Pacific, $0.45 Buy-in (50/100 blinds, 10 ante) No Limit Hold'em Tournament, 9 Players
Poker Tools Powered By
Holdem Manager - The Ultimate
Poker Software Suite. View Hand
#37707559
UTG+1: 5,970 (59.7 bb)
UTG+2: 6,148 (61.5 bb)
MP1: 4,970 (49.7 bb)
MP2: 13,881 (138.8 bb)
MP3: 9,210 (92.1 bb)
CO: 4,453 (44.5 bb)
Hero (BTN): 4,801 (48 bb)
SB: 11,068 (110.7 bb)
BB: 3,308 (33.1 bb)
Preflop: Hero is BTN with T
T
:: ::
UTG+1 raises to 300, 5 folds, Hero calls 300, SB calls 250,
BB folds
Flop: (1,090) J
Q
T
(3 players)
SB bets 200, UTG+1 calls 200,
Hero raises to 1,045, SB calls 845,
UTG+1 raises to 5,660 and is all-in, Hero calls 3,446 and is all-in,
SB folds
Turn: (11,117) K
(2 players, 2 are all-in)
River: (11,117) 5
(2 players, 2 are all-in)
Original raiser is 7% PFR in 14 hands and UTG, that is why I did not 3 bet.
On the flop, I think my reraise is ok or do you think otherwise? I guess UTG puts me on AQ and goes all in, I was afraid that he had AK but I called anyway. Should I have fold? Is his all in ok from his pov?
Also, what should we do with those ridiculous mini bets, in this case 20% of the pot bet from the SB, I usually see some fishy guys like to do even 10% or less bets. In my experience in the micro-stakes I see this happens in these scenarios:
1. As a value bet when fish has the nuts or a good hand. He wants everyone to call.
2. When there is a mw pot because many limp preflop and on the flop in early position one guy do this to see where is he at (or also as a mini bluff,) meaning he wants to discourage people who has nothing after the flop. I guess this kind of work some times. Let's say UTG micro raises on the flop, if I am on UTG+1, I would fold if have nothing and many people act like this using the same logic, until maybe someone calls because has middle pair or a better hand.
What I usually do is if I have a good hand, I raise it at least half pot and see how the other people act, many fold but some of them call. I think this is ok, but if the OR 3bet or goes all in, I know I might be in trouble because it could be the scenario number 1.
What do you think?