Originally Posted by pfapfap
Low limit no limit is no limit played for low limits. Low stakes if you prefer. Yes, it could also stand to be better written, but the intent is clear. "10/20 limit" is less clear. Larry was generally helpful and supportive in the thread, your mockery is unwarranted.
Define low limit for me. Low stakes to you might be low stakes to someone else.
Inconsistency in both the posts, so the criticism is warranted. How can you fail to see the irony here? If you're going to criticize someone, make sure you don't make the same mistake. I was sticking up for the OP.
And for LL not being mocking, "lazy typing" seems to fit the bill, which he was guilty of as well when he typed "low-limit NL hold'em".