PokerStars Hand #156323661650: Tournament #1618861304, $7.50+$7.50+$1.50 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level XXXIII (3000/6000) - 2016/07/23 15:12:06 NZT [2016/07/22 23:12:06 ET]
Table '1618861304 100' 9-max Seat #8 is the button
Seat 1: lobobsso22 (98402 in chips)
Seat 2: lekinhobh (145729 in chips)
Seat 3: bartsvha (258564 in chips)
Seat 4: DqdoKosta (229640 in chips) Seat 5: GhRibeiro (67514 in chips)
Seat 6: Plummer333 (426120 in chips)
Seat 8: maxkul (209788 in chips) Seat 9: Hero (90777 in chips)
lobobsso22: posts the ante 900
lekinhobh: posts the ante 900
bartsvha: posts the ante 900
DqdoKosta: posts the ante 900
GhRibeiro: posts the ante 900
Plummer333: posts the ante 900
maxkul: posts the ante 900
GinkEca: posts the ante 900
GinkEca: posts small blind 3000
lobobsso22: posts big blind 6000
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to GinkEca [Qs Jc]
lekinhobh: folds
bartsvha: folds
DqdoKosta: folds
GhRibeiro: raises 60614 to 66614 and is all-in
Plummer333: folds
maxkul: folds GinkEca: ???
I have someone behind me slightly covering, opponent is very profitable
Bounty obv matters, because we cover. If villain shoves optimally we doing ok. Most of the time thsts not the case though.
Exactly and since this was posted on a Saturday it makes it even more important as they make up 75% of the prizepool. If his bounty is significant then its a call.
Being a bounty builder and deep, it will depend on the bounty. If you put the bounty next to the players stacks it will be possible to get to a decision.
My original line of thinking was he is a winning player, his range must be relatively wide.
The more i think about it though, he may actually not be as wide as i initially thought given that peoples calling ranges must have widened due to the Bounty factor.
I called at the time, thinking this was a good spot to gather chips and have a shot at going deeper regardless of bounty, so i think my initial call reasoning was incorrect.
He turned over 55, and Big blind also called with AK.
