Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > Tournament Poker > Small Stakes MTT

Notices

Small Stakes MTT Discussion and analysis of small stakes MTT strategy

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-20-2012, 08:25 AM   #1
adept
 
Proudwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: afraid to press the call button
Posts: 1,026
Mid pair on monotone flop

Bwin hand a week ago. villain is typical loose calling station.

I'm on Co with a ~20-30bb stack with T8

villain flats on bb

flop
QT3
bb checks, i bet half pot
Here i thought i should bet since my hand is really weak and will be outdrawn really often.

turn
T
bb checks, i bet 3/4 pot

River
6
bb bets pot (i've got only a psb left behind)


i'm auto calling river but still not sure if flop was a bet or check behind
Proudwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2012, 08:27 AM   #2
deviation of equilibrium
 
furo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 27,492
Re: Mid pair on monotone flop

if he is loose aggressive checking flop is > betting it and vise versa
furo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2012, 09:42 AM   #3
enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 59
Re: Mid pair on monotone flop

nice hand sir
Y."TheSnaiL" is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2012, 10:58 AM   #4
grinder
 
MatteoBounce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 653
Re: Mid pair on monotone flop

looks good. would have played it the same
MatteoBounce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2012, 11:57 AM   #5
I immediately regret this decision
 
fidstar-poker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: a "safe word" is for limit players
Posts: 4,488
Re: Mid pair on monotone flop

Looks good to me.
fidstar-poker is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2012, 12:12 PM   #6
centurion
 
matthenearly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 149
Re: Mid pair on monotone flop

seems fine
matthenearly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2012, 11:06 PM   #7
centurion
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 159
Re: Mid pair on monotone flop

Quote:
Originally Posted by Proudwalker View Post
Bwin hand a week ago. villain is typical loose calling station.

I'm on Co with a ~20-30bb stack with T8

villain flats on bb

flop
QT3
bb checks, i bet half pot
Here i thought i should bet since my hand is really weak and will be outdrawn really often.

turn
T
bb checks, i bet 3/4 pot

River
6
bb bets pot (i've got only a psb left behind)


i'm auto calling river but still not sure if flop was a bet or check behind
Your reasons for betting are flawed. You either bet for value or as a bluff, not protection or information.

Protection and/or information are by products of betting but NEVER should be the primary reason for betting.

In this case you would either be going for thin value or turning your hand into a bluff.

If you're going for thin value your thinking is, since he is loose calling station, he calls here W/ worse Tx and clubs. You'd have to live W/ the fact that you have to give up a lot of rivers.

If you're betting as a bluff you're trying to get a Qx to fold or a Qx W/ a club or a better T.

Both scenarios, because of how you described villain, don't turn much of a profit.
ISTAKDEADPPL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 05:58 AM   #8
centurion
 
matthenearly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 149
Re: Mid pair on monotone flop

Quote:
Originally Posted by ISTAKDEADPPL View Post
Your reasons for betting are flawed. You either bet for value or as a bluff, not protection or information.

Protection and/or information are by products of betting but NEVER should be the primary reason for betting.

.
I agree about 'information', but i think it is wrong to say that 'protection' can never be a primary reason for betting. We can bet to make people call with worse (valuebetting), to make them fold better (bluffing) but we can also bet when their range includes a lot of hands which we beat, but which have substantial equity vs our hand, and which he will fold to a bet (protection). For example, 22 on A73rbw. He is not calling with worse, he is most likely not folding any better, but it is a good idea to bet, because any random hand that he has will have at least 6 outs vs our hand. We do not want him to realise the equity of a hand like J10, which he will fold to a bet. We are 'protecting' our hand by betting.

This particular hand is another good example, as any random low club in his range has 9 outs vs our hand, so we want to bet to protect.

This is how i see it anyway
matthenearly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 12:38 PM   #9
centurion
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 159
Re: Mid pair on monotone flop

Quote:
Originally Posted by matthenearly View Post
I agree about 'information', but i think it is wrong to say that 'protection' can never be a primary reason for betting. We can bet to make people call with worse (valuebetting), to make them fold better (bluffing) but we can also bet when their range includes a lot of hands which we beat, but which have substantial equity vs our hand, and which he will fold to a bet (protection). For example, 22 on A73rbw. He is not calling with worse, he is most likely not folding any better, but it is a good idea to bet, because any random hand that he has will have at least 6 outs vs our hand. We do not want him to realise the equity of a hand like J10, which he will fold to a bet. We are 'protecting' our hand by betting.

This particular hand is another good example, as any random low club in his range has 9 outs vs our hand, so we want to bet to protect.

This is how i see it anyway

This may be how you see it, and I hope I don't come off as a prick, but you're incorrect. The example you just gave, we are betting for thin value, not for protection. The protection is a positive outcome of betting for thin value.

Why would you ever bet to "protect" a hand in poker? Think about it? it's a game where you're trying to relieve people of chips. It's a game of equity smashing together, hand values fluctuating up and down on every street, position and player tendencies.

Or you could say that the goal of the game is to make the most money. If you're trying to make the most money the most efficient way of doing so is value betting. The second most efficient way is bluffing because you're getting value out of a hand that has less equity share in the pot than others.

What does protection do? Protection doesn't make you profit. It's not a primary reason to bet because it won't make you money if your sole reason for betting EVERY hand is protection.

Your goal isn't to protect when you're a 65/35 favorite, it's to maximize value.
ISTAKDEADPPL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 04:54 PM   #10
adept
 
Proudwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: afraid to press the call button
Posts: 1,026
Re: Mid pair on monotone flop

Quote:
Originally Posted by ISTAKDEADPPL View Post
Your reasons for betting are flawed. You either bet for value or as a bluff, not protection or information.
Did i say i was betting for either of these reasons? in my op i said that i bet cause "my hand is really weak and will be outdrawn really often"
Which means that i want to make villain fold a hand that shouldn't fold.
And in case that he flats with draws i'm ahead (not by a long% but still ahead).
Proudwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 05:39 PM   #11
centurion
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 159
Re: Mid pair on monotone flop

Quote:
Originally Posted by Proudwalker View Post
Did i say i was betting for either of these reasons? in my op i said that i bet cause "my hand is really weak and will be outdrawn really often"
Which means that i want to make villain fold a hand that shouldn't fold.
And in case that he flats with draws i'm ahead (not by a long% but still ahead).
What? I'm trying to tell you your reasons for betting are incorrect. Those aren't logical reasons for betting.

So what you should have said is that you are turning your hand into a bluff not "I want to make villain fold a hand that shouldn't fold."

If you want to take offense to it go ahead but ask anyone who is somewhat competent in tournament theory and that's exactly what they will tell you

Here. Read this

That should clear up any kind of confusion on the issue

Last edited by ISTAKDEADPPL; 08-21-2012 at 05:44 PM.
ISTAKDEADPPL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 07:50 PM   #12
adept
 
Proudwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: afraid to press the call button
Posts: 1,026
Re: Mid pair on monotone flop

Quote:
Originally Posted by ISTAKDEADPPL View Post
So what you should have said is that you are turning your hand into a bluff not "I want to make villain fold a hand that shouldn't fold."

Making a villain fold a hand that he shouldn't fold = bluff

just saying

Last edited by Proudwalker; 08-21-2012 at 07:57 PM. Reason: also where did you get any hint of me betting for info??
Proudwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 08:19 PM   #13
banned
 
Elephants_pride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 5,043
Re: Mid pair on monotone flop

bet flop, smaller ott.
River - villain dependent.

Flop bet is for VALUE. Turn one as well.
Elephants_pride is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive