Quote:
Originally Posted by BEANO52
Scenario:
Friendly home game type tourney. Mixture of super fishy types and a handful of people that actually know what they're doing. $40 entry with unlimited rebuys first 2 hours. Structure designed to last 5-6 hours. Normal to pitch in $5-10 to bubble boy. 18 players with some rebuys.
Payouts with re-entries are 1st $400, 2nd $300, 3rd $200, 4th $100, $30 to high hand. We all agree with 7 left, top 4 pay $10 to bubble boy.
We get down to 6 players and someone mentions a 6 way chop (again, we are paying 4 places). Most everyone is up for it. That's pretty much $165 each. I will chop 99% of the time, but I have never heard mention of a chop before even being in the money in my life (15+ years of tournament play). I said, no way I chop before the bubble, it was a weird situation and I had that guilty feeling, sorta.
I should add, the mention of chop came up right after I won a large pot and probably had 35%+ of total chips. a couple players were down to 2-3 blinds.
Then @ 3 players they mentioned chop again. One solid player said "nope, he refused, it was a one time deal". We play and I call this guys shove, him: 8Ts, me AJo, straight runs out on board. Next hand, he says wanna chop, I agree, we 3 way chop $300 each.
In hindsight, a 6 way chop would have been $165 for a $40 entry tourney. I have no doubt I would have finished in the top 3 (but anything could have happened) 2 players were extremely short stacked. And obviously whether I walked away with 0, 100, 165 or 400, it wasn't life changing. It just seemed weird to chop when we weren't even in the money yet.
Was I wrong? Opinions?
Your wrong to think there is something wrong with it. Your not wrong to elect not to chop at any time.
Btw you should not feel a chop as to even. If they propose an even chop you can always counter offer and ask for more money.
A chop is simply an agreement among the remaining players .... any agreement you reach is fair because the players agree to it .....