Bizarre River bluff at home game, thoughts plz - Page 6 - Home Poker Games

pfapfap · 05-16-2011, 03:10 AM

I think it's great. I also enjoy the gamble. This is a game, after all. It should be fun!

QJQJ · 07-01-2012, 07:54 AM

Miserable beggars :P bump again just to punish u imo.

DavidNB · 07-01-2012, 09:23 AM

Wow, you should of folded preflop. Hitting a ace on the flop with a useless kicker= your going to lose money

Sal Bandini · 07-01-2012, 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by QJQJ

ye but it hardly needs to b lost in translation, pretty obv from the rest of the post that we're not playing a limit game, oh wel we got there in the end lol

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lottery Larry

My suggestion, for future posts, is to take a little more time and clear up these inconsistencies.. and your lazy typing.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lottery Larry

Situation: low-limit NL hold'em, with 5 players.

Straddler King blind-raises, in middle position. The dealer and SB call, with the BB still to act.

The dealer burns and starts lifting the first flop card, when the BB stops the action because they want to re-raise. Only the dealer has seen the top card on the flop.

BB raises. What is your ruling about:

a) What to do with the semi-exposed first card (SEC) of the flop?

b) What action(s) can the dealer take, if no one else has seen the SEC yet?

And I want YOUR ruling. Quoting RRoP is pointless- we can all look up standard casino rules ourselves.

You mean like this inconsistency?

MUHAHAHAHAHAHA

pfapfap · 07-02-2012, 01:10 AM

I don't get it.

javi · 07-02-2012, 01:19 AM

The real lesson to learn here is to always raise those donkbets until someone gives you a reason not to. I have only seen a donkbet for value like once in my life. It's otherwise always some dumb**** hand thats trying to "find out where I'm at". Just auto-raise all donkbets without even thinking about it. When players start jamming or snap calling, then adjust.

Sal Bandini · 07-02-2012, 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pfapfap

I don't get it.

OP was criticized for saying 10p/20p limits nlhe.

What is low limit no limit?

pfapfap · 07-02-2012, 07:32 PM

Low limit no limit is no limit played for low limits. Low stakes if you prefer. Yes, it could also stand to be better written, but the intent is clear. "10/20 limit" is less clear. Larry was generally helpful and supportive in the thread, your mockery is unwarranted.

Sal Bandini · 07-03-2012, 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pfapfap

Low limit no limit is no limit played for low limits. Low stakes if you prefer. Yes, it could also stand to be better written, but the intent is clear. "10/20 limit" is less clear. Larry was generally helpful and supportive in the thread, your mockery is unwarranted.

Define low limit for me. Low stakes to you might be low stakes to someone else.

Inconsistency in both the posts, so the criticism is warranted. How can you fail to see the irony here? If you're going to criticize someone, make sure you don't make the same mistake. I was sticking up for the OP.

And for LL not being mocking, "lazy typing" seems to fit the bill, which he was guilty of as well when he typed "low-limit NL hold'em".