012, 06:03 PM   #28
old hand
 
avaholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: ATX
Posts: 1,611
Re: Sustaining a game.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Meal View Post
If you want to say that winning poker players are winning poker players, then that's a true and fair statement. But it's a bit ldo, ldo.
Then change my statement to break even/slightly losing internet players and it still applies.
avaholic is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive