|
|
| Small Stakes MTT Discussion and analysis of small stakes MTT strategy |
06-13-2012, 10:28 AM
|
#1
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: near your blinds
Posts: 9,407
|
Lagging with TJo vs a tight reg
I have been playing laggy(~ 38/32/20). a few players tried to play back and I had good hands or called them light and won. At this point it's safe to say most of the players are kind of pissed off but so far the ones at the table haven't shown any indications they're playing back apart from tightening up vs me and not taking my 3bets as seriously.
This is a full-ring but for a few hands went down to 6-handed
Villain is playing tight something like 16/9 and is a 3 gold stars on merge. so probably a grinder reg. But I have no reads on him. He's not been playing back BvB
Merge - $0+$0.00|<> NL - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 3
SB: 15,705.00
BB: 13,170.00
UTG: 6,990.00
Hero (MP): 25,103.00
CO: 10,711.00
BTN: 14,438.00
SB posts ante 25.00, BB posts ante 25.00, UTG posts ante 25.00, Hero posts ante 25.00, CO posts ante 25.00, BTN posts ante 25.00, SB posts SB 125.00, BB posts BB 250.00
Pre Flop: (525.00) Hero has T  J
fold, Hero raises to 555.00, CO calls 555.00, fold, fold, fold
Flop: (1635.00, 2 players) J  3  3
Hero bets 817.00, CO raises to 2,800.00, Hero ?
Last edited by desperad0oo7; 06-13-2012 at 10:36 AM.
|
|
|
06-13-2012, 11:03 AM
|
#2
|
|
journeyman
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 238
|
Re: Lagging with TJo vs a tight reg
He is tight but didn't raise you, which doesn't mean weakness because of your horrible image. He can have pretty much everything but you would have to tend towards medium pairs+ and KJ+ because of his tightness.
He asks you 2k on a 5.2k pot which means 38%, not good considering he has a high chance of trapping you and having already two pair. The ten is not even considered as an out. So your outs are 2 J and it's not even sure since he can have QJ-KJ. Bleh bleh, sucks a bit.
If you 3 bet, you are basically saying that you've got Jx, JJ+ or a trey. If he 4bets you, you puke then have to call his jam ?
If you call you are ready to call his jam on the turn or jam yourself any card (Alone in the dark).
If you fold you are showing that you are not so serious on your flop bets and it must already be the case.
Since it's the first time he is defending his blind, since he is tight... I would fold and see if he repeats this pattern so I can punish him next time. I still got a huge M and would love to continue to hit the table with it.
|
|
|
06-13-2012, 11:15 AM
|
#3
|
|
deviation of equilibrium
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 27,375
|
Re: Lagging with TJo vs a tight reg
looks like an info raise, prob call and fold turn since he will give up with worse OTT, easily exploidable but if you read is correct its a good line.
if he is fos call down.
|
|
|
06-13-2012, 12:51 PM
|
#4
|
|
journeyman
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 238
|
Re: Lagging with TJo vs a tight reg
furo : isn't 3.5 times my bet a bit too much for a probe bet ? Doesn't he make this kind of probe by raising to 1700 in general ? Just a question because I have hard times finding when it's a probe bet and how to deal with them.
In general I raise when I think it's a probe bet not sure if that's the correct line. Like here I find it hard to raise it, without going all-in since I would have to call his jam.
|
|
|
06-13-2012, 01:13 PM
|
#5
|
|
newbie
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 34
|
Re: Lagging with TJo vs a tight reg
Quote:
Originally Posted by furo
looks like an info raise, prob call and fold turn since he will give up with worse OTT, easily exploidable but if you read is correct its a good line.
if he is fos call down.
|
I completely agree. The Yeti Theorem states that you should always 4bet/shove on boards like this as the majority of the time you're against a bluff.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cry Me A River
Yeti Theorem - A flop three bet on a dry (preferably paired) board is always a bluff.
Reasoning On a paired (or otherwise very dry flop) a player with an overpair is unlikely to want to stack off because usually the only hand he gets action from is a monster that crushes him. For this reason, someone who DOES have a monster usually will usually slowplay here. Since neither strong hands like top pair and overpairs don't 3bet here and monsters don't 3bet here the only hands left that 3bet are bluffs.
Application: If someone 3bets you in this situation, 4bet/push.
Reliability: These days this is mostly considered a joke theorem or a sarcastic excuse for spew. This is because Internet games between regulars are so much more aggressive than pre-Internet (ie live) games. For many players, "fast play is the new slow play" so players will stack off in these spots both with overpairs AND with monsters. Aggression is often used to conceal hand strength as much or more as slowplaying is used.
Against some players (ABC TAG) this theorem does still hold merit however.
|
|
|
|
06-13-2012, 04:29 PM
|
#6
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: near your blinds
Posts: 9,407
|
Re: Lagging with TJo vs a tight reg
^ 3 bet on the flop would be the raise of a reraise. . In this hand I got 2 bet
|
|
|
06-13-2012, 04:37 PM
|
#7
|
|
old hand
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,524
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by desperad0oo7
^ 3 bet on the flop would be the raise of a reraise. . In this hand I got 2 bet
|
Bet, raise, reraise, raise again is not a 3 bet. Remember, you can't raise flop when checked to.
|
|
|
06-13-2012, 05:38 PM
|
#8
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: near your blinds
Posts: 9,407
|
Re: Lagging with TJo vs a tight reg
otf first bet is 1 bet raise is 2 bet, reraise is 3 bet rereraise is 4 bet.
yetti refers to a situation where you for instance c/r a dry paired flop then get 3 bet. that's when it's almost always a bluff. trust me. I guess I misspoke (should be the reraise of a raise) but still it's clear what I meant. stop nitpicking.
|
|
|
06-13-2012, 06:30 PM
|
#9
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: yo no soy por aqui
Posts: 15,810
|
Re: Lagging with TJo vs a tight reg
What hands are you guys expecting him to raise "for information" when his raise sizing creates a turn SPR of less than 2:1 if we call? What's our equity against those hands on future streets?
OP, has he been sizing his bets/raises on the larger side? How often do you think he is FOS here?
Quote:
Originally Posted by nyaf
The ten is not even considered as an out.
|
A ten is probably the best turn card possible for us.
|
|
|
06-13-2012, 06:34 PM
|
#10
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: near your blinds
Posts: 9,407
|
Re: Lagging with TJo vs a tight reg
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBorders
What hands are you guys expecting him to raise "for information" when his raise sizing creates a turn SPR of less than 2:1 if we call? What's our equity against those hands on future streets?
OP, has he been sizing his bets/raises on the larger side? How often do you think he is FOS here?
A ten is probably the best turn card possible for us.
|
he has not been involved enough for me to notice his sizing. But considering he's been timid BVB I'm inclined to think he's not airballing very often
|
|
|
06-13-2012, 08:37 PM
|
#11
|
|
centurion
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 100
|
Re: Lagging with TJo vs a tight reg
Quote:
Originally Posted by nyaf
He is tight but didn't raise you, which doesn't mean weakness because of your horrible image. He can have pretty much everything but you would have to tend towards medium pairs+ and KJ+ because of his tightness.
He asks you 2k on a 5.2k pot which means 38%, not good considering he has a high chance of trapping you and having already two pair. The ten is not even considered as an out. So your outs are 2 J and it's not even sure since he can have QJ-KJ. Bleh bleh, sucks a bit.
If you 3 bet, you are basically saying that you've got Jx, JJ+ or a trey. If he 4bets you, you puke then have to call his jam ?
If you call you are ready to call his jam on the turn or jam yourself any card (Alone in the dark).
If you fold you are showing that you are not so serious on your flop bets and it must already be the case.
Since it's the first time he is defending his blind, since he is tight... I would fold and see if he repeats this pattern so I can punish him next time. I still got a huge M and would love to continue to hit the table with it.
|
not this. plz. not this ever.
|
|
|
06-13-2012, 09:05 PM
|
#12
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: near your blinds
Posts: 9,407
|
Re: Lagging with TJo vs a tight reg
Quote:
Originally Posted by henky
not this. plz. not this ever.
|
he actually makes some good points in that post. Apart from the "defending blinds" and "horrible image" comment. lol I work hard for that one!
|
|
|
06-13-2012, 09:24 PM
|
#13
|
|
centurion
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 100
|
Re: Lagging with TJo vs a tight reg
Quote:
Originally Posted by desperad0oo7
he actually makes some good points in that post. Apart from the "defending blinds" and "horrible image" comment. lol I work hard for that one!
|
hmm, not for nothing, but what are those points? that the T wouldn't help us at all? "the chance of him having already two pair" (lol)? or maybe the "if you fold, you'll show that you're not so serious on your flop bets"?
I rly don't mean to be a jerk and I'm not saying he's a bad player, but, come on...that was a bad post.
|
|
|
06-13-2012, 09:34 PM
|
#14
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: near your blinds
Posts: 9,407
|
Re: Lagging with TJo vs a tight reg
do you disagree that the chance of him already having 2 pair is high?
maybe he thinks the guy wouldn't 3bet a jack and isn't fos (not an unreasonable assumption) in which case a T wouldn't help.
But makes the point that with my stack it's better to avoid this high variance close spot in order to continue doing what im doing, which I think is a very good point that I lose track of very often.
But yes, the comment about the T is not his brightest.
|
|
|
06-13-2012, 09:41 PM
|
#15
|
|
centurion
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 100
|
Re: Lagging with TJo vs a tight reg
hmm, not for nothing, but we also have 2 pair..
the T would help against a huge part of his value range. sure it might not, but so what? maybe someone else folded a J and we're running dead. maybe he's spazzing out and he's almost dead. that doesn't mean anything. the T helps.
I'm not discussing that. anyway, I think you might be losing value in general.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:14 PM.
|